Coordinating contracts in SCM: a review of methods and literature

• Autorzy: Hezarkhani B. , Kubiak W.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Supply chain coordination through contracts has been a burgeoning area of research in recent years. In spite of rapid development of research, there are only a few structured analyses of assumptions, methods, and applicability of insights in this field. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic overview of coordinating contracts in supply chain through highlighting the main concepts, assumptions, methods, and present the state-of-theart research in this field.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

supply chain management; coordination; methodology

• Wydawca: AGH University of Science and Technology Press
• Czasopismo: Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services
• Rocznik: 2010
• Tom: Vol. 4, no. 1-2
• Strony: 5--28
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. [108] poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Hezarkhani B.

• PhD Candidate,

autor

Kubiak W.

• Faculty of Business Administration, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL, Canada, A1B 3X5

Bibliografia

• Anupindi, R., Bassok, Y., and Zemel, E., 2001. A general framework for the study of decentralized distribution systems. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 3(4):349–368.
• Aumann, R. J., 2000. Collected papers: Volume 2, chapter A survey of cooperative games without side payments, pages 31–56. MIT Press.
• Baiou, M. and Balinski, M., 2002. Erratum: The stable allocation (or ordinal transportation) problem. Mathematics of Operations Research, 27(4):662–680.
• Barnes-Schuster, D., Bassok, Y., and Anupindi, R., 2002. Coordination and flexibility in supply contracts with options. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 4(3):171–207.
• Benzion, U., Cohen, Y., Peled, R., and Shavit, T., 2008. Decision-making and the newsvendor problem: an experimental study. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(9):1281–1287.
• Bernstein, F. and Federgruen, A., 2005. Decentralized supply chains with competing retailers under demand uncertainty. Management Science, 51(1):18–29.
• Bolton, G. E. and Katok, E., 2008. Learning by Doing in the Newsvendor Problem: A Laboratory Investigation of the Role of Experience and Feedback. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(3):519–538.
• Brandenburger, A. and Stuart, H., 2007. Biform games. Management Science, 53(4):537–549.
• Brousseau, E. and Glachant, J. M., 2002. The economics of contracts: theories and applications. Cambridge University Press.
• Burnetas, A., Gilbert, S. M., and Smith, C. E., 2007. Quantity discounts in single-period supply contracts with asymmetric demand information. IIE Transactions, 39(5):465– 479.
• Cachon, G. P., 1999. Quantitative models for supply chain management, chapter Competitive supply chain inventory management, pages 111–146. Kluwer.
• Cachon, G. P., 2003. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply chain management, chapter Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts. North-Holland.
• Cachon, G. P., 2004. The allocation of inventory risk in a supply chain: Push, pull, and advance-purchase discount contracts. Management Science, 50(2):222–238.
• Cachon, G. P. and Kok, A. G., 2010. Competing Manufacturers in a Retail Supply Chain: On Contractual Form and Coordination. Management Science, 56(3):571–589.
• Cachon, G. P. and Lariviere, M. A., 1999. Capacity choice and allocation: strategic behavior and supply chain performance. Management Science, 45(8):1091–1108.
• Cachon, G. P. and Lariviere, M. A., 2001. Contracting to assure supply: How to share demand forecasts in a supply chain. Management Science, 47(5):629–646.
• Cachon, G. P. and Lariviere, M. A., 2005. Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations. Management Science, 51(1):30–44.
• Cachon, G. P. and Netessine, S., 2004. Supply Chain Analysis in the eBusiness Era, chapter Game theory in supply chain analysis. Kluwer.
• Cachon, G. P. and Netessine, S., 2006. Tutorials in Operations Research, chapter Game theory in supply chain analysis, pages 200–233. INFORMS.
• Cachon, G. P. and Zipkin, P. H., 1999. Competitive and cooperative inventory policies in a two-stage supply chain. Management science, 45(7):936–953.
• Caldentey, R. and Wein, L. M., 2003. Analysis of a decentralized production-inventory system. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 5(1):1–17.
