The use and challenge of modal analysis in diagnostics

• Autorzy: Uhl T.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Analiza modalna w diagnostyce konstrukcji - za i przeciw

• Konferencja: Diagnostics'04, III Międzynarodowy Kongres Diagnostyki Technicznej (6-9 września 2004, Poznań, Polska)
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the paper applicability of modal analysis in diagnostics of structures is discussed. Methods of modal analysis which can be applied for operational diagnostics are presented and post-processing methods for diagnostic decision based on identified modal models are discussed. Several of presented methods are applied for diagnostics of laboratory structures, for validation and employed for real mechanical systems diagnostics.

PL

W pracy przedstawiono możliwości zastosowania eksperymentalnej analizy modalnej do diagnozowania konstrukcji mechanicznych. Przedyskutowano metody eksperymentalnej analizy modalnej, które mogą być stosowane dla celów diagnostyki eksploatacyjnej. Omówiono również metody wnioskowania diagnostycznego na podstawie zidentyfikowanych modeli modalnych konstrukcji. Przedstawiono przykłady zastosowania analizy modalnej do diagnostyki wybranych konstrukcji mechanicznych.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

model-based diagnostics; modal analysis; damage detection; damage localization

PL

diagnostyka na podstawie modelu; analiza modalna; detekcja uszkodzeń; lokalizacja uszkodzeń

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Diagnostyki Technicznej
• Czasopismo: Diagnostyka
• Rocznik: 2004
• Tom: Vol. 30, T. 2
• Strony: 151--160
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 42 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Uhl T.

• Katedra Robotyki I Dynamiki Maszyn, Akademia Górniczo - Hutnicza w Krakowie, Al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków,

