Soil-litter macrofauna in the mixed forest and midfield shelterbelts of different age (Turew area, West Poland)

• Autorzy: Olechowicz E.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper deals with the composition, density and biomass of soil-litter macrofauna in four midfield shelterbelts of different age and, comparatively, in the neighbouring mixed forest. The increase was observed along with the shelterbelt ageing of: 1) numbers of all macrofauna and particularly of some taxa (Symphyla, Chilopoda, coleopteran larvae and imagines and some dipteran larvae), 2) biomass of all macrofauna, of soil fauna (Group I) and of coleopteran larvae, 3) share of zoophages in all macrofauna and in dipteran larvae, 4) share of phytophages in coleopteran larvae communities, 5) average individual biomass, 6) taxonomic richness and the biodiversity (H'), 7) similarity of composition and domination structure of all macrofauna and of dipteran larvae to those in forest communities. The decrease of density of dipteran larvae, particularly of Chironomidae and Sciaridae and the share of saprophages in all macrofauna and in dipteran larvae was also observed. Successional stages of more numerous invertebrate taxa in newly established woodlots are described. Dipteran larvae were the pioneers in colonising newly established shelterbelts, particularly larvae from two families: Chironomidae and Sciaridae. Their combined contribution to the total density of dipteran larvae was 92%.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

biomass; density; domination structure; individual biomass; mixed forest; shelterbelts; soil-litter macrofauna; succession; trophic structure

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2004
• Tom: Vol. 52, nr 4
• Strony: 405--419
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Olechowicz E.

• Centre for Ecological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Dziekanów Leśny, 05-092 Łomianki, Poland,

