A proposition of knowledge management methodology for the purpose of reasoning with the use of an upper-ontology

• Autorzy: Szymański K. , Dobrowolski G. , Koźlak J. , Zygmunt A.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Propozycja metodologii do zarządzania wiedzą na cele wnioskowania z wykorzystaniem ontologii wyższego poziomu

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article describes a proposition of knowledge organization for the purpose of reasoning using an upper-ontology. It presents a model of integrated ontologies architecture which consists of a domain ontologies layer with instances, a shared upper-ontology layer with additional rules and a layer of ontologies mapping concrete domain ontologies with the upper-ontology. Thanks to the upper-ontology, new facts were concluded from domain ontologies during the reasoning process. A practical realization proposition is given as well. It is based on some popular Semantic Web technologies and tools, such as OWL, SWRL, nRQL, Protege and Racer.

PL

Artykuł przedstawia propozycję organizacji wiedzy na cele wnioskowania z wykorzystaniem ontologii wyższego poziomu. Prezentuje model architektury zintegrowanych ontologii, składający się z ontologii domenowych z instancjami, współdzielonej ontologii wyższego poziomu z dodatkowymi regułami oraz z warstwy ontologii mapujących. Dzięki wiedzy wyższego poziomu uzyskano nowe fakty podczas wnioskowania. Zaprezentowano rownież propozycje praktycznej realizacji omawianego podejścia przy użyciu popularnych narzędzi i technologii dla Semantic Web, takich jak OWL, SWRL, nRQL, Protege i Racer.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ontology; knowledge management; ontology integration; upper ontology; reasoning

PL

ontologia; zarządzanie wiedzą; integracja ontologii; ontologia wyższego poziomu; wnioskowanie

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwa AGH
• Czasopismo: Computer Science
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: Vol. 8, Spec. Ed
• Strony: 117--133
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Szymański K.

• Institute of Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland

autor

Dobrowolski G.

• Institute of Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland

autor

Koźlak J.

• Institute of Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland

autor

Zygmunt A.

• Institute of Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Baader F. et al.: The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, 2003
• [2] Euzenat J., Le Bach T., Barrasa J., Bouquet P., De Bo J., Dieng R., Ehrig M., Hauswirth M., Jarrar M., Lara R., Maynard D., Napoli A., Stamou G., Stuckenschmidt H., Shvaiko P., Tessaris S., Van Acker S., Zaihrayeu I.: State of the art on ontology alignment. Knowledge Web Deliverable, Technical Report, INRIA, 2004
• [3] Fridman N., Musen M.: SMART: Automated Support for Ontology Merging and Alignment. Twelth Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, Banff, Canada, 1999
• [4] Gruber T.: What is an Ontology. http://www-ksl.Stanford.edu/kst/what-is-an-ontology.html
• [5] Haase P., Motik B.: A Mapping System for the Integration of OWL-DL Ontologies. IHIS'05, Bremen, November 2005
• [6] Haarslev V., Moller R.: RACER User's Guide and Reference Manual. 2004
• [7] Horridge M., Knublauch H. et al.: A Practical Guide To Building Ontologies Using The Protege-OWL Plugin and CO-ODE Tools, 1st ed., University of Manchester, 2004
• [8] Horrocks I., van Harmelen F., Patel-Schneider P. et al.: DAML + OIL. http:// www.daml.org/2001/03/daml+oil-index.html, 2001
• [9] Hunter J.: The Semantic Web. 2002
• [10] Kalfoglou Y., Schorlemmer M.: Ontology Mapping: The State of the Art. The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 18:1, 2003, 1-31
• [11] Knublauch H.: The Protege-OWL API - Programmer's Guide. Stanford Medical Informatics, 2005
• [12] Lee T.B., Hendler J., Lassila O.: Semantic Web. 2001
• [13] LISP, http://www.lisp.org/alu/home
• [14] Łuszpaj A., Szymanski K., Zygmunt A., Kozlak J.: The Process of Integra- ting Ontologies for Knowledge Base Systems. 7th Software Engineering Conference Cracow 2005
• [15] McGuinness D.L., van Harmelen F.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/, W3C Recommendation, 2004
• [16] Namyoun C, Il-Yeol S., Hyoil H.: A Survey on Ontology Mapping. SIGMOD Record, Vol. 35, No. 3, Sep. 2006
• [17] Niles I., Pease A.: Towards a Standard Upper Ontology. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems. FOIS-2001
• [18] Pazienza M. T., Stellato A. et al.: Ontology Mapping to support ontology-based question answering. 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-2005) Galway, Ireland, November, 2005
• [19] Pinto H. S., Martins J. P.: Ontology Integration - How to perform the process. Portugal 2001
• [20] Pinto H. S., Martins J. P.: Some Issues on Ontology Integration. Portugal 2001
• [21] Racer Systems, http://www.racer-systems.com/
• [22] Resource Description Framework (RDF), http: //www. w3. org/RDF
• [23] RICE, http://www.ronaldcornet.nl/rice/
• [24] Standard Upper Ontology Working Group (SUO WG). http://suo.ieee.org/ index.html
• [25] Standard Upper Ontology Working Group (SUO WG) Suggested Upper Merged Ontology, http://suo.ieee.org/SUO/SUMO/index.html
• [26] SUMO Ontology, http://ontology.teknowledge.com/
• [27] Tamma V.: An Ontology Model Supporting Multiple Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing. Thesis of University of Liverpool, 2001
• [28] The New Racer Query Language. http://www.cs.concordia.ca/~haarslev/racer/racer-queries.pdf
• [29] W3C: SWRL - A Semantic Web Rule Language. 2004
• [30] Welcome to the Protege Project, http://protege.stanford.edu/