PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Hearing loss in workers exposed to different type of noise

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Konferencja
XIV International Conference Noise Control'07 (3-6.06.2007, Elbląg, Poland)
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
It's well documented that noise damages peripheral part of the auditory tract (cochlea). Only few investigations were performed to assess central hearing disturbances caused by noise on animal. The aim of the study was to evaluate the site of hearing damage in 2 groups of individuals exposed to different types of noise. First group consisted of 62 dockyard workers exposed to impulsive noise with co-exposure to hand-arm vibration while second group included 76 bottle glass factory workers exposed to continuous steady-state noise. Results were referred to 86 control subjects exposed neither to noise nor vibrations. Pure-tone audiometry, immitance audiometry, Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) and cognitive-event relate auditory evoked potentials (wave P-300) were performed in all subjects. Audiometric results revealed the poorest hearing level in dockyard workers among all groups. The bottle factory workers had also significant hearing impairment at high frequencies as compared to controls. Although the wave V at the ABR was prolonged in the dockyard workers this change could reflect sensorineural hearing thresholds shift and retrocochlear damage. The latency of P-300 wave was prolonged in dockyard workers exclusively suggesting a cortical effect of exposure to impulsive noise. Conclusions. Exposure to high level impulsive noise in combination with hand-arm vibration may cause hearing deficit greater than expected. Abnormalities involve peripheral and central auditory system. More observations are necessary to confirm these findings.
Rocznik
Strony
399--404
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 9 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
autor
autor
  • Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Department of Physical Hazards, Św. Teresy 8, 91-348 Łódź, Poland, zamysewa@imp.lodz.pl
Bibliografia
  • [1] MUSIEK F. E., BARAN J. A., PINOHEIRO M. I., P300 results in patients with lesion of the auditory areas of the cerebrum, JAAA, 3, 5.15 (1992).
  • [2] BABISCH W., The noise/stress concept, risk assessment and research needs, Noise and Health, 4, 16, 1.11 (2002).
  • [3] OLESHKEVICH L. A., SHABUNINA N. D., Effect of noise of moderate intensity on the functional status of the sympathetic-adrenal system, Gig Sanit., 12, 93.95. (1989).
  • [4] CERQUEIRA J. J. et al., The prefrontal cortex as a key target of the maladaptive response to stress, J. Neurosci., Mar 14; 27, 11, 2781.2787 (2007)
  • [5] GOMES L.M., PIMENTA M., BRANCO C., Effects of occupational exposure to low frequency noise on cognition, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 70, A115-8. (1999).
  • [6] STARCK J., TOPPILA E., PYYKKO I., Impulse noise and risk criteria, Noise Health, 5, 20, 63.73 (2003).
  • [7] NOORHASSIM I., KAGA K., NISHIMURA K., Pure-tone audiometry and auditory brainstem responses in noise-induced deafness, Am. J. Otolaryngol., 17, 1, 31.35 (1996)
  • [8] HALL J.W., RUPP K. A., Auditory brainstem response: recent developments in recording and analysis, Adv. Otorhinolaryngol., 53, 21.45 (1997)
  • [9] FJELL A., WALHOVD K. B., Effects of auditory stimulus intensity and hearing threshold on the relationship among P300, age, and cognitive function, Clinical Nerophysiology, 114, 799.807 (2003).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BAT8-0009-0048
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.