Speech intelligibility in various spatial configurations of background noise

• Autorzy: Kociński J. , Sęk A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study is concerned with the influence of spatial separation of disturbing sources of noise on the speech intelligibility. Spatial separation of speech and disturbing sources without changing their acoustic power may contribute to the significant improvement in the speech intelligibility. This problem has been recently analysed in many papers [1-5]. These works have confirmed an important role of the spatial configuration of sources. However, there have been no work investigating this problem for nonsense words (logatoms) that may provide more rigorous tests of this phenomenon. Moreover, this problem has not been analysed for Polish speech. It is important to emphasize that the acoustic and phonetic properties of Polish speech are somewhat different from those of English one. Therefore, the attempt to investigate the influence of the spatial separation of sound sources was made in this study. In the situation with more than one spatially separated disturbances, there may occur a so-called spatial suppression phenomenon, that is "mutual suppression'' of disturbing sounds in the auditory system that brings about an increase in the speech intelligibility. This phenomenon is also called the spatial unmasking of speech [5, 6]. The research consist in determination of the speech intelligibility in the presence of one or two statistically independent speech-shaped noise sources varying in configuration. Only two pairs of the spatial configurations were investigated. Character of the dependences obtained in the study implies that the spatial suppression occurs in certain configurations of sources only. This effect brings about an increase in the speech intelligibility and can be explained on the basis of the binaural masking level difference (BMLD). It seems then that the BMLD may be a more general phenomenon and includes not only difference in the detection threshold of a pure tone masked by noise but also the improvement in the speech intelligibility, while speech is presented at the background of disturbing signals.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

speech intelligibility; speech perception; spatial separation; spatial suppression

• Wydawca: Instytut Podstawowych Problemów Techniki PAN ; Komitet Akustyki PAN ; Polskie Towarzystwo Akustyczne
• Czasopismo: Archives of Acoustics
• Rocznik: 2005
• Tom: Vol. 30, No. 2
• Strony: 173--191
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Kociński J.

• Adam Mickiewicz University, Institute of Acoustics, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznań, Poland

autor

Sęk A.

• Adam Mickiewicz University, Institute of Acoustics, Umultowska 85, 61-614 Poznań, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] BRONKHURST A.W., PLOMP R., The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 4, 1508–1516 (1988).
• [2] PEISSIG J., KOLLMEIER J., Directivity of binaural noise reduction in spatial multiple noise-source arrangements for normal and impaired listeners, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101, 1660–1670 (1997).
• [3] HAWLEY M. L., LITOVSKY R. Y., COLBURN H. S., Speech intelligibility and localization in a multisource environment, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 3436–3448 (1999).
• [4] SHINN-CUNNINGHAM B. G. KOPČO N., Tori of confusion: Binaural localization cues for sources within reach of a listener, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1627–1636 (2000).
• [5] SHINN-CUNINGHAM, B. B., SCHICKLER J., KOPČO N., LITOVSKY R., Spatial unmasking of nearby speech sources in a simulated anechoic environment, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 1118–1129 (2001).
• [6] FREYMAN R. L., BALAKRISHNAN U., HELFER K. S., Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109 (5 Pt 1) 2112–2122 (2001).
• [7] LICKLIDER J. C. R., The influence of interaural phase relations upon the masking of speech by white noise, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 20, 150–159 (1948).
• [8] DRIKS D. D., WILSON R. H., The effect of spatially separated sound sources on speech intelligibility, J. Speech Hear. Res., 12 (5–38) (1969).
• [9] PLOMP R., MIMPEN A. M., Effect of the orientation of the speaker’s head and the azimuth of a noise source on the speech reception thresholds for sentences, Acoustica, 48, 325–328 (1981).
• [10] ZWICKER E., FASTL H., Psychoacoustics – facts and models, second edition, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1999.
• [11] HIRSH I. J., The relation between localization and intelligibility, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 196–200 (1950).
• [12] BRONKHORST A.W., PLOMP R., The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 4, 1508–1516 (1988).
• [13] HAWLEY M. L., LITOVSKY R. Y., CULLING J. F., The benefit of binaural hearing in a coctail party: Effect of location and type of interferer, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 2, 833–843 (2004).
• [14] BAER T., MOORE B. C. J., GATEHOUSE S., Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality and response times, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 30, 49–72 (1993).
• [15] BOCCA E., C. CALEARO, General hearing processes, [in:] Modern developments in Audiology, J. J., Editor. 648–662, Academic Press, New York 1963.
• [16] BRACHMAŃSKI S., STARONIEWICZ P., Phonetic structure of test material used in subjective measurement of speech quality [in Polish], [in:] Speech and Language Technology, 71–80, Poznań 1999.
• [17] MOORE B. C. J., An introduction to the psychology of hearing, 5-th Ed. Academic Press, London 2003.
• [18] DURLACH N. I., GABRIEL K. J., COLBURN H. S., TRAHIOTIS C., Interaural correlation discrimination: II. Relation to binaural unmasking, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79, 1548–1557 (1986).
• [19] CHERRY E. C., Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979 (1953).
• [20] POLLACK I., PICKETT J. M., Stereophonic listening and speech intelligibility against voice babbles, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 131–133 (1958).
• [21] JASSEM W., Noise spectra of fricative consonants, IV International Congress on Acoustics: Copenhagen 1962.
• [22] JASSEM W., The formants of fricative consonants, LS, 8, 1, 1–16 (1965).
• [23] PRUSZEWICZ A., SURMANOWICZ–DEMENKO G., WIKA T., RICHTER L., Polish numerical and word test for hearing examination and tests for hearing training [in Polish], Marke-Med, Poznań 1999.
• [24] DUQUESNOY A. J., PLOMP R., The effect of a hearing-aid on the speech-reception threshold of hearing-impaired listeners in quiet and in noise, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 2166–2173, 1983.
• [25] CULLING J. F., COLBURN H. S., Binaural sluggishness in the perception of tone sequences and speech in noise, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 1, 517–527 (2000).
• [26] SĘK A., SKRODZKA E., OZIMEK E., WICHER A., Intelligibility of speech processed by a spectral contrast enhancement procedure and a binaural procedure, Archives of Acoustics, 29, 1, 25–34 (2004).