PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Comparative evaluation of distributed Bandwidth Broker

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The Differentiated Services (DS) framework is one of the basic architectures that have been proposed for provision in the Internet. One of the most significant advantages of DS is ability to distinguish management plane of the network to provide the customer Quality of Service. A DS architecture proposed by IETF alone is not sufficient to address the end-to-end guaranties in a network layer but it does show great potential for scalability. To fulfill negotiated QoS services Bandwidth Broker - an additional management entity, has to be implemented. The main tasks of the Broker are: limiting the traffic volume carried through the managed domain and services nego-tiation on behalf of domain with customers and adjacent brokers. The authors concentrated on the concept of distributed Broker as a more scalable and efficient solution. The different bandwidth allocation scenarios are presented and compared with regard to signaling overhead, admission control delay and control complexity. The quota-based admission control algorithm has been briefly described and discussed. The new style of reservation has been proposed to decrease the amount of signaling traffic between core and edge routers. The example of its functioning has been given at the end of the presented paper.
Twórcy
  • Institute of Environmental Mechanics and Applied Computer, Science Kazimierz Wielki University Chodkiewicza 30, 85-072 Bydgoszcz, Poland, zmudzm@ukw.edu.pl
Bibliografia
  • [1] Barden R., at al, “Integrated Services in the Internet Architecture: an Overview”, RFC 16 33, June 1994.
  • [2] Blake S., at al., “An Architecture for Differentiated Service”, RFC2475, December 1998.
  • [3] Nichols K., at al., “A Two-bit Differentiated Services Architecture for the Internet”, RFC2638, July 1999.
  • [4] British Columbia Institute of Technology Burnaby Canada, “CA*netII differentiated service bandwidth broker high level design”, Technical Report 0.4, November 1998.
  • [5] “QBonc Bandwidth Broker Architecture”, QRone Signaling Design Team, http://qbone.internet2.edu/bb/bboutline2.html.
  • [6] Tery.is A., Ogawa J., Tsui S., Wang. L., Zhang L., “A Prototype Implementation of the Two-Tier Architecture for Differentiated Services”, appeared in RTAS99, Vancouver, Canada,1999.
  • [7] Kaczmarek S., Żmudziński P., „Koncepcja modelu do badań wydajności domeny IP QoS”, IX Poznańskie Warsztaty Telekomunikacyjne, Poznań 2005, pp. 188-193. Image Processing &; Communications, vol.11, no.l, pp.59-69
  • [8] Kaczmarek S., Żmudziński P., „Broker pasma jako element dynamicznego sterowania siecią Diffserv”, Internet - Wrocław 2005, 2005.
  • [9] “Bandwidth Broker Implementation”, Information and Technology Telecommunication Centre, University of Kansas, http://www. ittc. ukans. edu/ kdrao/BB/.
  • [10] Spence D., “Multidomain bandwidth broker model”, www. internets, edu/qos/qbone/info/bb-model. doc.
  • [11] Manzoor H., Yoshida M., “ENICOM'S Bandwidth Broker, SAINT2001”, San Diego, USA, Jan. 8-12, 2001, pp. 13-220.
  • [12] Zhang Z., Duan Z., Hou Y., “On Scalable Design of Bandwidth Brokers”, IEICE Trans. Communications, vol. E84-B, No. 8, August 2001, pp. 2011-2025.
  • [13] Bouras C., Stamos K., “Examining the Benefits of a Hybrid Distributed Architecture for Bandwidth Brokers”, Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference, 2005, IPCCC 2005 - 24th IEEE International, pp. 491-498.
  • [14] Bouras C., Stamos K., “An Adaptive Admission Control Algorithm for Bandwidth Brokers”, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA04), Cambridge, MA, USA, August 30 - September 1, 2004.
  • [15] Zhang Z. L., Duari Z., Gao L., Hou Y.T., “Decoupling QoS control from core routers: A novel bandwidth broker architecture for scalable support of guaranteed services”, Proc. ACM SIGCOMM, Stockholm, Sweden, August 2000, pp. 71-83.
  • [16] Kaczmarek S., Żmudziński P., „Metody Admission Control oparte na pomiarach”, IX Poznańskie Warsztaty Telekomunikacyjne, Poznań 2004, pp. 84-89.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BAT5-0010-0065
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.