Abundance, biomass and density boundaries in the Hymenoptera : analysis of the abundance - weight relationship and differences between forest and open landscape habitats

• Autorzy: Ulrich W.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The density - weight distributions of the hymenopteran species in a beech forest on limestone and a dry meadow on limestone near Gottingen (FRG) were studied. Species and density distributions (logarithmic size classes) turned out to follow normal and log-normal distributions with the meadow having the more narrow shape. Upper weight classes accumulated more total biomass m^-2 than lower ones, resulting in a rejection of the equal biomass hypothesis in the case of the Hymenoptera. An analysis of the density - weight relationship revealed an upper density boundary for the hymenopteran species which can be defined by second order polynomial functions. Mean and upper densities of small hymenopteran species ranged well below their boundaries, with an asymptotic relationship between distance from the boundary and species weight. The area defined by the boundaries may mark the area of stability: exceeding the species specific boundary was always followed by a marked decline oreven a collapse of population density.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

biomass; boundedness; density - weight distribution; density; Hymenoptera; species - weight class distribution; weight

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 1999
• Tom: Vol. 47, no 1
• Strony: 73--86
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Ulrich W.

• Nicholas Copernicus University in Toruń Department of Animal Ecology, Gagarina 9, 87-100 Toruń: Poland

Bibliografia

• [1]. Basset Y., Kitching R. L. 1991 - Species number, species abundance and body length of arboreal arthropods associated with an Australian rainforest tree - Ecol. Entomol. 16: 391-402.
• [2]. Blackburn T.M.,Lawton J.H, Perry J. N. 1992 - A method of estimating the slope of upper bounds of plots of body size and abundance in natural animal assemblages - Oikos 65: 107-112.
• [3]. Blackburn T. M., Gaston K. J. 1996 - Abundance - body size relationships: the area you census tells you more - Oikos 75: 303-309.
• [4]. Chesson P. 1978 - Predator-prey theory and variability - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 9: 323-347.
• [5]. Chesson P., Ellner S. 1989 - Invasibility and stochastic boundedness in monotonie competition models - J. Math. Biol. 27: 117-138.
• [6]. Crowley P. H. 1992 - Density dependence, boundedness, and attraction: detecting stability in stochastic systems - Oecologia 90: 246-254.
• [7]. Currie D. J. 1993 - What shape is the relationship between body mass and population density - Oikos 66: 353.
• [8]. Currie D. J., Fritz J. T. 1993 - Global patterns of animal abundance and species energy use - Oikos 67: 56-68.
• [9]. Cyr H., Peters R.H., Downing J.A. 1997 - Population density and community size structure: comparison of aquatic and terrestrial systems - Oikos 80: 139-149.
• [10]. Damuth J. 1981 - Population density and body size in mammals - Nature 230: 699-700.
• [11]. Damuth J. 1987 - Interspecific allometry of population density in mammals and other animals: the independence of body mass and population energy-use - Bio. J. Linn. Soc. 31: 193-246.
• [12]. Den Boer P.J., Reddingius J. 1989- On the stabilization of animal numbers. Problems of testing 2. Confrontation with data from the field - Oecologia 79: 143-149.
• [13]. Gaston K. J. 1988 - Patterns in the local and regional dynamics of moth populations - Oikos 53: 49-57.
• [14]. Gaston K. J. 1993 - Comparing animals and automobiles: a vehicle for understanding body size and abundance relationships in species assemblages? - Oikos 66: 172-179.
• [15]. Gaston K. J., Lawton J. H. 1988 - Patterns in the distribution and abundance of insect populations - Nature 331: 709-712.