Bibliografia

• [1] Bernacki Z. 2004 – Secondary succession of the vegetation in the young shelterbelt (Turew area, Western Poland) – Pol. J. Ecol. 52: 391-404.
• [2] Borowski J. 1995 – Antropogeniczne przeobrażenia zgrupowań larw muchówek (Diptera) borów sosnowych Polski. [Antropogenic transformations in communities of Diptera larvae of pine forests] (In: Antropogeniczne przeobrażenia epigeicznej i glebowej entomofauny borów sosnowych. [Anthropogenic transformations of epigeic and soil fauna of pine forests]. – Warszawa, Fundacja ”Rozwój SGGW”, 335-355. (in Polish).
• [3] Boudry J. 1988 – Hedgerows and hedgerow networks as wildlife habitat in agricultural landscapes. (In: Environmental Management in Agriculture. European Perspectives. Ed. J. R. Park) – Belhaven Press, London: 111-124.
• [4] Dąbrowska-Prot E. 1999 – Influence of agricultural landscape on biodiversity of entomofauna communities. (In: Insect population growth and the environment. Ed. C. A. Barlow). – Publ. Research Sigupost, Trivandrum, India.: 57-67.
• [5] Frouz J. 1994 – Changes in terrestrial chironomid community (Diptera: Chironomidae) during secondary succession in old fields. – Pedobiologia 32: 334-343.
• [6] Frouz J. 2001 – Use of soil dwelling Diptera (Insecta, Diptera) as bioindicators: a review of ecological requirements and response to disturbance. (In: Invertebrate biodiversity as bioindicators of sustainable landscapes. Practical use invertebrates to assess sustainable land use. Ed. M. G. Paoletti). – Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 74: 167-186.
• [7] Hutson R. R. 1980 – The influence on soil development of the invertebrate fauna colonizing industrial reclaimed sites. – J. Appl. Ecol. 17: 277-286.
• [8] Karg J. 1995 – Nowe zadrzewienia w krajobrazie rolniczym jako czynnik intensyfikujący procesy regulacji biocenotycznej. [New shelterbelts in agricultural landscape – factor enhancing processes of biocenotic density control] – Biuletyn Parków Krajobrazowych 2: 17-27. (in Polish).
• [9] Karg J. 1998 – Wpływ nowowprowadzonych zadrzewień sródpolnych na wzbogacanie zespołów owadów krajobrazu rolniczego. [Influence of newly planted midfield shelterbelts on agricultural landscape insects communities enrichment] (In: Dobre praktyki w produkcji rolniczej. [Good practices in agriculture], Mat. of scientific conference]) – IUNG Puławy, 211-217. (in Polish).
• [10] Karg J. 2004 – Importance of midfield shelterbelts for over-wintering entomofauna (Turew area, West Poland) – Pol. J. Ecol., 52: 421-431.
• [11] Karg J., Ryszkowski L. 1996 – Wpływ struktury krajobrazu rolniczego na bioróżnorodność i procesy regulacji biocenotycznej. [Influence of agricultural landscape structure on biodiversity and biocenotic regulation processes] (In: Ekologiczne procesy na obszarach intensywnego rolnictwa. [Ecological processes on the intensive agriculture areas] Eds: L. Ryszkowski, S. Bałazy). – ZBSRiL PAN. Poznań: 21-31. (in Polish).
• [12] Kempson O., Lloyd M., Gheraldi R. 1963 – A new extractor for woodland litter. – Pedobiologia 3: 1-21.
• [13] Kostro-Chomać A. 2003 – Substancja organiczna gleby i jej właściwości w agroekosystemie z zadrzewieniem śródpolnym [Soil organic matter content and properties in agroecosystem with midfield shelterbelts] – Ph. Doctor`s Thesis, Warsaw Agricultural University, Warsaw (in Polish).
• [14] Kujawa A., Karg J. 1998 – Wstępne wyniki inwentaryzacji zadrzewień na terenie Parku Krajobrazowego im. Gen. D. Chłapowskiego. [Preliminary results of woodlot inventory in the gen. D. Chłapowski Landscape Park] – Biuletyn Parków Krajobrazowych Wielkopolski, 3 (5): 59-66. (in Polish).
• [15] Marczewski M., Steinhaus H. 1959 – O odległości systematycznej biotopów [On the taxonomic distance of biotopes]. – Zastos. Matem. 4: 195-203. (in Polish).
• [16] Olechowicz E. 1986 – Density and biomass of soil macrofauna from different forest ecosystems of the Kampinos Forest. – Ekol. pol. 34, 4: 689-710.
• [17] Olechowicz E. 1995 – Structure and function of invertebrate communities in three different forest ecosystems: pine forest, pine-oak forest and alder swamp. (In: Functioning and dynamic of natural and perturbed ecosystems. Eds: D. Bellan, G. Bonin, Ch. Emig.) – Londres, Paris, New York, 423-438.
