PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Articulated palaeoscolecid sclerite arrays from the Lower Cambrian of eastern Siberia

Autorzy
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Phosphatized palaeoscolecid cuticle fragments of Palaeoscolex lubovae sp. nov., P. spinosus sp. nov., Palaeoscolex sp. and Sahascolex labyrinthus gen. et sp. nov., as well as disarticulated sclerites, are described from the Early Cambrian Sinsk Formation (Siberian Platform) at the Achchagyy Tuoydakh fossil-Lagerstatte. These remarkably well preserved arrays of plates and platelets display ornamentation identical to widely reported isolated sclerites assigned to Hadimopanella, Kaimenella, Milaculum, and Utahphospha. The precise relationship of the Palaeoscolecida to the priapulids or alternatively with the nematomorphs remains under discussion, but suggested is their systematic position within the superphylum Ecdysozoa, comprising moulting animals. some of the described cuticular trunks exhibit distinction between the dorsal and ventral sides: nodular sclerites occur on the dorsal and spiny sclerites on the ventral sides of the worm body. Such a pattern of ornamentation may suggest adaptation for a level-bottom, vagile benthic and probably epifaunal mode of life. The Siberian palaeoscolecids are compared with the type species of Palaeoscolex, P. piscatorum Whittard, 1953, and with palaeoscolecid worms from Australia, Bohemia and China. Sclerites recorded with microplates accreted into the basal brim may support a hypothesis that the more complex sclerite structure bearing a series of nodes was derived from simple small sclerites with single node. The biostratigraphic utility of isolated sclerites remains low, because of the same morphology occur in different sclerites may occur in one scleritome.
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Strony
1--22
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 73 poz., rys.
Twórcy
autor
  • Paleontological Institute Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Profsoyuznaya 123, Moscow, 117647 Russia
autor
  • Instytut Paleobiologii, Polska Akademia Nauk, ul. Twarda 51/55, Pl-00-818 Warszawa, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. AGUINALDO, A.M. & LAKE, J.A. 1998. Evolution of the multicellular animals. American Zoologist, 38, 878-887.
  • 2. AGUINALDO, A.M., TURBEVILLE, J.M., LINFORD, L.S., RIVERA, M.C., GAREY, J.R. RAFF, R.A. & LAKE, J.A. 1997. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature, 387, 489-493.
  • 3. ASTASHKIN, V.A., VARLAMOV, A.I., ESAKOVA, N.V., ZHURAVLEV, A.YU., REPINA, L.N., ROZANOV, A.YU., FEDOROV, A.B. & SHABANOV, Yu.Ya. 1990. Guide on Aldan and Lena Rivers. Siberian Platform. Third International Symposium on Cambrian System; Novosibirsk. Academy of Sciences of the USSSR, Siberian Branch, Institute of Geology and Geophysics. 115 pp. Novosibirsk. [In Russian]
  • 4. BARSKOV, I.S. & ZHURAVLEV, A. Yu. 1988. Soft-bodied organisms from the Cambrian of the Siberian Platform. Paleontologicheskij Zhurnal, 1, 3-9. [In Russian]
  • 5. BAKHTUROV, S. F., EVTUSHENKO, V. M., & PERELADOV, V. S. 1988. Kuonamka bituminous carbonate-shale formation. AN SSSR, Sibirskoye Otdeleniye, Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki, 671, 1-152. [In Russian]
  • 6. BATHER, F.A. 1920. Protoscolex latus, a new “worm” from Ludlow Beds. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, (9), 5, 124-132.
  • 7. BENDIX-ALMGREEN, S. E. & PEEL, J. S. 1988. Hadimopanella from the Lower Cambrian of North Greenland: structure and affinities. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark, 37, 83-103.
  • 8. BENGTSON, S. 1977. Early Cambrian button-shaped phosphatic microfossils from the Siberian Platform. Palaeontology, 20, 751-762.
  • 9. - 1985. Taxonomy of disarticulated fossils. Journal of Paleontology, 59, 1350-1358.
  • 10. BOOGAARD, M. VAN DEN 1983. The occurrence of Hadimopanella oezgueli Gedik in the Lancara Formation in NW Spain. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series B, 86, 331-341.
  • 11. - 1988. Some data on Milaculum Müller, 1973. Scripta Geologica, 88, 1-25.
  • 12. - 1989a. A problematic microfossil, Hadimopanella? Coronata sp. nov., from the Ordovician of Estonia. Rijksmuseum van Geologie en Mineralogie, Series B, 92, 179-190.
  • 13. - 1989b. Isolated tubercles of some Palaeoscolecida. Scripta Geologica, 90, 1-12.