• Chakravarty, A. K. and Zhang, J., 2007. Lateral capacity exchange and its impact on capacity investment decisions. Naval Research Logistics, 54(6):632–644
• Chan, L. M. A., Shen, Z. J. M., Simchi-Levi, D., and Swann, J. L., 2004. Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis: Modeling in the E-Business Era, chapter Coordination of pricing and inventory decisions: A survey and classification, pages 335–392. Kluwer.
• Chen, F., 1999. Decentralized supply chains subject to information delays. Management Science, 45(8):1076–1090.
• Chen, F. and Parlar, M., 2007. Value of a put option to the risk-averse newsvendor. IIE Transactions, 39(5):481–500.
• Chen, X., Li, C., Rhee, B., and Simchi-Levi, D., 2007. The impact of manufacturer rebates on supply chain profits. Naval Research Logistics, 54(6):667–680.
• Chen, X. and Zhang, J., 2009. A stochastic programming duality approach to inventory centralization games. Operations Research, 57(4):840–851.
• Chinchuluun, A., Karakitsiou, A., and Mavrommati, A., 2008. Pareto optimality, game theory and equilibria, chapter Game theory models and their applications in inventory management and supply chain, pages 833–865. Springer.
• Choi, T. M., Li, D., Yan, H., and Chiu, C. H., 2008. Channel coordination in supply chains with agents having mean-variance objectives. Omega, 36(4):565–576.
• Clark, A. J. and Scarf, H., 1960. Optimal policies for a multi-echelon inventory problem. Management science, 50(12):475–490.
• Corbett, C. J. and Tang, C. S., 1999. Quantitative models for supply chain management, chapter Designing supply contracts: contract type and information symmetry, pages 269–297. Kluwer.
• Corbett, C. J., Zhou, D., and Tang, C. S., 2004. Designing supply contracts: Contract type and information asymmetry. Management Science, 50(4):550–559.
• Cui, T. H., Raju, J. S., and Zhang, Z. J., 2007. Fairness and channel coordination. Management Science, 53(8):1303–1314.
• Debo, L. G., Savaskan, R. C., and Van Wassenhove, L. N., 2004. Reverse Logistics, Quantitative Models for Closed Loop Supply Chains, chapter Coordination in closed-loop supply chains, pages 295–311. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
• Deneckere, R., Marvel, H., and Peck, J., 1997. Demand uncertainty and price maintenance: amrkdowns as destructive competition. American Economic Review, 87(4):619–41.
• Ding, D. and Chen, J., 2008. Coordinating a three level supply chain with flexible return policies. Omega, 36(5):865–876.
• Dolan, R. J., 1987. Quantity discounts: managerial issues and research opportunities. Marketing Science, 6(1):1–22.
• Donohue, K. L., 2000. Efficient supply contracts for fashion goods with forecast updating and two production modes. Management Science, 46(11):1397–1411.
• Gan, X., Sethi, S. P., and Yan, H., 2004. Coordination of supply chains with risk-averse agents. Production and Operations Management, 13(2):135–149.
• Gan, X., Sethi, S. P., and Yan, H., 2005. Channel coordination with a risk-neutral supplier and a downside-risk-averse retailer. Production & Operations Management, 14(1):80–89.
• Gomez-Padilla, A., Duvallet, J., and Daniel Llerena, D., 2005. Research methodologies in supply chain management, chapter Contract typology as a research method in supply chain management, pages 525–538. Physica-Verlag HD.
• Ha, A. and Tong, S., 2008. Revenue sharing contracts in a supply chain with uncontractible actions. Naval Research Logistics, 55(5):419–431.
• Hanany, E., Tzur, M., and Levran, A., 2010. The transshipment fund mechanism: Coordinating the decentralized multilocation transshipment problem. Naval Research Logistics, 57(4):342–353.
• Harsanyi, J. and Selten, R., 1972. A generalized Nash solution for two-person bargaining games with incomplete information. Management Science, 18(5):80–106.
• Hartman, B. C. and Dror, M., 2005. Allocation of gains from inventory centralization in newsvendor environments. IIE Transactions, 37(2):93–107.
• He, Y. and Zhang, J., 2008. Random yield risk sharing in a two-level supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 112(2):769–781.
• He, Y., Zhao, X., Zhao, L., and He, J., 2009. Coordinating a supply chain with effort and price dependent stochastic demand. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(6):2777–2790.
• Hezarkhani, B. and Kubiak, W., 2010a. A coordinating contract for transshipment in a twocompany supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(1):232–237.
