Web Services composition - from ontology to plan by query

• Autorzy: Doliwa D. , Horzelski W. , Jarocki M. , Niewiadomski A. , Penczek W. , Półrola A. , Szreter M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper proposes a method to cover the world of web services with a uniform semantics, possibly simple but enabling to arrange complex flows of service invocations. The flows are built according to fully declarative user's intentions, specified in a language common for the descriptions of services and for the query. In the approach we model the world of services and of the subjects they operate on using a uniform knowledge database and an objectoriented manner. The current work describes the first phase of the composition: making an abstract plan, i.e., giving an answer how (with what types of services) the required effect can be obtained. The problem of creating a plan is converted to building a specialized graph.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

automated composition; web services; abstract planning

• Wydawca: Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Control and Cybernetics
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: Vol. 40, no 2
• Strony: 315--336
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz., il.

Twórcy

autor

Doliwa D.

autor

Horzelski W.

autor

Jarocki M.

autor

Niewiadomski A.

autor

Penczek W.

autor

Półrola A.

autor

Szreter M.

• Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Łódź, Poland

Bibliografia

• Ambroszkiewicz, S. (2003) EnTish: An Approach to Service Description and Composition. ICS PAS, Warsaw.
• Bell,M. (2008) Introduction to Service-Oriented Modeling. JohnWiley & Sons.
• DAML-S (2003) DAML-S (and OWL-S) 0.9 Draft Release. http://www.daml.org/services/daml-s/0.9/.
• Doliwa, D., Horzelski, W., Jarocki, M., Niewiadomski, A., Penczek, W., Półrola, A., Szreter, M., and Zbrzezny, A. (2010) Web Service Composition Toolset. In: Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Concurrency, Specification and Programming (CS&P’10). Informatik-Berichte, 237 (1), Humboldt University, 131-141.
• Jarocki, M., Niewiadomski, A., Penczek,W., Półrola, A. and Szreter, M. (2010a) A Formal Approach to Composing Abstract Scenarios of Web Services. In: Proc. of the 18th Int. Conf. Intelligent Information Systems (IIS 2010). Wydawnictwo Akademii Podlaskiej, Siedlce, 3-22.
• Jarocki, M., Niewiadomski, A., Penczek,W., Półrola, A. and Szreter, M. (2010b) Towards Automatic Composition of Web Services: Abstract Planning Phase. Technical Report 1017, ICS PAS, Warsaw.
• Klusch, M., Gerber, A. and Schmidt, M. (2005) Semantic Web Service Composition Planning with OWLS-XPlan. In: Proc. of the 1st Int. AAAI Fall Symposium on Agents and the Semantic Web. AAAI Press, 55-62.
• McDermott, D., Ghallab, M., Howe, A., Knoblock, C., Ram, A., Veloso, M., Weld, D. and Wilkins, D. (1998) PDDL - The Planning Domain Definition Language - Version 1.2. Technical Report TR-98-03, Yale Center for Computational Vision and Control.
• Penczek, W., Półrola, A. and Zbrzezny, A. (2010) Towards Automatic Composition of Web Services: A SAT-Based Phase. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Workshop on Abstractions for Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency and of the Int. Workshop on Scalable and Usable Model Checking (APNOC’10 + SUMO’10). University of Minho, Braga, 76-96.
• Ponnekanti, S.R. and Fox, A. (2002) SWORD: A Developer Toolkit for Web Service Composition. In: Proc. of The Eleventh World Wide Web Conference (Web Engineering Track), Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 83-107. http://radlab.cs.berkeley.edu/people/fox/static/pubs/pdf/c09.pdf.
• Rao, J. (2004) Semantic Web Service Composition via Logic-Based Program Synthesis. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Comp. and Inf. Sci., Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
• Rao, J., Küngas, P. and Matskin, M. (2004) Logic-basedWeb Services Composition: From Service Description to Process Model. In: Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Web Services (ICWS’04). IEEE Computer Society, 446-453.
• Rao, J. and Su, X. (2004) A Survey of Automated Web Service Composition Methods. In: Proc. of the 1st Int. Workshop on Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition (SWSWPC’04). LNCS 3387, Springer-Verlag, 43-54.
• Redavid, D., Iannone, L. and Payne, T. (2008) OWL-S Atomic Services Composition with SWRL Rules. In: Proc. of the 4th Italian Semantic Web Workshop: Semantic Web Applications and Perspectives (SWAP’07). CEUR Workshop Proceedings 314, CEUR-WS.org, 51-60.
• Sirin, E., Hendler, J. and Parsia, B. (2003) Semi-automatic Compositions ofWeb Services Using Semantic Description. In: Proc. of the Int.Workshop ‘Web Services: Modeling, Architecture and Infrastructure’ (WSMAI’03). ICEIS Press, 17-24.
• SOAP (2007) SOAP Version 1.2. http://www.w3.org/TR/soap.
• Srivastava, B. and Koehler, J. (2003) Web Service Composition - Current Solutions and Open Problems. In: Proc. of the Int. ICAPS 2003 Workshop on Planning for Web Services. AAAI, 28-35.
• UDDI (2005) Universal Description, Discovery and Integration v3.0.2 (UDDI). http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/uddi-spec /doc/spec/v3/ uddi-v3.0.2-20041019.htm.
• WS-BPEL (2007) Web Services Business Process Execution Language v2.0. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/OS/wsbpel-v2.0-OS.html.
• WSDL (2001) Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1. http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-wsdl-20010315.