  • 14. BURZIN, M.B., DEBRENNE, F. & ZHURAVLEV, A.YU. 2001. Evolution of shallow-water level-bottom communities. In: A.YU. ZHURAVLEV and R. RIDING (Eds), The Ecology of the Cambrian Radiation, 217-237. Columbia University Press; New York.
  • 15. CHERCHI, A. & SCHROEDER, R. 1984. Middle Cambrian Foraminifera and other microfossils from SW Sardinia. Bolletino della Societ∫ Paleontologica Italiana, 23, 149-160.
  • 16. CONWAY MORRIS, S. 1993. The fossil record and the early evolution of the Metazoa. Nature, 361, 219-225.
  • 17. - 1997. The cuticular structure of the 495-Myr-old type species of the fossil worm Palaeoscolex, P. piscatorum (?priapulida). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 119, 69-82.
  • 18. CONWAY MORRIS, S. & ROBISON, R. A. 1986. Middle Cambrian priapulids and other soft-bodied fossils from Utah and Spain. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 117, 1-22.
  • 19. - & - 1988. More soft-bodied animals and algae from the Middle Cambrian of Utah and British Columbia. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 122, 1-48.
  • 20. DZIK, J. 1986. Chordate affinities of the conodonts. In: A. HOFFMAN & M. H. NITECKI (Eds), Problematic fossil taxa. Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, 5, 240-254. Oxford University Press, New York, Calderon Press; Oxford.
  • 21. - 1994. Evolution of “small shelly fossils” assemblages of the Early Paleozoic. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 39, 241-313.
  • 22. ETHINGTON, R.L. & CLARK, D.L. 1981. Lower and Middle Ordovician Conodonts from the Ibex Area western Millard County, Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 28, 1-155.
  • 23. FERNÁNDEZ-REMOLAR, D.C. 2001. Nota sobre la destribución estratigráfica de Hadimopanella GEDIK, 1977 (microescleritos de paleoscolécidos), en el Cámbrico [On the Cambrian stratigraphical distribution of Hadimopanella GEDIK, 1977 (microsclerites of palaeoscolecids)]. Revista Española de Micropaleontología, 33, 113-121.
  • 24. GÁMEZ VINTANED, J.A. 1995. Neuvo hallazgo de un anélido (?) paleoscolécido en el Cámbrico medio de Murero (Cadena Ibérica occidental, NE de España). In: J.A. GÁMEZ VINTANED & E. LIπÁN (Eds), La expansión de la vida en el Cámbrico. Memorias de las IV Jornadas Aragonesas de Paleontología. Institución “Fernando el Católico”, 205-218. Zaragoza.
  • 25. GARCIA-BELLIDO CAPDEVILA, D. & CONWAY MORRIS, S. 1999. New fossil worms from the Lower Cambrian of the Kinzers Formation, Pennsylvania, with some comments on Burgess Shale-type preservation. Journal of Paleontology, 73, 394-402.
  • 26. GAREY, J.R. & SCHMIDT-RHAESA, A. 1998. The essential role of ‘minor’ phyla in molecular studies of animal evolution. American Zoologist, 38, 907-917.
  • 27. GEDIK, I. 1977. Conodont stratigraphy in the Middle Taurus. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Turkey, 20, 35-48. [In Turkish with English abstract]
  • 28. - 1989. Hadimopanellid biostratigraphy in the Cambrian of the Western Taurids: A new biostratigraphic tool in the subdivision of Cambrian System. Geological Bulletin of Turkey, 32, 65-77. [In Turkish with English abstract]
  • 29. GLAESSNER, M.F. 1979. Lower Cambrian Crustacea and annelid worms from Kangaroo Island, South Australia. Alcheringa, 3, 21-31.
  • 30. HINZ, I. 1987. The Lower Cambrian microfauna of Comley and Rushton, Shropshire/England. Palaeontographica A, 198, 41-100.
  • 31. HINZ, I., KRAFT, P., MERGL, M. & MÜLLER, K. J. 1990. The problematic Hadimopanella, Kaimenella, Milaculum and Utahphospha identified as sclerites of Palaeoscolecida. Lethaia, 23, 217-221.
  • 32. HOU XIANGUANG & BERGSTRÖM, J. 1994. Palaeoscolecid worms my be nematomorphs rather than annelids. Lethaia, 27, 11-17.
  • 33. - & - 2003. The Chengjiang fauna - the oldest preserved animal community. Paleontological Research, 7, 55-70.
