Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
To test the hypothesis of random oviposition by Maculinea butterflies we investigated the oviposition patterns of M. alcon Denis & Schiffermüller in wet meadows in the Vistula valley, southern Poland, in relation to the stem length and flower number of Gentiana pneumonanthe Linnaeus foodplants as well as to their spatial distribution, the height of the surrounding vegetation and the presence of potential ant hosts. Analysis conducted for 403 gentians recorded within the 0.96 ha study plot indicated that plants with M. alcon eggs present were significantly higher and had more flowers. On the other hand, neither the local density of gentians nor the presence of ant hosts had any apparent effect on oviposition preferences of M. alcon. Our conclusion is that females of the butterfly select visually conspicuous plants as the oviposition sites regardless of their clumping or ant presence. As a consequence, the two factors do not need to be included in computer models developed to study the population dynamics of the species and its trophic interactions with foodplants and ant hosts.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
409--417
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 41 poz., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
- Institute of Environmental Sciences Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Cracow, Poland
autor
- Institute of Environmental Sciences Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Cracow, Poland
autor
- Institute of Environmental Sciences Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Cracow, Poland
autor
- Institute of Environmental Sciences Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Cracow, Poland
Bibliografia
- 1. Chew F. S., Robbins R. K. 1984 – Egg-laying in butterflies (In: The Biology of Butterflies, Eds. R. Vane-Wright, P. R. Ackery) – Academic Press, New York, pp. 65–79.
- 2. Clarke R. T., Thomas J. A., Elmes G. W., Hochberg. M. 1997 – The effects of spatial patterns in habitat quality on community dynamics within a site – Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 347–354.
- 3. Clarke R. T., Thomas J. A., Elmes G. W., Wardlaw J. C., Munguira M. L., Hochberg. M. E. 1998 – Population modelling of the spatial interactions between Maculinea, their initial foodplant and Myrmica ants within a site – J. Insect Conserv. 2: 29–37.
- 4. Courtney S. P. 1981 – Coevolution of pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants. III. Anthocharis cardamines (L.). Survival, development, and oviposition on different hostplants - Oecologia, 51: 91–96.
- 5. Courtney S. P. 1982 – Coevolution of pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants. IV. Crucifer apparency and Anthocharis cardamines (L.) oviposition – Oecologia, 52: 258–265.
- 6. Cromartie W. J. 1975 – The effect of stand size and vegetational background on the colonization of cruciferous plants by herbivorous insects – J. Appl. Ecol. 12: 517–533.
- 7. Elmes G. W., Clarke R. T., Thomas J. A., Hochberg M. E. 1996 – Empirical tests of specific predictions made from a spatial model of the population dynamics of Maculinea rebeli, a parasitic butterfly of red ant colonies - Acta Oecol. 17: 61–80.
- 8. Elmes G.W., Thomas J.A. 1987 – Die Gattung Maculinea (In: Tagfalter und ihr Lebensraum, Ed. W. Geiger) – Basel: Schweizerishes Bund für Naturschutz pp. 354–368.
- 9. Elmes G. W., Thomas J. A. 1992 – The complexity of species conservation: interactions between Maculinea butterflies and their ant hosts – Biodivers. Conserv. 1: 155–169.
- 10. Elmes G. W., Thomas J. A., Hammarstedt O., Munguira M. L., Martin J., Van der Made J. G. 1994 – Differences in host-ant specificity between Spanish, Dutch and Swedish populations of the endangered butterfly Maculinea alcon (Denis et. Schiff.) (Lepidoptera) – Mem. Zool. 48: 55–68.
- 11. Elmes G. W., Wardlaw J. C., Thomas J. A. 1991a – Larvae of Maculinea rebeli, a large blue butterfly, and their Myrmica host ants: wild adoption and behaviour in antnests - J. Zool. Lond. 223: 447–460.
- 12. Elmes G. W., Wardlaw J. C., Thomas J. A. 1991b – Larvae of Maculinea rebeli, a large blue butterfly, and their Myrmica host ants: patterns of caterpillar growth and survival – J. Zool. Lond. 224: 79–92.
- 13. Figurny E., Woyciechowski M. 1998 - Flowerhead selection for oviposition by females of the sympatric butterfly species Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae) – Entomol. Gen. 23: 215–222.
- 14. Figurny-Puchalska E. 1998 – Myrmekofilne motyle Maculinea teleius i Maculinea nausithous, ich gospodarze i roślina żywicielska [Myrmecophilus butterflies Maculinea nausithous and Maculinea teleius - their host ants and host plant] – Doctoral Thesis. Cracow Agricultural University.
- 15. Forsberg J. 1987 – Size discrimination among conspecific plants in two pierid butterflies: Pieris napi L. and Pontia daplidice L. – Oecologia, 72: 52–57.
- 16. Gadeberg R. M. E., Boomsma J. J. 1997 - Genetic population structure of the large blue butterfly Maculinea alcon in Denmark - J. Insect Conserv. 1: 99–111.
- 17. Hochberg M. E., Thomas J. A., Elmes G. W. 1992 – A modelling study of the population dynamics of a large blue butterfly, Maculinea rebeli, a parasite of red ant nests – J. Anim. Ecol. 61: 397–409.
