Effect of particle-size distribution and particle porosity changes on mass-transfer kinetics

• Autorzy: Kaczmarski K. , Bellor J. Ch.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Effective mass-transfer kinetics depend on particle-size distribution (PSD) and particle porosity (among other complex phenomena). The pore-diffusion flux can vary with adsorbate loading - if the amount of adsorbed species is sufficiently large it can lead to hindrance effects that substantially change particle porosity. By use of batch kinetic adsorption experiments the general rate model was used to investigate the effect of PSD and variation of particle porosity on the pore-diffusivity coefficient, Dp. It was proved that neglec-ting these phenomena can lead to misinterpretation of experimental data. Modelling of HPLC profiles using PSD and conventional modelling with mean diameters was also examined and compared.

• Wydawca: University of Silesia in Katowice ; Akademiai Kiado
• Czasopismo: Acta Chromatographica
• Rocznik: 2003
• Tom: No. 13
• Strony: 22--37
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 22 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kaczmarski K.

• Faculty of Chemistry, Rzeszów University of Technology, ul. W. Pola 2, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Bellor J. Ch.

• Centre de Bioingéniere Gilbert Durand, UMR-CNRS 5504, UMR-INRA 792, INSA, 135 av. de Rangueil, 31077 Toulouse, Cedex 4, France

Bibliografia

• [1] D.M. Ruthven, Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Process, Wiley, New York, NY, 1984
• [2] M. Suzuki, Adsorption Engineering, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1990
• [3] A.J. Berninger, R.D. Whitley, X. Zhang, and N.-H.L. Wang, Comput. Chem. Eng., 15, 749 (1991)
• [4] G. Guiochon, S. Golshan – Shirazi, and A.M. Katti, Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography, Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1994
• [5] K. Kaczmarski, D. Antos, H. Sajonz, P. Sajonz, and G. Guiochon, J. Chromatogr. A, 925, 1 (2001)
• [6] G.L. Skidmore, B.J. Horstmann, and H.A. Chase, J. Chromatogr., 498, 113 (1990)
• [7] B.J. Horstmann and H.A. Chase, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 67, 243 (1989)
• [8] A. Cavazzini, K. Kaczmarski, P. Szabelski, D. Zhou, X. Liu, and G. Guiochon, Anal. Chem., 73, 5704 (2001)
• [9] A.K. Hunter and G. Carta, J. Chromatogr. A, 897, 81 (2000)
• [10] W.-D. Chen, X.-Y. Dong, and Y. Sun, J. Chromatogr. A, 962, 29 (2002)
• [11] R. Hughes, Deactivation of Catalysts, Academic Press, New York, 1984
• [12] H.S. Fogler, Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1999
• [13] I.A. Liapis, J.J. Meyers, and O.K. Crosser, J. Chromatogr. A, 865, 13 (1999)
• [14] F. Gritti, W. Piątkowski, and G. Guiochon, J. Chromatogr. A, 983, 51 (2003)
• [15] W. Piątkowski, F. Gritti, K. Kaczmarski, and G. Guiochon, J. Chromatogr. A, in press
• [16] V.J. Villadsen and M.L. Michelsen, Solution of Differential Equation Model by Polynomial Approximation, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1978
• [17] P.N. Brown, A.C. Hindmarsh, and G.D. Byrne, Variable Coefficient Ordinary Differential Equation Solver, procedure available on http://www.netlib.org
• [18] U.D. Neue, HPLC Columns. Theory, Technology, and Practice, Wiley–VCH, 1997
• [19] J. Thommes, Fluidized Bed Adsorption as a Primary Recovery Step in Protein Purification, Advances in Biochemical Engineering, Biotechnology, Vol. 58, Springer, 1997
• [20] H.G. Brittain, Pharm. Technol., 25, 96 (2001)
• [21] I. Theodossiou, H. D. Elsner, O.R.T. Thomas, and T.J. Hobley, J. Chromatogr. A, 964, 77 (2002)
• [22] M.T. Tyn and T.W. Gusek, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 35, 327 (1990)