  • 34. HOU XIANGUANG & CHEN JUNYUAN. 1989. Early arthropodannelid intermediate sea animal, Loulishania gen. nov. from Chengjiang, Yunnan. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 28, 1-15. [In Chinese with English summary]
  • 35. HOU XIANGUANG & SUN WEIGUO. 1988. Discovery of Chengjiang fauna at Meishucun, Jinning, Yunnan. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 27, 1-12. [In Chinese with English summary]
  • 36. IVANTSOV, A.Yu. 1996. First in Russia large locality with extraordinarily well preserved Cambrian invertebrates. Vserossijskij simpozium “Zagadochnye organizmy v evolucij i filogenij”. Paleontologicheskij institut Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk; Moskva, p. 42. [In Russian]
  • 37. - 1999. Trilobite-like arthropod from the Lower Cambrian of the Siberian Platform. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 44, 455-466.
  • 38. IVANTSOV, A.YU., ZHURAVLEV, A.YU., LEONOV, M.V. & LEGUTA, A.V. 1997. New Lower Cambrian occurrence of Burgess Shale-type fossils in Siberia. CSPG - SEPM Joint Convention, Abstracts, p. 143. Moskva.
  • 39. KHOMENTOVSKY, V.V. & REPINA, L.N. 1965. Lower Cambrian of the Stratotype Section of Siberia. 214 pp. Nauka; Moskva. [In Russian]
  • 40. KONEVA, S.P., POPOV, L. E., USHATINSKAYA, G.T. & ESAKOVA, N.V. 1990. Lingulate brachiopods (acrotretids) and microproblemtics from the Upper Cambrian of north-eastern Kazakhstan. In: L.N. REPINA (Ed.), Biostratigraphy and palaeontology of the Cambrian of North Asia. [Biostratigrafija i paleontologija kembrija Severnoj Azii]. AN SSSR, Sibirskoye Otdeleniye, Trudy Instituta Geologii i Geofiziki, 765, 158-170. Novosibirsk. [In Russian]
  • 41. KRAFT, P. & MERGL, M. 1989. Worm-like fossils (Palaeoscolecida; ?Chaetognata) from the Lower Ordovician of Bohemia. Sbornik Geologickych Ved Paleontologie, 30, 9-36.
  • 42. LIN TIANRUI. 1995. Discovery of late Early Cambrian worm from Huainan, Anhui. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 34, 504-508. [In Chinese with English summary]
  • 43. MELNIKOVA, L. M. 1998. Revision of some Cambrian Bradoriids (Crustacea) from Siberian Platform. Paleontologicheskij Zhurnal, 4, 36-40. [In Russian]
  • 44. - 2000. A new genus of Bradoriidae (Crustacea) from the Cambrian of Northern Eurasia. Paleontologicheskij Zhurnal, 2, 65-68. [In Russian]
  • 45. MÄRSS, T. 1988. Early Palaeozoic hadimopanellids of Estonia and Kirgizia (USSR). Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR, Geology, 37, 10-17.
  • 46. MÜLLER, K. J. 1973a. Late Cambrian and Early Ordovician conodonts from Northern Iran. Geological Survey of Iran, Report, 30, 1-53.
  • 47. - 1973b. Milaculum n. g. ein phosphatisches Mikrofossil aus dem Altpaläozoikum. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, 47, 217-228.
  • 48. MÜLLER, K. J. & HINZ-SCHALLREUTER, I. 1993. Palaeoscolecid worms from the Middle Cambrian of Australia. Palaeontology, 36, 3, 543-592.
  • 49. MÜLLER, K.J. & MILLER, J.F. 1976. The problematic microfossil Utahphospha from the Upper Cambrian of the western United States. Lethaia, 9, 391-395.
  • 50. PEEL, J.S. & LARSEN, N.H. 1984. Hadimopanella apicata from the Lower Cambrian of western North Greenland. Rapport Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse, 121, 89-96.
  • 51. PEGEL, T. V. 2000. Evolution of trilobite biofacies in Cambrian basins of the Siberian Platform. Journal of Paleontology, 74, 1000-1019.
  • 52. REESER, C. E. & HOWELL, B.F. 1938. Lower Cambrian Olenellus Zone of the Appalachians. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 49, 195-248.
  • 53. REPETSKI, J. E. 1981. An Ordovician occurrence of Utahphospha Müller and Miller. Journal of Paleontology, 55, 395-400.
  • 54. REPINA, L.N. 1983. On the Lower Cambrian stage subdivision of Siberia (on Trilobites). In: N.P. MESHKOVA (Ed.), Biostratigraphy and Paleontology of the Lower and Middle Cambrian of northern Asia, Trudy Instituta geologii i geofizyki SO AN SSSR, 541, 45-65. Novosibirsk. [In Russian]
  • 55. ROBISON, R.A. 1969. Annelids from the Middle Cambrian Spence Shale of Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 43, 1169-1173.
