Determination of conditions for derivatization and chromatographic analysis before simultaneous analysis of chloroveratroles and pentafluorobenzyl derivatives of chlorocatechols and chloroguaiacols in environmental and food samples

• Autorzy: Żołądź J. , Chrząszcz R. , Grochowalski A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and gas chromatography with electron-capture detection have been investigated for analysis of per-sistent chlorinated aromatic compounds in the aquatic environment. A ran-ge of polychlorinated veratroles, guaiacols, and catechols produced during pulp bleaching and during PCB degradation were derivatized with penta-fluorobenzyl bromide to improve their chromatographic properties. The reaction was conducted in the presence of triethylamine as neutralization reagent and the derivatized standards obtained were used to estimate the linear range, detection limits, and precision of the method. The conditions used for the derivatization reaction and for chromatographic analysis were optimized. Detector response for the derivatized guaiacols was a linear fun-ction of concentration in the range 0.5–100 ng mL-1; for chloroguaiacols and underivatized chloroveratroles the range was 0.5 to 80 ng mL-1. De-tection limits ranged from 0.18 ng mL-1 for tetrachlorocatechol (TeCC) to 2.72 ng mL-1 for 4-chloroguaiacol (4-CG). GC–MS was used for final con-firmation of the identity of the compounds analyzed.

• Wydawca: University of Silesia in Katowice ; Akademiai Kiado
• Czasopismo: Acta Chromatographica
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: No. 16
• Strony: 38--47
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 17 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Żołądź J.

autor

Chrząszcz R.

autor

Grochowalski A.

• Faculty of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] A.S. Allard, P.A. Hynning., M. Remberger, and A.H. Neilson, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 777 (1994)
• [2] A.S. Allard, P.A. Hynning, M. Remberger, A.H. Neilson, and L. Lander, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 774 (1983)
• [3] R. Cespes, A. Maturana, U. Bumann, M. Bronfman, and B. Gonzalez, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 46, 631 (1996)
• [4] M. Remberger, P.A Hynning, and A.H. Neilson, Environ. Sci Technol, 27, 158 (1993)
• [5] M. Remberger, A.S. Allard, and A.H. Neilson, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 552 (1986)
• [6] N. Schwiegert, S. Belkin, P. Leong-Morgenthaler, A.J.B. Zehnder, and R.I.L. Eggen, Environ. Mutagen., 33, 202 (1999)
• [7] A.S. Allard, P.A. Hynning, C. Lindgren, M. Remberger, and A.H. Neilson, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 77 (1991)
• [8] A.S. Allard, P.A. Hynning, C. Lindgren, M. Remberger, and A.H. Neilson, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2511 (1987)
• [9] T.J. Smith, R.H. Wearne, and A.F.A. Wallis, Chemosphere, 27, 1555 (1994)
• [10] L.P. Palekar, K.A. Maruaya, J.E. Kostka, and J. Wiegel, Chemosphere, 53, 593 (2003)
• [11] L. Hovander, T. Malmberg, M. Athanasiadou, I. Athanassiadis, S. Rahm, E. Bergman, and E. Klasson Wehler, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 42, 105 (2002)
• [12] A.H. Neilson, A.S. Allard, S. Fischer, M. Malmberg, and T. Viktor, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 20, 82 (1990)
• [13] K. Hosoya, N. Hira, Y. Watabe, N. Tanaka, T. Kubo, and K. Kaya, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 380, 343 (2004)
• [14] N. Kimura and Y. Urushigawa, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 92, 138 (2001)
• [15] L.E. Sojo and J. Djauhari, J. Chromatogr. A, 840, 21 (2001)
• [16] S. Kumar and C. Sharma, J. Environ. Monit., 1, 569 (1999)
• [17] L. Hovander, M. Athanasiadou, E. Asplund, S. Jensen, and E. Klasson Wehler, J. Anal. Toxicol., 24, 696 (2000)