• Hezarkhani, B. and Kubiak, W., 2010b. Transshipment prices and pair-wise stability in coordinating the decentralized transshipment problem. In BQGT ’10: Proceedings of the Behavioral and Quantitative Game Theory, pages 1–6.
• Hu, X., Duenyas, I., and Kapuscinski, R., 2007. Existence of coordinating transshipment prices in a two-location inventory model. Management Science, 53(8):1289–1302.
• Ingene, C. A. and Parry, M. E., 2004. Mathematical Models of Distribution Channels. Springer US.
• Jeuland, A. P. and Shugan, S. M., 1983. Managing channel profits. Marketing Science, 2(3):239–272.
• Katok, E. and Wu, D., 2009. Contracting in supply chains: A laboratory investigation. Management Science, 55(12):1953–1968.
• Khouja, M., 1999. The single-period, news-vendor) problem: literature review and suggestions for future research. Omega, 27(5):537–553.
• Klastorin, T. D., Moinzadeh, K., and Son, J., 2002. Coordinating orders in supply chains through price discounts. IIE Transactions, 34(8):679–689.
• Krishnan, H. and Winter, R., 2010. Inventory dynamics and supply chain coordination. Management Science, 56(1):141–147.
• Lariviere, M. A. and Porteus, E. L., 2001. Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 3(4):293–305.
• Lee, H. and Whang, S., 1999. Decentralized multi-echelon supply chains: Incentives and information. Management Science, 45(5):633–640.
• Leng, M. and Zhu, A., 2009. Side-payment contracts in two-person nonzero-sum supply chain games: Review, discussion and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2):600–618.
• Li, X. and Wang, Q., 2007. Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 179(1):1–16.
• Loch, C. H. and Wu, Y., 2008. Social preferences and supply chain performance: an experimental study. Management Science, 54(11):1835–1849.
• McLaren, T., Head, M., and Yuan, Y., 2002. Supply chain collaboration alternatives: understanding the expected costs and benefits. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 12(4):348–364.
• Muthoo, A., 1996. A bargaining model based on the commitment tactic. Journal of Economic Theory, 69(1):134–152.
• Nagarajan, M. and Sosic, G., 2008. Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: review and extensions. European Journal of Operational Research, 187:719–745.
• Nash, J., 1950. The bargaining problem. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 155–162.
• Osborne, M. and Rubinstein, A., 1994. A course in game theory. MIT Press.
• Owen, G., 1995. Game Theory. Academic Press.
• Ozen, U., Slikker, M., and Norde, H., 2009. A general framework for cooperation under uncertainty. Operations Research Letters, 37(3):148–154.
• Pasternack, B. A., 1985. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Science, 4(2):166–176.
• Peleg, B., 1995. An axiomatization of the core of cooperative games without side payments. Game and Economic Theory: Selected Contributions in Honor of Robert J. Aumann, pages 265–276.
• Qin, Z. and Yang, J., 2008. Analysis of a revenue-sharing contract in supply chain management. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 11(1):17–29.
• Rubin, P. A. and Carter, J. R., 1990. Joint optimality in buyer-supplier negotiations:. Journal of purchasing and materials management, 26(2):20–26.
• Rubinstein, A., 1982. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 50(1):97–109.
• Rudi, N., Kapur, S., and Pyke, D. F., 2001. A two-location inventory model with transshipment and local decision making. Management Science, 47(12):1668–1680.
• Ryu, K. and Yucesan, E., 2010. A fuzzy newsvendor approach to supply chain coordination. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(2):421–438.
• Sajadieh, M. S., Thorstenson, A., and Jokar, M. R. A., 2010. An integrated vendor-buyer model with stock-dependent demand. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, In Press.
• Sarmah, S. P., Acharya, D., and Goyal, S. K., 2006. Buyer vendor coordination models in supply chain management. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1):1–15.
• Schweitzer, M. E. and Cachon, G. P., 2000. Decision bias in the newsvendor problem with a known demand distribution: Experimental evidence. Management Science, 46(3):404– 420.
• Shin, H. and Benton, W. C., 2007. A quantity discount approach to supply chain coordination. European Journal of Operational Research, 180(2):601–616.