  • 56. - 1991. Middle Cambrian biotic diversity: examples from four Utah Lagerstätten. 77-93. In: A. SIMONETTA & S. CONWAY MORRIS (Eds), The Early Evolution of Metazoa and the Significance of Problematic Taxa. Proceedings of an International Symposium Held at the University of Camerino 27-31 March 1989. Universitá degli Studi di Camerino, Dipartimento di Biologia Molecolare, Cellulare e Animale. Camerino.
  • 57. ROZANOV, A.YU. & SOKOLOV, B.S. (Eds) 1984. Lower Cambrian stage subdivision Stratigraphy. Akademia Nauk SSSR. 184 pp. Nauka; Moskva. [In Russian]
  • 58. ROZANOV, A.YU. & ZHURAVLEV, A.Yu. 1992. The Lower Cambrian fossil record of the Soviet Union. In: J.H. LIPPS & P.W. SIGNOR (Eds), Origin and Early Evolution of the Metazoa, 205-282. Plenum Press; New York- London.
  • 59. SARMIENTO, G.N., FERNÁNDEZ-REMOLAR, D. & GÖNCÜOGLU, M.C. 2001. Cambrian small shelly fossils from the Cal Tepe Formation, Taurus Mountains, Turkey. Coloquios de Paleontología, 52, 117-134.
  • 60. SAVITSKY, V.E. & ASTASHKIN, V.A. 1979. The significance and devolpment of reef building in the Cambrian history of the Siberian Platform. In: V.E. SAVITSKY (Ed.), Geology of Reef Systems of the Cambrian of Western Yakutia. 5-18. Siberian Scientific Research Institute of Geology, Geophysics and Mineral Resources, Novosibirsk. [In Russian]
  • 61. SEILACHER, A., REIF, W.-E. & WESTPHAL, F. 1985. Sedimentological, ecological and temporal patterns of fossil Lagerstätten. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 311, 5-24.
  • 62. ULRICH, E.O. 1878. Observations on fossil annelids and descriptions of some new forms. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 1, 87-91.
  • 63. USHATINSKAYA, G. T. 2001. O stroenii lichinochnoy rakoviny u kembriyskih lingulid [On the larval shell structure of the Cambrian lingulids]. Doklady Akademii Nauk, 378, 375-378. [In Russian]
  • 64. WANG CHENGYUAN. 1990. Some Llandovery phosphatic microfossils from South China. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 29, 548-556. [In Chinese with English summary]
  • 65. WRONA, R. 1982. Early Cambrian phosphatic microfossils from southern Spitsbergen (Horsund region). Palaeontologia Polonica, 43, 9-16.
  • 66. - 1987. Cambrian microfossil Hadimopanella Gedik from glacial erratics in West Antarctica. In: A. GAŹDZICKI (Ed.), Paleontological results of the Polish Antarctic Expeditions. Part I. Palaeontologia Polonica, 49, 37-48.
  • 67. - 1989. Cambrian limestone erratics in the Tertiary sediments of King George Island, West Antarctica. Polish Polar Research, 10, 533- 553.
  • 68. - 2004. Cambrian microfossils from glacial erratics of King George Island, Antarctica. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 49, 13-56.
  • 69. WRONA, R. & HAMDI, B. 2000. Middle Cambrian Hadimopanella from Mila Formation in the Alborz Mountains, northern Iran. In: ACEπOLAZA, G.F. & PERALTA, S. (Eds), Cambrian from the southern edge. Instituto Superior de Correlación Geológica (INSUGEO), Miscelánea, 6, 143-146. San Miguel de Tucumán.
  • 70. - & - 2001. Palaeoscolecid sclerites from the Upper Cambrian Mila Formation of the Shahmirzad section, Alborz Mountains, northern Iran. Acta Geologica Polonica, 51, 101-107.
  • 71. ZHANG XIGUANG & PRATT, B. R. 1996. Early Cambrian palaeoscolecid cuticles from Shaanxi, China. Journal of Paleontology, 70, 275-279. Lawrence.
  • 72. ZHURAVLEV, A. Yu. 1998. Outlines of the Siberian Platform sequence stratigraphy in the Lower and Middle Cambrian (Lena-Aldan area). Revista Española de Paleontología no extr. Homenaje al Prof. Gonzalo Vidal, 105-114. Madrid.
  • 73. ZHURAVLEV, A. YU. & WOOD, R. A. 1996. Anoxia as the cause of the mid-Early Cambrian (Botoman) extinction event. Geology, 24, 311-314.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BGPK-0638-2775
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.