Bibliografia

• [1] Natke, H.G. and Cempel, C., (1997) “ModelAided Diagnosis Based on Symptoms,” Structural Damage Assessment Using Advanced Signal Processing Procedures Proceedings of DAMAS ‘97, Univ. of Sheffield, UK, pp. 363-375.
• [2] Uhl T., Komputerowe wspomaganie identyfikacji modeli konstrukcji,, WNT, Warszawa, 1997.
• [3] Uhl T., Petko, M.: Smart sensor for operational load measurements. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 40, 3, 2002, str.. 797-815.
• [4] Uhl T., Lisowski W., In-operation modal analysis, Wydawnictwo KRiDM AGH, Kraków, 2001.
• [5] Uhl T., Kurowski P., Pieczara J, Iwaniec J., Improvement of damping estimators in modal analysis, Proc of ISMA2004, Leuven (will be printed).
• [6] C.R. Farrar, W.E Becker, T.M. Bell, Dynamic characterization of damage detection in the I-40 bridge over the Rio Grande, LA12767-MS, Los Alamaos National Lab. Report, 1994.
• [7] R. Brincker, L. Zhang, P. Andersen, Modal Identification from Ambient Responses using Frequency Domain Decomposition, Proc. of 18th IMAC, SEM USA, pp.625-630 (2000).
• [8] L. Hermans, H. Van der Auweraer, Modal Testing and Analysis of Structures under Operational Conditions: Industrial Applications, Mechanical Systems & Signal Processing, Vol.13, No.2, pp.193-216 (, 1999).
• [9] Uhl T., Bogacz M. Real-time modal analysis and its application for structure diagnostics, SYSID, 2003, Amsterdam.
• [10] Zak, A., M. Krawczuk and W. Ostachowicz (1999) “Vibration of a Laminated CompositePlate with Closing Delamination,” Structural Damage Assessment Using Advanced Signal Processing Procedures Proceedings of DAMAS ‘99, Univ. College, Dublin, Ireland, pp.17-26.
• [11] Williams, E.J. and Messina, A., (1999) “Applications of the Multiple Damage Location Assurance Criterion,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Damage Assessment of Structures (DAMAS 99), Dublin, Ireland, 256-264.
• [12] Ettouney, M., Daddazio, R., Hapij, A., and Aly, A., (1998), “Health Monitoring of Complex Structures,” Smart Structures and Materials 1999: Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 3326, pp. 368-379.
• [13] Kawiecki, G., (2000) “Modal Damping Measurements for Damage Detection,” European COST F3 Conference on System Identification and Structural Health Monitoring, Madrid, Spain, 651-658.
• [14] Agneni A., Crema, L., and Mastroddi F., (2000) “Damage Detection from Truncated Frequency Response Functions,” European COST F3 Conference on System Identification and Structural Health Monitoring, Madrid, Spain, 137-146.
• [15] Lopes, V. Jr., Pereira, J.A., and Inman, D.J., (2000), “Structural FRF Acquisition via Electric Impedance Measurement Applied to Damage Location,” Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 4062, 1549-1555.
• [16] Balis Crema, L. and Mastroddi, F., (1998) “A Direct Approach for Updating and Damage Detection by Using FRF Data,” Proceedings of ISMA23, Noise and Vibration Engineering, Leuven, Belgium.
• [17] Maeck, J., Abdel Wahab, M., and De Roeck, G., (1998) “Damage Detection in Reinforced Concrete Structures by Dynamic System Identification,” Proceedings of ISMA23, Noise and Vibration Engineering, Leuven, Belgium.
• [18] Ho, Y.K. and Ewins, D.J., (1999) “Numerical Evaluation of the Damage Index,” Structural Health Monitoring 2000, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 995-1011.
• [19] Wang, M. L., Xu, F. L., and Lloyd, G. M., (2000) “A Systematic Numerical Analysis of the Damage Index Method Used for Bridge Diagnostics” Smart Structures and Materials 2000: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 3988, Newport Beach, CA, pp. 154-164.
• [20] Carrasco, C., Osegueda, R., Ferregut, C., and Grygier, M., (1997), “Localization and Quantification of Damage in a Space Truss Model Using Modal Strain Energy,” Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 3043, pp. 181-192.
• [21] Sohn, H. and Law, K.H., (1999) “Extraction of Ritz Vectors from Vibration Test Data,” Structural Health Monitoring 2000, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 840-850.
• [22] Heyns, P.S., (1997) “Structural Damage Assessment Using Response-Only Meaurements,” Structural Damage Assessment Using Advanced Signal Processing Procedures Proceedings of DAMAS ‘97, Univ. of Sheffield, UK, pp. 213-223.
• [23] Bodeux, J.B. and Golinval, J.C., (2000) “ARMAV Model Technique for System Identification and Damage Detection,” European COST F3 Conference on System Identification and Structural Health Monitoring, Madrid, Spain, 303-312.
• [24] Gaul, L. and Hurlebaus, S., (2000) “WaveletTransform to Identify the Location and ForceTime-History of Transient Load in a Plate,” Structural Health Monitoring 2000, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, pp.851-860.
• [25] Naldi, G. and Venini, P., (1997) “Postprocessing Singular Solutions by the Wavelet Transform,” Structural Damage Assessment Using Advanced Signal Processing Procedures Proceedings of DAMAS ‘97, Univ. of Sheffield, UK, pp. 109-120.
• [26] Ruotolo, R. and C. Surace (1997b) “Damage Detection Using Singular Value Decomposition,” Structural Damage Assessment Using Advanced Signal Processing Procedures Proceedings of DAMAS ‘97, Univ. of Sheffield, UK, pp. 87-96.
• [27] Zimmerman, D.C., (1999), Looking into the Crystal Ball: The Continued Need for Multiple Viewpoints in Damage Detection, Damage Assessment of Structures, Proceedings of the International Conference on Damage Assessment of Structures (DAMAS 99), Dublin, Ireland, 76-90.
• [28] Fritzen C.P., Bohle K., Parameter selection strategies in model-based damage detection, SHM2000, Palo Alto, CA, 2000.
• [29] Ruotolo R., Sorohan S., Surace C., Analysis of the behavior of three-dimensional truss structure, European COST F3 Conference on System Identification and Structural Health Monitoring, Madrid, Spain, pp.169-178.
• [30] Rytter A., Kirkegaard P., Vibration based inspection using NN, Proceedings of DAMAS ‘97, Univ. of Sheffield, UK, pp. 97-108.
• [31] Modena,, C., Sonda, D., and Zonta, D., (1999), “Damage Localization in Reinforced Concrete Structures by Using Damping Measurements,” Damage Assessment of Structures, Proceedings of the International Conference on Damage Assessment of Structures (DAMAS 99), Dublin, Ireland, 132-141.
• [32] Zonta, D., Modena, C., and Bursi, O.S., (2000) “Analysis of Dispersive Phenomena in Damaged Structures,” European COST F3 Conference on System Identification and Structural Health Monitoring, Madrid, Spain, 801-810.
• [33] Hanselka H., Mechler M., Campanile L.F., Kaiser S., A demonstrator for on-line health monitoring of adaptive structures, Proceedings of DAMAS ‘97, Univ. of Sheffield, UK pp.225-236.
• [34] Kim, J., Ryu, Y., Lee, B., and Stubbs, N., (1997), “Smart Baseline Model for Nondestructive Evaluation of Highway Bridges,” Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures and Highways, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol., pp. 217-226.
• [35] Choi, S., and Stubbs, N., (1997), “Nondestructive Damage Detection Algorithms for 2D Plates,” Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol.3043, pp. 193-204.
• [36] Topole, K., (1997), “Damage Evaluation via Flexibility Formulation,” Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 3043, pp. 145-154.
• [37] Reich, G. W. and Park, K.C., (2000) “Experimental Applications of a Structural Health Monitoring Methodology” Smart Structures and Materials 2000: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 3988, Newport Beach, CA,pp. 143-153.
• [38] Staszewski, W.J., Biemans, C., Boller, C., and Tomlinson, G.R., (1999) “Impact Damage Detection in Composite Structures-Recent Advances,” Structural Health Monitoring 2000, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, pp. 754-763.
• [39] Klepka A., Uhl T.(2003), An application of the wavelet analysis for identification of a damping coefficient, ZEM, vol,38, no.3, 2003, pp. 19-37.
• [40] Garcia, G., Osegueda, R., and Meza, D., (1998), “Comparison of the Damage Detection Results Utilizing an ARMA Model and a FRF Model to Extract the Modal Parameters, ”Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, Proceedings of SPIE, Vol. 3325, pp. 244-252.
• [41] Zhang, L., Quiong, W., and Link, M., (1998) “A Structural Damage Identification Approach Based on Element Modal Strain Energy,” Proceedings of ISMA23, Noise and Vibration Engineering, Leuven, Belgium.
• [42] Worden, K., Manson, G., Wardle, R., Staszewski, W., and Allman, D., (1999) “Experimental Validation of Two Structural Health Monitoring Methods,” Structural Health Monitoring 2000, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, 784-799.