Jakość usług w sektorze publicznym a forma własności

• Autorzy: Bugdol M.

Warianty tytułu

EN

The quality of public services and form of ownership

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

This paper presents the problems connected with the form of ownership and quality of public services. The author identifies the main strong and weak points of privatizations and condition of successful privatizations, describes relations between quality of services and quality of life. The importance of the public motivation is considered.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

jakość usług; prywatyzacja usług publicznych

EN

quality; service; public service

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo SIGMA-NOT
• Czasopismo: Problemy Jakości
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: R. 41, nr 4
• Strony: 18--22
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Bugdol M.

Bibliografia

• 1. Amirkhanyan, A. (2008): Privatizing Public Nursing Homes: Examining the Effects on Quality and Access, "Public Administration Review", Vol. 68 Issue 4, p665-680.
• 2. Atterhög M.(2005):Increased Competition in the Swedish Housing Market and Its Effect on Rents and Quality of Housing Services for Households, "Housing, Theory & Society", Vol. 22 Issue l, p32-49.
• 3. Coetzee J.M. (2007): Dziennik złego roku, „Dziennik-Europa", nr 33 (176).
• 4. Crewson P.E. (1997): Public - Service Motivation: Building Empirical Evidence of Incidence and Effect, "Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory", Vol.7, Issue 4, p 499-519.
• 5. Feeny D.; Hanna S.; McEvay A.F.(1996): Questioning assumption of the „tragedy of the commons", „Land Economies", Vol. 2, Issue 72, p!87-206.
• 6. Goodman B.; Loveman G.W.(1991): Does Privatization Serve the Public Interest?," Harvard Business Review", Vol. 69 Issue 6, p 26-38.
• 7. Gollust, S.E.; Jacobson P.D.(2006): Privatization of Public Services: Organizational Reform Efforts in Public Education and Public Health," American Journal of Public Health", Vol. 96 Issue 10, p!733-1739.
• 8. Houston D.J. (2006):„Walking the Walk" of Public Service Motivation: Public Employees and Charitable Gifts of Time, Blood and Money, "Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory", Vol. 16, Issuel, p 67-86.
• 9. Liao, P. (2009): Parallels Between Objective Indicators and Subjective Perceptions of Quality of Life: A Study of Metropolitan and County Areas in Taiwan, "Social Indicators Research", Vol. 91 Issue l, p 99-114,
• 10. Mann G.A. (2006): A Motive To Serve: Public Service Motivation in Human Resource Management and the Role of PSM in the Nonprofit Sector, "Public Personnel Management" ,Vol. 35 ,Issue 1.
• 11. Michalos A.C. ; Orlando J.A. (2006) : Quality of Life of Some Under-Represented Survey Respondents: Youth, Aboriginals and Unemployed, "Social Indicators Research", Vol. 79, Issue 2, p!91-213.
• 12. Miranda, R.; Lerner, A.(1995): Bureaucracy, organizational redundancy, and the privatization of public services," Public Administration Review", Vol. 55 Issue 2, p!93-202.
• 13. Niskansen W.(2009): Im więcej prywatnych instytucji tym lepiej, "Forum Polska" z dn.17-18.01.2009.
• 14. Radwan A. (2008): Prywatyzacja potrzebna ale nie wszędzie pożądana. „Dziennik" z 9 maja 2008.
• 15. Reeves E.(1995):Privatizing local authority services in Ireland, "International Journal of Public Sector Management", Vol. 8 Issue 4/5, p48-59.
• 16. Rainey H.G. (1979): Perceptions of Incentives in Business and Government: Implications for Civil Service Reform, "Public Administration Review", Vol.39:5,p 440-448.
• 17. Rainey H.G. (1982): Reward Preferences among Public and Private Managers: In Search of the Service Ethic /American Re-view of Public Administration" ,Vol.l6, p 288-302.
• 18. Słownik socjologii i nauk społecznych, PWN, Warszawa 2004.
• 19. Swain D., Hollar D. (2003): Measuring Progress: Community Indicators and the Quality of Life. "International Journal of Public Administration ",Vol. 26, Issue7, p 789.