PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

A validated densitometric method for analysis of aceclofenac and paracetamol as the bulk drugs and in combined tablet dosage forms

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
A simple, specific, accurate, and precise high-performance thin-layer chromatographic method for analysis of aceclofenac and paracetamol in combined tablet dosage forms is reported in this paper. The method uses aluminium plates coated with silica gel 60 F254 as stationary phase and ethyl acetate-n-butanol-glacial acetic acid 7.5:2.5:0.005 (v/v) as mobile phase. Densitometric evaluation of the separated bands was performed at 270 nm. The two drugs were satisfactorily resolved with RF values 0.29 š 0.019 and 0.74 š 0.025 for aceclofenac and paracetamol, respectively. The respective calibration plots were linear over the ranges 50-1000 and 200-1500 ng per band. Intra-day variation, as RSD (%), was 0.420 š 0.282 for aceclofenac and 0.354 š 0.212 for paracetamol. Interday variation, as RSD (%) š SE, was 0.57 š 0.41 for aceclofenac and 0.90 š 1.09 for paracetamol. The method, which was validated in accordance with ICH guidelines, can be used for analysis of ten or more formulations on a single plate and is a rapid and costeffective quality-control tool for routine simultaneous analysis of aceclofenac and paracetamol in combined dosage forms.
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Strony
175--182
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 19 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
autor
Bibliografia
  • [1] J.E.F. Reynolds and B.A. Prasad, Martindale – The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 30th edn, The Pharmaceutical Press, London, 1993
  • [2] European Pharmacopoeia, 4th edn, Council of Europe, Strasbourg cedex, France, 2002
  • [3] N.M. EI Kousy, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 20, 184 (1999)
  • [4] N.M. EI Kousy, N.H. Zawilla, A.A. Mohammad, and S.M. El-Moghazy, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 27, 243 (2002)
  • [5] S. Shanmugam, A.K. Cendil, J. Vetrichelvan, R. Manavalan, D. Venkappayya, and V.P. Pandey, Indian Drugs, 42, 106 (2005)
  • [6] Y.S. Saharty, M. Refaat, and S.Z. el-Khateeb, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 28, 571 (2002)
  • [7] British Pharmacopoeia, Vol. 1, International edn, HMSO, London, 1993
  • [8] Indian Pharmacopoeia, Vol. 2, 4th edn, Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 1996
  • [9] E. Dinc, C. Yucesoy, and F. Onur, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 28, 1092 (2002)
  • [10] S. Ravisankar, M. Vasudevan, S. Mathew, and B. Suresh, Indian Drugs, 35, 306 (1998)
  • [11] P. Nagaraja, K.C. Murthy, and K.S. Rangapa, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 17, 501 (1998)
  • [12] E. Dinc, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 21, 723 (1999)
  • [13] N. Erk and Y. Ozkan, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 24, 469 (2001)
  • [14] S.S. Zarapkar, U.P. Halkar, and N.P. Bhandari, Indian Drugs, 36, 710 (1999)
  • [15] K.R.P. Shenoy, K.S. Krishnamurthi, and K.S. Sumatheendra, Indian Drugs, 37, 486 (2000)
  • [16] D. Patil and B. Raman, Indian Drugs, 38, 36 (2001)
  • [17] J.O. Maryadele and A. Smith, The Merck Index 12th edn, Merck Research Laboratories, NJ, USA, 1996
  • [18] A.D. Nikam, S.S. Pawar, and S.V. Gandhi, Asian J. Chem., 19, 5075 (2007)
  • [19] ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline, Q2 (R1), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, November, 2005.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BATE-0001-0015
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.