A multicriteria approach to cooperation in the case of innovative activity

• Autorzy: Kruś L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper deals with ideas of multicriteria decision support with the use of computer based systems. A negotiation problem is considered related to joint realization of a risky innovative project by two parties. It is considered as a multicriteria bargaining problem. A procedure enabling interactive multicriteria analysis and derivation of mediation proposals is proposed. Some results of experimental calculations are included.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

multicriteria decision support; negotiations; innovations; financial analysis

PL

wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji; innowacyjność; analiza finansowa

• Wydawca: Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Control and Cybernetics
• Rocznik: 2004
• Tom: Vol. 33, no. 3
• Strony: 449--462
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Kruś L.

• Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Newelska 6, 01-447 Warsaw,

Bibliografia

• Coombs, C.H., Dawes, R.M. and Tversky, A. (1970) Mathematical Psychology: An Elementary Introduction. Prentice Hall, Englewood Inc., NJ.
• Ehtamo, H. and Hamalainen, R.P. (2001) Interactive multiple-criteria methods for reaching pareto optimal agreements in negotiations. Group Decision and Negotiation 10 (6), 475-491.
• Francis J. C. (1991) Investment Analysis and Management. McGraw Hill Inc., 5-th Edition.
• Kersten, G.E. (1988) A Procedure for Negotiating Efficient and Non–Efficient Compromises. Decision Support Systems 4, 167–177.
• Kulikowski, R. (2002) URS Methodology - a Tool for Stimulation of Economic Growth by Innovations. Bull. of Polish Academy of Sci., Ser. Techn. 50 (1).
• Kulikowski, R. (2003) On General Theory of Risk Management and Decision Support Systems. Bull. of Polish Academy of Sci., Ser. Techn. 51 (3).
• Kulikowski, R.(2004) Support of Natural, by Artificial, Intelligence Using Utility as Behavioral Goal. Proc. of the 7th ICAISC Conference.
• Kulikowski, R. and Kruś, L. (2003) Support of Education Decisions in Group Decisions and Voting. Ed. J.Kacprzyk and D.Wagner. AOW EXIT, Warszawa, 154-168.
• Kruś, L. and Bronisz, P. (1993) Some New Results in Interactive Approachto Multicriteria Bargaining. In: J. Wessels and A.P. Wierzbicki, eds.,User-Oriented Methodology and Techniques of Decision Analysis and Support, Springer Verlag.
• Kruś, L. (1996) Multicriteria Decision Support in Negotiations. Control and Cybernetics 25 (6), 1245-1260.
• Kruś, L. and Bronisz, P. (2000) Cooperative game solution concepts to acost allocation problem. EJOR 122 (2), 258-271.
• Kruś, L. (2002a) A System Supporting Financial Analysis of an Innovation Project in the Case of Two Negotiating Parties.Bull. of Polish Academy of Sci., Ser. Techn. 50 (1), 93-108.
• Kruś, L. (2002b) Multicriteria Decision Support in Bargaining, a Problemof Players Manipulations. In: T. Trzaskalik, J. Michnik, eds., Multiple Objective and Goal Programming, Physica Verlag, Springer.
• Kruś, L. (2003) Financial Analysis of Innovative Actvitiy. In: T. Trzaskalik, ed., Preference Modeling and Risk ’03, AE Katowice, Poland (in Polish).
• Lewandowski, A. (1989) SCDAS - Decision Support System for Group Decision Making: Theoretic Framework. Decision Support Systems 5, 403–423.
• Nash, J. (1950) The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica 18, 155-162.
• von Neuman, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1947) Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. Priceton Univ. Press, Princeton.
• Ogryczak, W. and Ruszczyński, A. (1999) From Stochastic Dominance to Mean-Risk Models: Semideviations as Risk Measures. EJOR 116, 33-50.
• Ogryczak, W. (2002) Multiple criteria optimization and decisions under risk. Control and Cybernetics 31 (4), 975-1004.
• Raiffa H. (1953) Arbitration schemes for generalized two-person games. Annals of Math. Studies 28, Princeton Univ. Press, 361-387.
• Sharpe, W., Alexander, G. and Bailey, J. (1995) Investments. 5th edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
• Tversky A. (1967) Utility theory and additivity analysis of risky choices. J.Experimental Psychology 75, 27-37.
• Vetschera, R.(1990) Group Decisions and Negotiation Support - a Methodological Survey. OR Spectrum 17, 67-77.
• Wierzbicki, A.P. (1986) On the Completeness and Constructiveness of Parametric Characterization to Vector Optimization Problems. OR-Spectrum 8, 73-87.
• Wierzbicki, A.P., Krus, L. and Makowski, M. (1993) The Role of Multi-Objective Optimization in Negotiation and Mediation Support. Theoryand Decision, special issue on ”International Negotiation Support Systems: Theory, Methods, and Practice” 34 (2).
• Wierzbicki A., Makowski M. and Wessels J. (2001) Model Based Decision Support Methodology with Environmental Applications. Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dodrecht-Boston-London.