- 18. Hochberg M. E., Clarke R. T., Elmes G. W., Thomas J. A. 1994 – Population dynamic consequences of direct and indirect interactions involving a large blue butterfly and its plant and red ant hosts – J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 375–391.
- 19. Kaaber S. 1964 – Studies on Maculinea alcon (Schiff.)-rebeli (Hir.) (Lep. Lycaenidae) with reference to the taxonomy, distribution, and phylogeny of the group – Entomol. Medd. 32: 277–319.
- 20. Kery M., Matthies D., Fisher M. 2001 - The effect of plant population size on the interactions between the rare plant Gentiana cruciata and its specialized herbivore Maculinea rebeli – J. Ecol. 89: 418–427.
- 21. Munguira M. L., Martin J. (compilers) 1999 – Action Plan for Maculinea Butterflies in Europe. Nature and Environment 97 – Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, 66 pp.
- 22. Murphy D. D. 1983 – Nectar sources as constraints on the distribution of egg masses by the checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas chalcedona (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) – Environ. Entomol. 12: 463–466.
- 23. Myers J. H., Monro J., Murray N. 1981 - Egg clumping, host plant selection and population regulation in Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera) – Oecologia, 51: 7–13.
- 24. Pępkowska A. 2002 – Inwentaryzacja i waloryzacja krajobrazowo – przyrodnicza terenów przyległych do Kampusu 600-lecia Odnowienia Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego [Valorisation of natural and landscape values of the areas adjacent to the Campus of the 600-Year Anniversary of the Jagiellonian University Renewal] – MSc. Thesis, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, 87 pp.
- 25. Scheper M., Van der Made J. G., Wynhoff I. 1995 – Maculinea alcon: interactions between a myrmecophilous butterfly, its larval foodplant and its host ant – Proc. Exper. & Appl. Entomol. NEV Amsterdam, 6: 77–78.
- 26. Sielezniew M., Stankiewcz A. 2001 – First data on host-ant specificity of parasitic Maculinea alcon (Den. and Schiff.) (Lepidoptera: Lyceanidae) in Poland and eastern Europe - Fragm. Faun. 45: 123–130.
- 27. Singer M. C. 1984 – Butterfly-hostplant relationships: host quality, adult choice and larval success (In: The Biology of Butterflies, Eds. R. Vane-Wright, P. R. Ackery) – Academic Press, New York, pp. 82–88.
- 28. Thomas J. A. 1977 – Ecology and conservation of the Large Blue butterfly – 2nd Report – Abbots Ripton: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.
- 29. Thomas J. A. 1984 – The behaviour and habitat requirements of Maculinea nausithous (the Dusky Large Blue) and M. teleius (the Scarce Large Blue) in France – Biol. Conserv. 28: 325–347.
- 30. Thomas J. A., Clarke R. T., Elmes G. W., Hochberg M. E. 1998 – Population dynamics in the genus Maculinea (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) (In: Insect population dynamics in theory and practice. Symposia of the Royal Entomological Society 19, Eds. J. P. Dempster, I. F.G. McLean) – Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 261–290.
- 31. Thomas J. A., Elmes G. W. 2001 – Foodplant niche selection rather than presence of ant nests explains oviposition patterns in the myrmecophilus butterfly genus Maculinea - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268: 471–477.
- 32. Thomas J. A., Elmes G. W., Wardlaw J. C., Woyciechowski M. 1989 – Host specificity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests – Oecologia, 79: 452–457.
- 33. Thomas J. A., Munguira M. L., Mar tin J., Elmes G. W. 1991 – Basal hatching by Maculinea butterflies eggs: a consequence of advanced myrmecophily? – Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 44: 175–184.
- 34. Thomas J. A., Wardlaw J. C. 1992 – The capacity of a Myrmica ant nest to support a predacious species of Maculinea butterfly - Oecologia, 85: 87–91.
- 35. Thompson J. N. 1978 – Within-patch structure and dynamics in Pastinaca sativa and resource availability to a specialized herbivore - Ecology, 59: 443–448.
- 36. Thompson J. N., Pellmyr O. 1991 – Evolution of oviposition behavior and host preference in Lepidoptera – Annu. Rev. Entomol. 36: 65–89.
- 37. Thompson J. N., Price P. W. 1977 – Plant plasticity, phenology, and herbivore dispersion: wild parsnip and the parsnip webworm - Ecology, 58: 1112–1119.
- 38. Van Dyck H., Talloen W., Oostermeijer J. G. B., Feenstra V., Van der Hidde A., Wynhoff I. 2000 – Does the presence of ant nests matter for oviposition to a specialized myrmecophilous Maculinea butterfly? - Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267: 861–866.
- 39. Van Swaay C., Warren M. 1999 – Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment 99 – Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg, 66 pp.
- 40. Wells S. M., Pyle R. M., Collins N. M. 1983 – The IUCN Red Data Book: Invertebrates - IUCN, Gland, 632 pp.
- 41. Wynhoff I. 2001 – At Home on Foreign Meadows: the Reintroduction of two Maculinea Butterfly species – Doctoral Thesis. Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BGPK-1042-4199