The local interspecific abundance - body weight relationship of ground beetles : a counterexample to the common pattern

• Autorzy: Ulrich W. , Buszko J. , Czarnecki A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The interspecific abundance - body weight relationship (AWR) is generally believed to follow a power function with a negative slope. Here we report on the AWR of two local assemblages of ground beetles in northern Poland spanning more than three orders of magnitude in body weight. Both assemblages showed significant positive AWR slopes in raw and grouped data plots even after controlling for phylogenetic and sampling effects. We conclude that ground beetles might be an exception from the overall AWR pattern.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

allometry; Carabidae; metabolic theory; poplars

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2005
• Tom: Vol. 53, nr 4
• Strony: 585--589
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Ulrich W.

• Nicholas Copernicus University in Toruń Department of Animal Ecology Gagarina 9, 87-100 Toruń: Poland

autor

Buszko J.

• Nicholas Copernicus University in Toruń Department of Animal Ecology Gagarina 9, 87-100 Toruń: Poland

autor

Czarnecki A.

• Nicholas Copernicus University in Toruń Department of Animal Ecology Gagarina 9, 87-100 Toruń: Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Blackburn T. M., Gaston K. J. 1997 – A critical assessment of the form of the interspecific relationship between abundance and body size in animals – J. Anim. Ecol. 66: 233–249.
• 2. Baars M. A. 1979 – Catches in pitfall traps in relation to mean densities of carabid beetles – Oecologia 41: 25–46.
• 3. Brown J. H., Gillooly J. H., Allen A. P., Savage V. M., West G. B. 2004 – Towards a metabolic theory of ecology – Ecology 85: 1771–1789.
• 4. Cotgreave P. 1993 – The relationship between body size and population abundance in animals - Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 244–248
• 5. Currie D. J. 1993 – What shape is the relationship between body mass and population density – Oikos 66: 353.
• 6. Cyzmann W. 2002 – Charakterystyka fitosocjologiczna plantacji topolowych w Polsce Centralnej i Północnej – UMK, Toruń (in Polish).
• 7. Damuth J. 1987 – Interspecific allometry of population density in mammals and other animals: the independence of body mass and population energy-use – Bio. J. Linn. Soc. 31: 193–246.
• 8. Ebenman B., Hedenström A., Wennergren U., Ekstam B., Landin J., Tyrberg T. 1995 – The relationship between population density and body size: the role of extinction and mobility – Oikos 73: 225–230.
• 9. Felsenstein J. 2004 – Inferring phylogenies - Sinauer, Sunderland.
• 10. Gaston K. J., Blackburn T. M. 2000 – Pattern and process in macroecology – Blackwell, London.
• 11. Gutiérrez D., Menéndez R., Méndez M. 2004 – Habitat-based conservation priorities for carabid beetles within the Picos de Europa National park, northern Spain – Biol. Cons. 115: 379–393.
• 12. Halsall N. G., Wratten S. D. 1988 – The efficiency of pitfall trapping for polyphagous predatory Carabidae – Ecol. Entomol. 13: 293–299.
• 13. Hendriks A. J. 1999 – Allometric scaling of rate, age and density parameters in ecological models – Oikos 86: 293–310.
• 14. Hurka K. 1996 – Carabidae of the Czech and the Slovak Republics – Karabourek, Zlin.
• 15. Luff M. L. 1975 – Some features influencing the efficiency of pitfall traps – Oecologia 19: 345–357.
• 16. Madison D. R., Baker M. D., Ober K. A. 1999 – Phylogeny of carabid beetles as inferred from 18S ribosomal RNA (Coleoptera: Carabidae) – Syst. Entomol. 24: 103–138.
• 17. Spence J. R., Niemelä J. K. 1994 – Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps: the madness and the method – Can. Entomol. 126: 881–894.
• 18. Statsoft Inc., 1997 – Statistica for Windows (Computer program manuals) –Tulsa, OK.
• 19. Strong D. R., Szyska L. A., Simberloff D. 1979 – Tests of community wide character displacement against null hypotheses – Evolution 33: 897–913.
• 20. Szujecki A., Szyszko J., Mazur S., Perliński S. 1983 – The process of forest soil macrofauna formation after afforestation of farmland – Warsaw Agricultural Press, Warsaw.
• 21. Ulrich W. 2001 – Hymenopteren in einem Kalkbuchenwald: Eine Modellgruppe zur Untersuchung von Tiergemeinschaften und ökologischen Raum-Zeit-Mustern - Schriftenr. Forschzentr. Waldökosysteme A 171: 1–249 (in German).
• 22. Ulrich W. 2005 – Structure – a FORTRAN program for ecological ratio analysis – www.uni.torun.pl/~ulrichw.
• 23. Ulrich W., Zalewski M. 2005 – Positive abundance – body weight relationships of ground beetles on lake islands – Verhandl. Ges. Ökol. 35: 485.
• 24. Ulrich W., Buszko J., Czarnecki A. 2004 - The contribution of Poplar plantations to regional diversity of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in agricultural landscapes - Ann. Zool. Fennici 41: 501–512.
• 25. Ulyshen M. D., Hanula J. L., Horn S. 2005 – Using malaise traps to sample ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) – Can. Entomol. 137: 251–256.
• 26. Work T. T., Buddle C. M., Korinus L. M., Spence J. R. 2002 – Pitfall trap size and capture of three taxa of litter-dwelling arthropods: implications for biodiversity studies – Environm. Entomol. 31: 438–448.