• [18] Olechowicz E. 1998 – Makrofauna glebowo-ściółkowa borów sosnowych w gradiencie zróżnicowań klimatycznych oraz zanieczyszczeń przemysłowych w Polsce, [The soil and litter macrofauna of pine forest along gradients of climate and industrial pollution in Poland], (In: Bory sosnowe w gradiencie kontynentalizmu i zanieczyszczeń w Europie Środkowej. [Pine forests along the climate and pollution gradient in Central Europe] Eds: A. Breymeyer, E. Roo-Zielińska). – Dokumentacja Geograficzna 13: 145-160. (in Polish).
• [19] Olechowicz E. 2004 – Community structure of soil-litter macrofauna in shelterbelt and adjacent crop field. – Pol. J. Ecol. 52, 2: 135-153.
• [20] Paplińska E. 1980 – Preliminary analysis of communities of soil Diptera larvae in forest ecosystems from variously utilized areas. – Pol. ecol. Stud. 6, 4: 625-643.
• [21] Paplińska E. 1984 – Density, biomass and qualitative structure of soil Diptera larvae communities in industrial areas. – Pol. ecol. Stud. 10, 1-2: 93-110.
• [22] Paoletti M. G. 2001 – Invertebrate biodiversity as bioindicators of sustainable landscapes. – Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 74, 450 pp.
• [23] Paquin P., Coderre D. 1997 – Changes in soil macroarthropod communities in relation to forest maturation through three successional stages in the Canadian boreal forest. – Oecologia 112: 104-111.
• [24] Reichle D. E. 1971 – Energy and nutrient metabolism of soil and litter invertebrates. (In: Productivity of forest ecosystems. Ed. P. Duvigneaud). – UNESCO, Paris, 465-477.
• [25] Romaniszyn W. 1970 – Próba interpretacji tendencji skupiskowych zwierząt w oparciu o definicje podobieństwa i odległości [An attempt at interpreting agglomerative tendencies of animals based on definition of similarity and distance]. – Wiad. ekol. 14: 306-327. (in Polish).
• [26] Ryszkowski L., Karg J., Kujawa K. 1999 – Ochrona i kształtowanie różnorodności biologicznej w krajobrazie rolniczym. [Protection and formation of biological diversity in agricultural landscape] (In: Uwarunkowania ochrony różnorodności biologicznej i krajobrazowej. [Determinants of the protection of biological and landscape diversity] Eds: L. Ryszkowski, S. Bałazy). – ZBSRiL, Poznań: 59-79. (in Polish).
• [27] Ryszkowski L., Karg J., Kujawa K., Gołdyn H., Arczyńska-Chudy E. 2001 – Influence of landscape mosaic structure on diversity of wild plant and animal communities in agricultural landscape of Poland. (In: Landscape ecology in agroecosystems management. Ed. L. Ryszkowski). – CRS Press, Boca Raton, New York, Washington D. C.: 185-217.
• [28] Schaefer M., Schauermann J. 1990 – The soil fauna of beech forests: comparison between a mull and a moder soil. – Pedobiologia 34: 299-314.
• [29] Sobczyk D. 2004 – Butterflies (Lepidoptera) of young midfield shelterbelts – Pol. J. Ecol 52: 449-453.
• [30] Stork N. E., Eggleton P. 1992 – Invertebrates as determinants and indicators of soil quality. – Am. J. Altern. Agric. 7: 38-47.
• [31] Struve-Kusenberg R. 1981 – Sukzesion und tropishe Structur der Bodenfauna von Brachflachen. – Pedobiologia 21: 132-141.
• [32] Szujecki A. 1990 – Ekologiczne aspekty odtwarzania ekosystemów leśnych na gruntach porolnych. [Ecological aspects of redevelopment of forest ecosystems on old farm land] – Sylwan 3-12: 23-40. (in Polish).
• [33] Szujecki A., Mazur S., Szyszko J., Perliński S. 1977 – Changes in the structure of macrofauna communities on afforested arable land. – Ecol. Bull. 25: 580-584.
• [34] Thomas C. F. G., Cooke H., Bauly J., Marshall E. J. P. 1994 – Invertebrate colonization of overwintering sites in different field boundary habitats. (In: Arable Farming under CAP Reform – Aspects of Applied Biology No.40, Eds: J. Clarke, A. Mitchell, M. Ramans and P. Ryan). – Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne, U. K.: 229-232.
• [35] Van der Drift J. 1951 – Analysis of the animal community in a beech forest floor. – Tijdschr. Ent. 94: 1-168.
• [36] Van der Drift J. 1967 – Dynamics of soil communities. (In: Progression Soil Biology. Eds: O. Graff, J. E. Satchell, T. Vieweg and Sohn GmbH Braunschweig) – North-Holland Publ. Company, Amsterdam, 613-629.
• [37] Vanek J. 1959 – Poużitelnost pudni zoologie pro lesnickou typologii. – Sbornik Ved. Pr. Fak. Les. v Praze, 2: 25-40.
• [38] Wallwork J. A. 1970 – Ecology of soil animals. – Mc Graw-Hill, London, New York, Sydney, Toronto, Johannesburg, Panama.
• [39] Wojewoda D., Russel S. 2003 – The impast of a shelterbelt on soil properties and microbial activity in an adjacent crop field. – Pol. J. Ecol. 51: 291-307.
• [40] Wratten S. D. 1998 – The role of field boundaries as reservoirs of beneficial insects. (In: Environmental Management in Agriculture: European Perspectives Ed. J. R. Park) – 144-150.