Multipollutant control for power plants

• Autorzy: Gostomczyk M. , Jozefowicz W.
• Konferencja: Energetyka 2004 (2004 ; Wrocław)
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper discusses technologies for multipollutant (sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, mercury) control for power plants. Activated coke, electro-catalytic oxidation, EnviroScrub, and the combination of wet desulfurization with LoTOx or selective catalytic reduction exhibit the potential for a significant control. The authors expect rapid development of several technologies not addressed here.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

mercury; nitrogen oxide; power plants; sulfur dioxide

• Wydawca: Komitet Inżynierii Chemicznej i Procesowej Polskiej Akademii Nauk
• Czasopismo: Inżynieria Chemiczna i Procesowa
• Rocznik: 2004
• Tom: T. 25, z. 4
• Strony: 2175--2181
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr 13 poz., rys., tab.,

Twórcy

autor

Gostomczyk M.

• ARCAOIS G&M, Inc., 4915F Prospectus Drive, Durham, NC 27713, USA

autor

Jozefowicz W.

• Politechnika Wrocławska, Instytut Techniki Cieplnej i Mechaniki Płynów, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław

Bibliografia

• [1] Forte R., Srivastava R.K., Tavoulareas E.S., Afonso R., Jozewicz W. Doorn M, Controlling multiple emissions from coal-fired power plants, Paper presented at A&WMA 95th Conference, Bal­timore, MD, June 2002.
• [2] McLarnon C.R., Jones, M.D., Pilot testing and scale-up of a multipollutant control technology at FirstEnergy, Paper presented at the Power-Gen International Conference, Orlando, FL, November 2000.
• [3] Boyle P.D., Operation of 50-MW ECO commercial demonstration unit at FirstEnergy's RE. Bur­ger Plant, Paper presented at Electric Power 2004, Baltimore, MD March 2004.
• [4] Watanabe T., Murayama H., Saito I., morimoto K., Shibata T., Coal-fired power stations and gas clean up processes using activated coke for the 21" century - multi-pollutant control technol­ogy, Paper presented at the 28lh International Conference on Coal Utilization & Fuel Systems, Cle­arwater, FL, March 2003.
• [5] TSUJI K., shiraishi I., Combined desulfurization, denitrification and reduction of air toxics using activated coke: 2. Process applications and performance of activated coke, Fuel 1997, 76, 555.
• [6] Interpoll Laboratories Inc., Results of the November 8, 2001 air emission monitoring on Enviro-Scrub Technologies' mobile demonstration pilot scrubber ducts at Minnesota Power's Boswell En­ergy Center in Cohasset, MN, Report submitted to Minnesota Power, December 2001.
• [7] Modern Power Systems, Can Enviroscrub clean up in the multi-pollutant control business? Novem­ber 2002.
• [8] Milobowski M.G., Wet FGD enhanced mercury control for coal-fired utility boilers. In the Pro­ceedings of the U.S. EPA-DOE-EPRI Combined Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Symposium, Chicago, IL, August 2001.
• [9] Bielawski G.T., How low can we go? [In:] the Proceedings of the U.S. EPA-DOE-EPRI Combined Power Plant Air Pollutant Control Symposium, Chicago, IL, August 2001.
• [10] Fahlke J., bursik A., Impact of the state-of-the-art of flue gas cleaning on mercury species emis­sions from coal-fired steam generators, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 1995, 80, 209.
• [11] Richardson C, Machalek T., Miller S., Dene C, Chang R., Effects of NOx control processes on mercury speciation in utility flue gas, In the Proceedings of the U.S. EPA-DOE-EPRI Combined Power Plant Air Pollutant Control^Symposium, Chicago, IL, August 2001.
• [12] Ferrell R., Controlling NOx emissions: a cooler alternative, Pollution Engineering, 2000, 4.
• [13] Jarvis J.B., Day A.T., Suchak N.J., LoTOx process flexibility and multi-pollutant control capabil­ity. In the Proceedings of the Combined Power Plant MEGA Symposium, Washington, DC, May 2003.