Use of CPTU data in clays/fine grained soils

• Autorzy: Powell J. J.M. , Lunne T.
• Konferencja: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on " Interpretation of in situ tests and sample disturbance of clays"
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The Piezocone test (CPTU) continues to gain in popularity as a result of its potential, particularly in clay soils. In order to have confidence in the interpretation of CPTU results in clay soils, it is vital that the test results are accurate and representative of the in situ soil conditions. This can be achieved by using equipment and procedures following the new International Reference Test Procedure (IRTP) (and in future the forthcoming ISO document on CPTU). A particular feature of the IRTP is the introduction of Accuracy Classes according to what the results are to be used for. This aspect is discussed in some detail. Testing on land is normally done by pushing from ground level until refusal or to a predetermined depth. A new and very interesting method whereby CPT’s can be carried out while drilling is advanced facilitates continuous testing to large depths. The rest of the paper covers the use of CPTU for engineering purposes in clays soils. The aspects that are dealt with are: layering and identification of soil type, stress history, lateral stress ratio, undrained and remoulded shear strength, small strain shear modulus, coefficient of consolidation and in situ pore pressure.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

glina; podłoże; badanie; CPTU test; IRTP; identyfikacja; typy gleb

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
• Rocznik: 2005
• Tom: Vol. 27, nr 3-4
• Strony: 29--65
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 51 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Powell J. J.M.

• Building Research Establishment, U.K.

autor

Lunne T.

