Success Factors for SOA Implementation in Network Centric Environment

• Autorzy: Śliwa J. , Amanowicz M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper discusses challenges and success factors for service oriented architecture (SOA) implementation in network centric environment. The authors identify 9 fundamental challenges for the SOA approach in order to make the biggest benefit for the NATO NEC (NNEC) and increase the mission effectiveness to the highest extent. They cover the areas of applicability to existing military communications and the ability to reflect military processes. Their range is quite broad, pointing out technological as well as SOA governmental problems. The authors emphasize that any COTS solution available on the market today is able to overcome all of them at once. However, they propose solutions to some of the problems and present quick wins that can speed up the process of achieving capabilities in a heterogeneous multinational NEC environment.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

NEC; SOA challanges; SOA success factors; tactical networks

• Wydawca: Instytut Łączności - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
• Czasopismo: Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology
• Rocznik: 2011
• Tom: nr 1
• Strony: 43--53
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Śliwa J.

autor

Amanowicz M.

• Military Communication Institute, Warszawska st 22A, 05-130 Zegrze, Poland,

Bibliografia

• [1] P. Bartolomasi, T. Buckman, A. Campbell, J. Grainger, J. Mahaffey, R. Marchand, O. Kruidhof, C. Shawcross, and K. Veum, NATO Network-Centric Operational Needs and Implications for the Development of Net-Centric Solutions, vol. 1 of NATO Network Enabled Capability Feasibility Study, version 2.0, NATO C3 Agency, 2004/2005.
• [2] “NNEC Data Strategy”, Headquarters, Supreme Allied Commander Transformation, IS-NNEC IPT, September 2004.
• [3] G. Babakhani, J. Busch, C. Dumas, R. Fiske, B. Holden, H. Lagreid, R. Malewicz, D. Marco-Mompel, and V. Rodriguez-Herola, “Web trends and technologies and NNEC core enterprise services”, version 2.0, Technical Note 1143, NATO C3 Agency, The Hague, Dec. 2006.
• [4] M. Booth, T. Buckman, J. Busch, B. Caplan, B. Christiansen, R. van Engelshoven, K. Eckstein, G. Hallingstad, T. Halmai, P. Howland, V. Rodriguez-Herola, D. Kallgren, S. Onganer, R. Porta, C. Shawcross, P. Szczucki, and K. Veum, Detailed Report Covering a Strategy and Roadmap for Realizing an NNEC Networking and Information Infrastructure, vol. II of NATO Network Enabled Feasibility Study, version 2.0, NATO C3 Agency, June 2005.
• [5] R. Haakseth, T. Gagnes, D. Hadzic, T. Hafsoe, F. T. Johnsen, K. Lund, and B. K. Reitan, “SOA – Cross Domain and Disadvantaged Grids”, NATO CWID 2007, FFI-rapport 2007/02301, Norwegian Defence Research Establishment.
• [6] C. M. MacKenzie, K. Laskey, F. McCabe, P. F. Brown, R. Metz, Booz, and A. Hamilton, “Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0”, OASIS Standard, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://docs.oasis-open.org/soa-rm/v1.0/soa-rm.html
• [7] “NC3A Technical Architecture” [Online]. Available: http://nc3ta.nc3a.nato.int/website/home.asp?msg=logreq
• [8] A. Nadalin, C. Kaler, R. Monzillo, and P. Hallam-Baker, “Web Services Security: 4 SOAP Message Security 1.1 (WS-Security 2004)”, OASIS Standard Specification, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/16790/wss-v1.1-spec-os-SOAPMessageSecurity.pdf
• [9] M. Bartel, J. Boyer, B. Fox, B. LaMacchia, and E. Simon, “XML Signature Syntax and Processing (Second Edition)”, W3C Recom- mendation, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/
• [10] E. Maler et al., “Assertions and Protocols for the OASIS Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V1.1”, OASIS Standard, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/3406/oasis-sstc-saml-core-1.1.pdf
• [11] O. Winberg, “SOA for NBD: principles and considerations”, Forsvarets Materialverk, 2006.
• [12] O. Winberg, “Overarching architecture for FMLS 2010 technical system”, Forsvarets Materialverk, 2006.
• [13] O. Winberg, “Deign Rule: legacy integration”, Forsvarets Materialverk, 2006.
• [14] “Information Management over Disadvantaged Grids”, Techn. Rep. RTO-TR-IST-030, AC/323( )
• [15] J. Busch, “An investigation into deploying Web services”, TN–1229, NATO C3 Agency, Dec. 2007.
• [16] R. Haakseth, D. Hadzic, K. Lund, A. Eggen, and R. E. Rasmussen, “Experiences from implementing dynamic and secure web services”, in Proc. 11th ICCRTS, Cambridge, UK, 2006
• [17] T. Hafsoe, F. T. Johnsen, K. Lund, and A. Eggen, “Adapting web service publish/subscribe technologies for use in NEC C2 Systems”, in Proc. 12th ICCRTS Conf., Newport, USA, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.dodccrp.org/events/12th ICCRTS/CD/Launch CD.html
• [18] F. T. Johnsen, A. Eggen, T. Hafsoe, and K. Lund, “Utilizing military message handling systems as a transport mechanism for SOA in military tactical networks”, in Proc. IST 083 Symp., Prague, Czech Republic, 2008.
• [19] K. Lund, A. Eggen, D. Hadzic, T. Hafsoe, and F. T. Johnsen, “Using web services to realize service oriented architecture in military communication networks”, IEEE Commun. Mag., Oct., pp. 47–53, 2007.
• [20] “Interim NFFI Standard for Interoperability of FTS”, AC322(SC5)N(2006)0025, NC3B Information Systems SC, 16 Dec. 2006.
• [21] “Data Distribution Service for Real-time Systems Version 1.2”, OMG Available Specification, Jan. 2007.
• [22] R. Faucher, R. Ladysz, D. Miller, S. Musman, S. Raparla, and D. Smith, “Guidance on proxy servers fpr the tactical edge”, DoD C3I FFRDC, The Mitre Corporation, Sept. 2006.
• [23] E. Skjervold, T. Hafsoe, F. T. Johnsen, and K. Lund, “Delay and disruption tolerant web services for heterogeneous networks”, in Proc. MILCOM, Boston, USA, 2009.
• [24] J. Śliwa and D. Duda, “Adaptive web services supported by Qos IP network”, in Proc. Military Commun. Inf. Syst. Conf., Prague, Czech Republic, 2009, pp. 448–456 (MK-291).