• Slikker, M., Fransoo, J., and Wouters, M., 2005. Cooperation between multiple news-vendors with transshipments. European Journal of Operational Research, 167(2):370–380.
• Sošić, G., 2006. Transshipment of inventories among retailers: Myopic vs. farsighted stability. Management science, 52(10):1493–1508.
• Spengler, J., 1950. Vertical integration amnd antitrust policy. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4):347–352.
• Su, X., 2009. Consumer returns policies and supply chain performance. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 11(4):595–612.
• Suakkaphong, N. and Dror, M., 2010. Managing decentralized inventory and transshipment. TOP, pages 1–27.
• Sucky, E., 2006. A bargaining model with asymmetric information for a single supplier-single buyer problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 171(2):516–535.
• Taylor, T. A., 2002. Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects. Management Science, 48(8):992–1007.
• Thomas, D. J. and Griffin, P. M., 1996. Coordinated supply chain management. European Journal of Operational Research, 94(1):1–15.
• Tomlin, B., 2003. Capacity investments in supply chains: Sharing the gain rather than sharing the pain. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 5(4):317–333.
• Tsay, A. A., 1999. The quantity flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives. Management Science, 45(10):1339–1358.
• Tsay, A. A., Nahmias, S., and Agrawal, N., 1999. Quantitative models for supply chain management, chapter Modeling supply chain contracts: A review, pages 299–336. Kluwer.
• Ulku, S., Toktay, B., and Yucesan, E., 2007. Risk ownership in contract manufacturing. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 9(3):225–241.
• Van Mieghem, J. A., 2003. Capacity management, investment, and hedging: review and recent developments. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 5(4):269–302.
• Wang, Q. and Parlar, M., 1994. A three-person game theory model arising in stochastic inventory control theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 76(1):83–97.
• Wang, Y., Jiang, L., and Shen, Z. J., 2004. Channel performance under consignment contract with revenue sharing. Management Science, 50(1):34–47.
• Wei, Y. and Choi, T.-M., 2010. Mean-variance analysis of supply chains under wholesale pricing and profit sharing schemes. European Journal of Operational Research, 204(2):255–262.
• Wu, S. D., 2004. Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis: Modeling in the E-Business Era, chapter Supply chain intermediation: A bargaining theoretic framework, pages 67–115. Kluwer.
• Xu, R. and Zhai, X., 2010. Analysis of supply chain coordination under fuzzy demand in a two-stage supply chain. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(1):129–139.
• Yano, C. and Gilbert, S., 2005. Coordinated pricing and production/procurement decisions: A review. Managing Business Interfaces, pages 65–103.
• Yao, Z., Leung, S., and Lai, K., 2008a. Analysis of the impact of price-sensitivity factors on the returns policy in coordinating supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(1):275–282.
• Yao, Z., Leung, S., and Lai, K., 2008b. Manufacturer’s revenue-sharing contract and retail competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(2):637–651.
• Zaccour, G., 2008. On the coordination of dynamic marketing channels and two-part tariffs. Automatica, 44(5):1233–1239.
• Zhang, F., 2006. Competition, cooperation, and information sharing in a two-echelon assembly system. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 8(3):273–291.
• Zhao, H., Deshpande, V., and Ryan, J., 2006. Emergency transshipment in decentralized dealer networks: When to send and accept transshipment requests. Naval Research Logistics, 53(6):547–567.
• Zhao, X. and Atkins, D., 2009. Transshipment between competing retailers. IIE Transactions, 41(8):665–676.
• Zijm, H. and Timmer, J., 2008. Coordination mechanisms for inventory control in threeechelon serial and distribution systems. Annals of Operations Research, 158(1):161–182.
• Zimmer, K., 2002. Supply chain coordination with uncertain just-in-time delivery. International journal of production economics, 77(1):1–15.
• Zipkin, P. H., 2000. Foundations of inventory management. McGraw-Hill Boston.
• Zou, X., Pokharel, S., and Piplani, R., 2008. A two-period supply contract model for a decentralized assembly system. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(1):257–274.