• Norwegian Geotechnical Institute

Bibliografia

• [1] AAS G., LACASSE S., LUNNE T., MADSHUS C., In situ testing: new developments, Nordiska Geoteknikermotet, NGM-84, Linkőping, Sweden, 1984, Vol. 2, pp. 705–716, Swedish Geotechnical
• [2] BATTAGLIO M., JAMIOLKOWSKI, M., LANCELLOTTA, R., MANISCALCO, R., Piezometer probe test in cohesive deposits, Proc. Cone Penetration Testing and Experience; Session ASCE National Convention, St. Louis, 1981, pp. 264–302.
• [3] BEGEMANN H.K.S.Ph., Improved method of determining resistance to adhesion by sounding through a loose sleve placed behind the cone, Proc. 3rd ICSMFE, Zürich, 1953, Vol. 1, pp. 213–217.
• [4] BUTCHER A.P., POWELL J.J.M., The effect of geological history on the dynamic measurement of the stiffness of the ground, Proc. XI ECSMFE, Copenhagen, 1995, Vol. 1, pp. 27–36.
• [5] BUTCHER A.P., POWELL J.J.M., Deformation properties of soil from in situ and laboratory tests, Proc. XV ICSMGE, Istanbul, 2001, pp. 51–54.
• [6] CAMPANELLA R.G., GILLESPIE D., ROBERTSON P.K., Pore pressure during cone penetration testing, Proc. 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, ESOPT-II, Amsterdam, 1982, pp. 507–512.
• [7] CHEN B.S.-Y., MAYNE P.W., Statistical relationships between piezocone measurements and stress history of clays, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1996, 33(3), 488–498.
• [8] DE RUITER J., The static cone penetration test. State-of-the-art report, Proc. of the 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, ESOPT-II, Amsterdam, 1982, Vol. 2, pp. 389–405.
• [9] HERMANN S., JENSEN T.G., CPTU combined with block sampling gave cost saving solutions for Nykirke railway crossing (in Norwegian), Proc. Norwegian Geotechnical Day, Oslo, Nov. 2000, Paper No. 32.
• [10] HIRD C.C., JOHNSON P., SANGTIAN N., Performance of miniature piezocone in profiling thinly layered soil, Proc. XV ICSMGE, Istanbul, August 2001, pp. 113–116.
• [11] HOULSBY G.T., Piezocone penetration test, Proc Penetration Testing in the U.K., Geotechnology Conference, Birmingham, 1988, pp. 141–146.
• [12] HOULSBY G.T., TEH C.I., Analysis of the piezocone in clay, Proc. International Symposium on Penetration Testing, ISOPT-1, Orlando, 1988, Vol. 2, pp. 777–783.
• [13] ISSMGE International Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, International Reference Test Procedure for the Cone Penetration Test (CPT) and the Cone Penetration Test with Pore Pressure (CPTU). Report of the ISSMGE Technical Committee 16 on Ground Property Characterisation from In-situ Testing, Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Amsterdam, edited by Barends et al., Vol. 3, pp. 2195–2222.
• [14] JAMIOLKOWSKI M., GHIONNA V.N., LANCELLOTTA R., New correlations of penetration tests for design practice, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Penetration Testing, ISOPT-1, Orlando, 1, 263–96, Balkema Pub., Rotterdam, 1988.
• [15] JENSEN T.G., CPTU combined with block sampling resulted in cost saving technical solutions at Nykirke railway link, Proc. Young Geotechnical Engineers, Bulgaria, September, 2001.
• [16] KARLSRUD K., LUNNE T., BRATTLIEN K., Improved CPTU correlations based on block samples, Proc. Nordic Geotechnical Conference, Reykjavik, 1996, Vol. 1, pp. 195–201.
• [17] KONRAD J.M., LAW K., Preconsolidation pressure from piezocone tests in marine clays, Géotechnique, 1987, Vol. 37(2), pp. 177–190.
• [18] KVALSTAD T.J., NADIM F., KAYNIA A.M., MOKKELBOST K.H., BRYN P., Soil conditions and slope stability in the Ormen Lange area (in press in Marine and Petroleum Geology).
• [19] LEFEBVRE G., POULIN C., A new method of sampling in sensitive clay, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1979, Vol. 16, pp. 226–233.
• [20] LEROUEIL S., DEMERS D., LA ROCHELLE P., MARTEL G., VIRELY D., Practical use of the piezocone in Eastern Canada clays, Proc. International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT’95, Linköping, Sweden, 1995, Vol. 2, pp. 515–522.
• [21] LARSSON R., Use of a thin slot as filter in piezocone tests, Proc. International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT'95, Linköping, Sweden, 1995, Vol. 2, pp. 35–40.
• [22] LUNNE T., In situ testing in offshore geotechnical investigations, Proc. International Conference on In Situ Measurements of Soil Properties and Case Histories, Bali, May 21–24, 2001, pp. 61–82.
• [23] LUNNE T., CHRISTOPHERSEN H.P., TJELTA T.I., Engineering use of piezocone data in North Sea clays, Proc. 11th ICSMFE, San Francisco, 1985, Vol. 2, pp. 907–912.
• [24] LUNNE T., EIDSMOEN T., POWELL J.J.M., QUARTERMAN R.S.T., Piezocone testing in overconsolidated clays, Proc. of the 39th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, Ottawa, 1986, Preprint Volume, pp. 209–18, Canadian Geotechnical Society.
• [25] LUNNE T., ROBERTSON P.K., POWELL J.J.M., Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice, SponPress, London, 1997.
