Zachowanie drewnianych domów wiejskich i ich otoczenia metodą pozostawienia in situ na obszarze Jury Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej

• Autorzy: Bach A. , Uruszczak M.

Warianty tytułu

EN

The preservation of the wooden cottages and their surroundings in the area of Jura Krakowsko-Częstochowska using the method of leaving in situ

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

Scientists have been researching the problem of how to protect wooden buildings for a long time. Wood, which is a non-durable material is also the symbol of traditional, folk architecture in Poland. In general, the technical condition of the buildings in the area of Jura Krakowsko-Częstochowska is not good. There are many reasons for that. Some of them are considered by F. Midura in his article The protection of folk architecture in the period of PRL. He says, that many wooden houses have been ruined because of the lack of qualified artisans who have knowledge of traditional building methods, and also because of legislation negligence or out of law situation [Midura 1989]. The researchers point out, that the main reason for the bad condition of historical folk architecture is lack of social consciousness, lack of relations with tradition, underestimation of the role of cultural heritage in social and economic life, and also a break-down with a general sense of aesthetics in rural societies. The salvation for the still existing wooden buildings is to adapt them to the new function that they could fulfill. Janusz Bogdanowski in his work Polish decorative gardens considers this problem in the aspect of regionalism. The matter consists of obtaining and adapting the old regional houses as recreation places (as second houses). That way, they can be rescued [Bogdanowski, 2000]. This adaptation should be done with respect to all conservation regulations. It should be followed by wellrounded research of regional forms of architecture, and also by detailed analysis of the preserved building. In this article there are presented various ways of preservation of wooden houses using the method of leaving in situ in the area of Jura Krakowsko-Częstochowska. The first one is to leave an intact building and its surroundings. The example is the cottage in Sadowie. The outside and inside design has not been changed since the 19th century, when it was built. The second one is an adaptation of the building to its new function with some little changes in its outside appearance. The examples are two houses in Czatachowa and Czernichów. The last method is the process of revaluation of a house by its extension and using regional materials. The example is a house in Siedlec near Krakow.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

wiejski dom drewniany; ochrona budynków; metoda pozostawienia in situ; Jura Krakowsko-Częstochowska

EN

wooden cottage; preservation; method of leaving in situ; Jura Krakowsko-Częstochowska

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Przyrodniczego we Wrocławiu
• Czasopismo: Architektura Krajobrazu
• Rocznik: 2005
• Tom: nr 3-4
• Strony: 45--48
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 8 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Bach A.

• Akademia Rolnicza w Krakowie

autor

Uruszczak M.

• Akademia Rolnicza w Krakowie

Bibliografia

• 1. Bogdanowski J., 2000, Polskie ogrody ozdobne, wyd. „Arkady”, Kraków, s. 296.
• 2. Bogdanowski J., 1993, Sztuka obronna [w:] Natura i kultura w krajobrazie Jury, wyd. ZZJPK, Kraków, s. 96.
• 3. Bogdanowski J., 1990, Architektura ludowa [w:] Jurajskie parki krajobrazowe województwa krakowskiego, wyd. Karpaty, Kraków, s. 30-31.
• 5. Czajkowski J., 1980, Informacje o muzeach na wolnym powietrzu w Polsce [w:] Acta Scansenologica, nr I, wyd. Museum Budownictwa Ludowego w Sanoku, Sanok, s. 179-210.
• 6. Mełges M., 2002, Przemiany domu wiejskiego na przykładzie stref ochronnych Jury Krakowko-Częstochowskiej w kontekście zachowania i chronienia regionalnych form budownictwa i krajobrazu kulturowego [w:] Wieś polska - współczesne przemiany i rozwój, wyd. Polski Klub Ekologiczny, Kraków, s. 92-97.
• 7. Midura F., 1989, Ochrona budownictwa ludowego w okresie PRL [w:] Acta Scansenologica, nr V, wyd. Muzeum Budownictwa Ludowego w Sanoku, Sanok, s. 126-128.
• 8. Uruszczak M., Bach A., 2004, Tradycja a współczesny krajobraz wsi polskiej w obrębie Jury Krakowsko-Częstochowskiej [w:] Krajobraz i ogród wiejski, t. II, „Tradycja a wpółczesny krajobraz wsi polskiej”, wyd. KUL, Lublin, s. 185-187.
• 9. Wysocki J., 2003, Architektura wiejska w cieniu tandetnej nowoczesności [w:] Zachowane - Ocalone? O krajobrazie kulturowym i sposobach jego kształtowania, wyd. Stowarzyszenie WK „Borussia”, Olsztyn, s. 66-74.