Implementing Lean - discussing standardization versus customization with focus on national cultural dimensions

• Autorzy: Abrahamsson S. , Isaksson R.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Lean or Toyota Production System (TPS) has more or less successfully been implemented in the Western world's businesses and organizations for the past 20 years. Several authors have discussed what it is that creates a successful implementation, and several studies have been presented where strategies for implementations have been studied. Culture's impact and possible mitigation for Western companies have been studied and described by for example Womak & Jones. Proponents of the concept of Lean argue that culture is not a constraint for implementation of Lean. Lean Management is called a philosophy but it is often used as a change strategy in the sense that it is implemented with the view of improving performance. A change strategy could be seen as a product that might have to be customized with the view of improving the effectiveness of the implementation. On the other hand abandoning a standardized approach comes with the risk of severely altering the change strategy, possibly to its detriment. Implementing Lean will have an effect on the company culture. Does it make any sense customizing the implementation to culture if the issue is changing the culture? The purpose of this paper is to highlight and discuss the balance between a customized implementation and a standardized implementation. Which are the main arguments for standardization and customization and how could these be reconciled? A literature study of Lean implementation has been carried out and compared with Lean principles and theories from change management with focus on change drivers and change barriers. Main drivers of Hofstede's national cultural dimensions are compared with Lean principles to identify possible drivers and barriers in different cultures. The theory synthesis on drivers and barriers is subjected to a first test in a case study on Lean implementation according to a standardized approach. The implementation is made in a small Swedish factory belonging to a worldwide industrial company. Results from the literature review and the case study indicate that both customization and standardization are needed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Lean; Lean implementation; change management; customization; cultural dimensions

• Wydawca: Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Polish Association for Production Management
• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 3, No. 4
• Strony: 4--13
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 16 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Abrahamsson S.

autor

Isaksson R.

• Gotland University, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, 621 67 Visby, Sweden, phone: [phone],

Bibliografia

• [1] Womack J.P., Jones D.T., Lean Thinking Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation, Simon Schuster UK Ltd, 2003.
• [2] Liker Jeffrey K., The Toyota Way, McGraw-Hill: USA, 2004.
• [3] Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, McGraw-Hill: USA, 2005.
• [4] Åhlström P., Sequence in the Implementation of Lean Production, in European Management Journal, 16, 3, 327-334, 1998.
• [5] Poksinska B., The Current State of Lean Implementation in Health Care: Literature Review, in Quality Management in Health Care, 19, 4, 319-329, 2010.
• [6] Roos L.-U., Japanisation in Production Systems: Some Case Studies of Total Quality Management in British Manufacturing Industry. Japanisering inom produktionssystem: Några fallstudier av Total Quality Management i brittisk tillverkningsindustri, Business School of Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, 1990.
• [7] Hines P., Found P., Griffiths G., Harrison R., Staying lean: thriving, not just surviving, Lean Enterprise Research Centre, Cardiff, 2008.
• [8] Hallencreutz J., Turner D-M., Exploring Organizational Change Best Practice - are there any clear cut models and definitions?, in International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 3, 1, 60-68, 2011.
• [9] Kotter J.P., Leading Change, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 1996.
• [10] Kotter J.P., The Sense of Urgency, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, 2008.
• [11] Abrahamsson S., Isaksson R., Adding requirements on customers to current quality models to improve quality - development of a customer - vendor interaction, Proceedings of the International Conferencequality and service sciences, 13th QMOD Conference, August 31 - September 1, Cottbus, Germany, 2010.
• [12] Schein E.H., Organization Culture and Leadership, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publischers, 1992.
• [13] Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Retrieved 20.11.2012 from http://www.geerthofstede.nl/research-vsm/dimension-data-matrix.aspx.
• [14] Emiliani M L., Origins of Lean management in America, in Journal of management History, 12, 2, 167-184, 2006.
• [15] Spear S.J., Learning to Lead at Toyota, in Harvard Business review, 82, 5, 78-86, May 2004.
• [16] Ljungblom M., A comparative study between Developmental leadership and Lean leadership - similarities and differences, Management and Production Engineering Review, in press.