Selected quasi-lexical and non-lexical units in Polish map task dialogues

• Autorzy: Karpiński M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The present study is focused on selected types of fillers, quasi-words and non-lexical words that are generally categorized as expressing positive or negative response in Polish task-oriented dialogues. Basic phonetic properties of such units are analyzed with a special focus on intonation. Some of their possible realizations are shown and some relations between their intonational form and meaning are hypothesized. A brief note on comparative background from our recent work is also provided and some implications for speech technology are mentioned.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

dialogue; intonation

• Wydawca: Instytut Podstawowych Problemów Techniki PAN ; Komitet Akustyki PAN ; Polskie Towarzystwo Akustyczne
• Czasopismo: Archives of Acoustics
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: Vol. 32, No. 1
• Strony: 51--65
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Karpiński M.

• Adam Mickiewicz University, Institute of Linguistics, Międzychodzka 5, 60-371 Poznań, Poland,

Bibliografia

• [1] BARD E. G., LICKLEY R. J., On not Remembering Disfluencies, Proc. Eurospeech 97, Rhodes, pp. 2855.2858, 1997.
• [2] BOERSMA P., WENINK D., Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 4.3.16), [Computer program], Retrieved June 22, 2005, from http://www.praat.org/.
• [3] BYRON D. K., HEEMAN P. A., Discourse marker use in task-oriented spoken dialog, Proc. Eurospeech 97, pp. 2223.2226, 1997.
• [4] CARLETTA J., ISARD A., ISARD S., KOWTKO J., DOHERTY.SNEDDON G., ANDERSON A., HCRC dialogue structure coding manual, Human Communications Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, HCRC TR . 82, 1996.
• [5] CARLSON L., Dialogue Games: An approach to discourse analysis, D. Reidel, Boston 1983.
• [6] CRISTEA D., WEBBER B., Expectations in Incremental Discourse Processing, Proc. the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Madrid 1997.
• [7] FISCHER K., WREDE B., Discourse particles in female and male human-computer-interaction, Proceedings of Women into Computing, Intellect Press, Exeter 1997.
• [8] GOLDMAN.EISLER F., Hesitation and information in speech, [in:] Information Theory, C. Cherry [Ed.], pp. 162.174, Butterworth, London 1961.
• [9] GUSSENHOVEN C., Intonation and Interpretation: Phonetics and Phonology, [in:] Speech Prosody 2002, B. Bel, I. Marlien [Eds.], pp. 47.57, 2002.
• [10] GUSSENHOVEN C., The Phonology of Tone and Intonation, CUP, Cambridge 2004.
• [11] KARPIŃSKI M., KLEŚTA J., SZALKOWSKA E., Non- and Quasi-lexical Realizations of .Positive Response. in Korean, Polish and Thai, [in:] Pro. Speech Prosody Conference, R. Hoffmann, H.-J. Mixdorff [Eds.], Dresden, PS7-16-133, 2006.
• [12] KARPIŃSKI M., KLEŚTA J., The project of an intonational database for the Polish language, [in:] Prosody 2000, St. Puppel, G. Demenko [Eds.], Wydział Neofilologii UAM, pp. 113.118, Poznań, 2001.
• [13] KREUTEL J., MATHESON C., Obligations, intentions, and the notion of conversational games, [in:] Information States, Obligations and Intentional Structure in Dialogue Modelling, Proc. the 3rd International Workshop on Human-Computer Conversation, Bellagio 2000.
• [14] KIM J., Automatic Detection of Sentence Boundaries, Disuencies, and Conversational Fillers in Spontaneous Speech, MSc Thesis, University of Washington, 2004.
• [15] LICKLEY R. J., BARD E. G., On not Recognizing Disfluencies in Dialogue, Proceedings of the ICSLP, Philadelphia 1996.
• [16] LICKLEY R. J., Missing Dis_uencies, Proc. the ICPhS, Stockholm, 4, 192.195, 1995.
• [17] LICKLEY R. J., Juncture Cues to Dis_uency, Proc. the ICSLP, Philadelphia 1996.
• [18] MANN W. C., Dialogue Games, USC Information Sciences Institute, Marina del Rey, CA, ISI/RR-79-77, 1979.
• [19] MANN W. C., Models of Intentions in Language, 5th Workshop on Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Bielefeld 2001.
• [20] MANN W. C., Dialogue Macrogame Theory, SIGdial Workshop 2002, Philadelphia 2002.
• [21] MÖBIUS B., Rare Events and Closed Domains: Two Questionable Concepts in Speech Synthesis, [in:] Research Papers from the Phonetics Lab, 6, 4, 119.134 (2000).
• [22] OWEN M., Conversational units and the use of `well...', [in:] Conversation and Discourse: Structure and Interpretation, Paul Werth [Ed.], St. Martin's Press, pp. 99.116, 1981.
• [23] ROSE R. L., The communicative value of filled pauses in spontaneous speech, MA Thesis, University of Birmingham, 1998.
• [24] SCHIFFRIN D., Conversational coherence: The role of 'well', Language: Journal of the Linguistic Society of America, 61, 3, 640.665 (1985).
• [25] SCHIFFRIN D., Discourse markers, CUP, Cambridge 1987.
• [26] SWERTS M., WICHMANN A., BEUN R., Filled pauses as markers of discourse structure, Proc. ICSLP, 1033.1036, 1996.
• [27] TRAUM D. R., ALLEN F. J., Discourse obligations in dialogue processing, Proc. ACL '94, P94-1001, 1994.
• [28] TRAUM D. R., HEEMAN P. A., Utterance units in spoken dialogue, [in:] Dialogue Processing in Spoken Language Systems, E. Maier, M. Mast and S. Luperfoy [Eds.], Springer-Verlag, pp. 125. 140, Heidelberg 1997.
• [29] WARD N., Non-Lexical Conversational Sounds in American English, Pragmatics and Cognition, 14, 1, 129.182 (2006).