• [26] MAYNE P.W., Determination of OCR in clays by piezocone tests using cavity expansion and critical state concepts, Soils and Foundations, 1991, Vol. 31(2), pp. 65–76.
• [27] MAYNE P.W., HOLTZ R.D., Profiling stress history from piezocone soundings, Soils and Foundations, 1988, Vol. 28(1), pp. 16–28.
• [28] MAYNE P.W., RIX J.G., Gmax–qc relationships for clays, Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, 1993, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 54–60.
• [29] MESRI G., Undrained shear strength of soft clays from push cone penetration test, Geotechnique 51, 2001, No. 2, 167–168.
• [30] MOKKELBOST K.H., STRANDVIK S., Development of NGI’s Deepwater Gas Probe, DGP. Proc. Int. Conf. on Offshore and Nearshore Geotechnical Engineering, Geoshore, Panvel, India, December, 1999, pp. 107–112.
• [31] POWELL J.J.M., In situ testing and its value in characterising the UK National soft clay testbed site, Bothkennar, Proc. International Conf ‘Insitu 2001’, Bali, 2001, pp. 365–372
• [32] POWELL J.J.M., LUNNE T., A comparison of different sized piezocones in UK clays, Proc. XVI ICSMGE, Osaka, June 2005.
• [33] POWELL J.J.M., BUTCHER A.P., Assessment of ground stiffness from field and laboratory tests, Proc. X ECSMFE, Florence, 1991, pp. 153–156.
• [34] POWELL J.J.M., BUTCHER A.P., Small strain stiffness from CPT tests, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Site Characterisation (ISC2), Porto, 19–22 September, 2004, Millpress.
• [35] POWELL J.J.M., QUARTERMAN R.S.T., The interpretation of cone penetration tests in clays, with particular reference to rate effects, Proc. International Symposium on Penetration Testing, ISPT-1, Orlando, 1988, Vol. 2, pp. 903–910.
• [36] POWELL J.J.M., QUARTERMAN R.S.T., LUNNE T., Interpretation and use of piezocones in UK clays, Proc. Conf. on Penetration testing in the UK, Birmingham, 1988, pp. 151–156.
• [37] POWELL J.J.M., CLARKE B.G., SHIELDS C.H., CPT95 – National Report on UK Practice, Proc. International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing, CPT'95, Linköping, Sweden, October 1995, Vol. 1, pp. 253–262
• [38] PREVIATELLO P., COLA S., Geotechnical properties of silty alluvial soils from CPTU tests, Proc. International Conference on In Situ Measurements of Soil Properties and Case Histories, Bali, May 21–24, 2001, pp. 357–364.
• [39] ROBERTSON P.K., Soil classification using the cone penetration test, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1990, Vol. 27(1), pp. 151–158.
• [40] ROBERTSON P.K., SULLY J., WOELLER D.J., LUNNE T., POWELL J.J.M., GILLESPIE D.J., Estimating coefficient of consolidation from piezocone tests, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1992, Vol. 29(4), pp. 539–550.
• [41] ROBERTSON P.K., CAMPANELLA R.G., GILLESPIE D., GREIG, J., Use of piezometer cone data. Use of In Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, Proc ASCE Specialty Conference in Situ ’86, Blacksburg, 1986, pp. 1263–1280.
• [42] RUST E., The interpretation of incomplete piezocone dissipation tests, PhD, University of Surrey, 1996.
• [43] SACHETTO M., Personal communication, 2001.
• [44] SANDVEN R., WATN A., WESTERLUND G.J., The site investigation program for the Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, Norway: II. Use of in situ test results in design, Proc. of 1st International Conference on Site Characterization – ISC’98, Atlanta, April 1998, pp. 307–314.
• [45] SENNESET K., JANBU N., SVANØ G., Strength and deformation parameters from cone penetration tests, Proc. 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, ESOPT-II, Amsterdam, 1982, Vol. 2, pp. 863–870.
• [46] SULLY J.P., CAMPANELLA R.G., Effect of lateral stress on CPT penetration pore pressure, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 1991, Vol. 117(7), pp. 1082–1088.
• [47] SUTABUTR T., Analyses and interpretation of tapered piezoprobe and application to offshore pile design, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1999.
• [48] TAVENAS F., LEROUEIL S., State-of-the-art on laboratory and in situ stress–strain–time behaviour of soft clays, Proc. International Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering of Soft Soils, Mexico City, 1987, pp. 1–46.
• [49] TITI H.H., MOHAMMAD L.N., TUMAY M.T., Miniature cone penetration tests in soft and stiff clays, Geotechnical Testing Journal, GTJODJ, 2000, Vol. 23 (4), pp. 432–443.
• [50] TUMAY M.T., LIMA D.C., Calibration and implementation of miniature electric cone penetrometer and development, fabrication and verification of the lSU in situ calibration chamber, Report GE-92/08, 1992, Dept. of Civil Eng., Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
• [51] WROTH C.P., The interpretation of in situ soil test, 24th Rankine Lecture, Géotechnique, 1984, Vol.34(4), pp. 449–489.