• [16]. Griffiths D. 1992 - Size, abundance, and energy use in communities - J. Animal Ecol. 61: 307-315.
• [17]. Hövemeyer K. 1992 - Population studies of Cheilosia fasciata (Diptera: Syrphidae), a leaf miner of Allium ursinum - Ecol. Entomol. 17: 331-337.
• [18]. Hövemeyer K. 1996 - Die Dipterengemeinschaften eines Halbtrockenrasens und einer Hecke im sadniedersachsischen Bergland: eine vergleichende Untersuchung - Drosera '96: 113-127.
• [19]. Lawton J. H. 1989 - What is the relationship between population density and body size in animals - Oikos 55: 429-434.
• [20]. Lawton J. H. 1990 - Species richness and population dynamics of animal assemblages. Patterns in body-size: abundance space - Phil. Tans. R. Soc. Lond. B 330: 283-291.
• [21]. May R. M. 1978 - The dynamics and diversity of insect faunas (In: Diversity of insect faunas, Eds. L.A. Mound & N. Waloff) - Oxford, pp. 188-204.
• [22]. May R. M. 1986 - The search for patterns in the balance of nature: advances and retreats - Ecology 67: 1115-1126.
• [23]. Maurer B. A., Brown J. H. 1988 - Distribution of energy use and biomass among species of North American terrestrial birds - Ecology 69: 1923-1932.
• [24]. Morse D. R, Stork N. E., Lawton J. H. 1988 - Species number, species abundance and body length relationships of arboreal beetles in Bornean lowland rain forest trees - Ecol. Entomol. 13: 25-37.
• [25]. Nee S., Read A. F., Greenwood J. J. D., Harvey P. 1991 - The relationship between abundance and body size in British birds - Nature 351: 312-313.
• [26]. Novotny V., Kindlmann P. 1996 - Distribution of body sizes in arthropod taxa and communities - Oikos 75: 75-82.
• [27]. Peters R. H. 1983 - The ecological implications of body size - Cambridge.
• [28]. Peters R. H., Raelson J. V. 1984 - Relations between individual size and mammalian population density - Am. Nat. 124: 498-517.
• [29]. Pollard E., Lakhani K. H., Rothery P. 1987 - The detection of density-dependence from a series of annual censuses - Ecology 68: 2046-2055.
• [30]. Reddingius J., Den Boer P. J. 1989 - On the stabilization of animal numbers. Problems of testing. 1. Power estimates and estimation errors - Oecologia 78: 1-8.
• [31]. Schaefer M. 1991 - Fauna of the European temperate deciduous forest (In: Temperate deciduous forests, Eds. E. Rtihrig, B. Ulrich) - Ecosystems of the world 7, Amsterdam, pp. 503-525.
• [32]. Schaefer M. 1996 - Die Bodenfauna von Waldern: Biodiversitat in einem tikologischen System - Abh. Math -Naturw. Klasse 1996,2, Stuttgart.
• [33]. Scharf S. F., Juanes F., Sutherland M. 1998 - Inferring ecological relationships from the edges of scatter diagrams: comparisons of regression techniques - Ecology 79: 448-460.
• [34]. Stork N. E., Blackburn T. M. 1993 - Abundance, body size and biomass of arthropods in tropical forest - Oikos 67: 483-489.
• [35]. Strayer D. 1986 - The size structure of a lacustrine zoobenthic community - Oecologia 69: 513-515.
• [36]. Tokeshi M. 1990 - Density - body size allometry does not exist in a chironomid community on Myriophyllum - Freshwater Biol. 24: 613-618.
• [37]. Ulrich W. 1998 - The parasitic Hymenoptera in a beech forest on limestone I: Species composition, species turnover, abundance and biomass - Pol. J. Ecol. 3: 261-289
• [38]. Ulrich W. 1999a - The Hymenoptera of a dry meadow on limestone: Species composition, abundance and biomass - Pol. J. Ecol. 47: 29-47.
• [39]. Ulrich W. 1999b - The density - weight and the biomass - weight distribution can be generated by the species - weight distribution together with density fluctuations: evidence from model species distributions in the Hymenoptera - Pol. J. Ecol. 47: 87-101.
• [40]. Ulrich W. 1999c - Morphology and ecology in the parasitic Hymenoptera: analysis of three morphological parameters and their relation to ecological factors - Pol. J. Ecol. 47: 49-72.