Occupational safety and health as an element of a complex compensation system evaluation within an organization

• Autorzy: Beck-Krala E. , Klimkiewicz K.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Occupational safety and health (OSH) plays a significant role in today’s organizations, because it helps in attracting and retaining employees as well as molding their attitudes and behaviors at work. This is why the issue of OSH is stressed in a comprehensive approach to employee rewards: the total reward concept. This article explains how OSH may be included in a complex evaluation process of the compensation system. Although the literature on the effectiveness of employee compensation refers mainly to financial and non-financial components, there is a need for inclusion of working conditions in such analyses. An evaluation of the compensation system that incorporates OSH can drive many benefits for both the organization and employees. Obtaining such benefits, however, requires systematic evaluation of the reward system, including OSH. Incorporation of OSH issue within the comprehensive analysis of compensation systems promotes responsible behavior of all stakeholders.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

occupational safety and health; compensation evaluation model; supportive working environment

PL

bezpieczeństwo i higiena pracy; ocena zdrowia; środowisko pracy

• Wydawca: Taylor & Francis
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 22, No. 4
• Strony: 523--531
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 42 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Beck-Krala E.

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Poland

autor

Klimkiewicz K.

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Armstrong M, Cummins A. The reward management toolkit: a step-by-step guide to designing and delivering pay and benefits. London: Kogan Page; 2011.
• 2. Brandt-Rauf P, Burton WN, McCunney RJ. Health, productivity, and occupational medicine. J Occup Environ Med. 2001;43(1):1.
• 3. Herzberg F. One more time. How do you motivate employees? Boston (MA): Harvard Business Review Classic; 2008.
• 4. Kozioł. Trychotomy of motivating factors in the workplace: concept outline. Zeszyty Naukowe Małopolskiej Wyższej Szkoły Ekonomicznej w Tarnowie. 2011;2(19):45-54.
• 5. Rzepecki J. Cost and benefits of implementing an occupational safety and health management system (OSH MS) in enterprises in Poland. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2012;18(2):181–193. doi:doi:10.1080/10803548.2012.11076927.
• 6. Werbel J, Balkin DB. Are human resource practices linked to employee misconduct?: A rational choice perspective. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2010;20(4):317–326.
• 7. Rikhardsson PM. Accounting for the cost of occupational accidents. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2004;11(2):63–70.
• 8. Werbel J, Balkin DB. Are human resource practices linked to employee misconduct?: A rational choice perspective. Hum Resour Manag Rev. 2010;20(4):317-326.
• 9. Rikhardsson PM. Accounting for the cost of occupational accidents. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2004;11(2):63-70.
• 10. Buhai SI, Cottini E, Westergård-Nielsen N. How productive is workplace health and safety? [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.sebastianbuhai.com/papers/publications/firmperm_workenv.pdf
• 11. Beck-Krala E. Implementation of the methodology for compensation systems evaluation. Organ Manag. 2014;4(28):5-19.
• 12. Armstrong M, Brown D, Reilly P. Increasing the effectiveness of reward management: an evidence-based approach. Empl Relat. 2011;33(2):106-20.
• 13. Beck-Krala E, Scott D. Research design for compensation systems evaluation. 4th European Reward Management Conference. Brussels: European Institute for Advanced Studies in Management; 2013.
• 14. Corby S, White G, Stanworth C. No news is good news? Evaluating new pay systems. Hum Resour Manag J. 2005;15(1):4-24.
• 15. Scott D, McMullen T, Morajda D. Evaluating pay program effectiveness. WorldatWork J. 2006;(2):50–59.
• 16. Kearns P. Measuring human resources and the impact on bottom line improvements. Hitchin: Technical Communication; 1995.
• 17. Fitz-enz J. How to measure human resources management. New York (NY): McGraw Hill; 2001.
• 18. Milkovich GT, Newman JM. Compensation. San Francisco (CA): Jossey Bay; 2001.
• 19. Klimkiewicz K, Beck-Krala E. Responsible rewarding systems - the first step to explore the research area. Research Papers of Wrocław University of Economics. 2015;(387):66-78.
• 20. Li Y, Liu W, Li H. The theory of pay effectiveness. Int J Bus Manag. 2008;3(6):93-96.
• 21. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. The business benefits of good occupational safety and health (Factsheet 77). Bilbao: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work; 2007.
• 22. Kirkpatrick DL. Seven keys to unlock the four levels of evaluation. Perform Improv. 2006;45(7):5-8.
• 23. Phillips JJ. Accountability in human resource management. New York (NY): Routledge; 1996.
• 24. International Labour Office (ILO). Audit matrix for the ILO guidelines on occupational safety and health management systems (ILO-OSH 2001). Geneva: ILO; 2013 [cited 2015 Jan 7]. Available from: http://www.ilo.org/safework/info/publications/WCMS_214128/lang-en/index.htm
• 25. Mathis RL, Jackson JH. Human resource management. 13th ed. Mason (OH): South-Western/Cengage Learning; 2011.
• 26. Fruhen LS, Weis LM, Flin R. Attracting safe employees: how job adverts can affect applicants’ choices. Saf Sci. 2015;72:255–261.
• 27. Niskanen T, Lehtelä J, Länsikallio R. Application of a screening method in assessing occupational safety and health of computer workstations. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2014;20(1):167–174. doi:10.1080/10803548.2014.11077032
• 28. Niskanen T, Lehtelä J, Länsikallio R. Application of a screening method in assessing occupational safety and health of computer workstations. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2014;20(1):167–174. doi:10.1080/10803548.2014.11077032
• 29. Elmuti D, Kathawala Y. An overview of benchmarking process: a tool for continuous improvement and competitive advantage. Benchmarking Qual Manag Technol. 1997;4(4):229-243.
• 30. Elmuti D, Kathawala Y. An overview of benchmarking process: a tool for continuous improvement and competitive advantage. Benchmarking Qual Manag Technol. 1997;4(4):229-243.
• 31. Coyle IR, Sleeman SD, Adams N. Safety climate. J Safety Res. 1995;26(4):247–254.
• 32. Alhemood AM, Genaidy AM, Shell R, et al. Towards a model of safety climate measurement. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2004;10(4):303–318. doi:10.1080/10803548.2004.11076617
• 33. Aaltonen MVP. A consequence and cost analysis of occupational accidents in the furniture industry. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 1966.
• 34. Rikhardsson PM, Impgaard M. Corporate cost of occupational accidents: an activity-based analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 2004;36(2):173-182.
• 35. Hinze J, Thurman S, Wehle A. Leading indicators of construction safety performance. Saf Sci. 2013;51(1):23–28.
• 36. American Petroleum Institute (API). Process safety performance indicators for the refining and petrochemical industries; 2010.
• 37. Sinelnikov S, Inouye J, Kerper S. Using leading indicators to measure occupational health and safety performance. Saf Sci. 2015;72:240-248.
• 38. Flin R, Mearns K, O’Connor P, et al. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. Saf Sci. 2000;34(1-3):177-192.
• 39. Zohar D. Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. J Appl Psychol. 1980;65(1):96-102.
• 40. Conchie SM. Transformational leadership, intrinsic motivation, and trust: a moderated-mediated model of workplace safety. J Occup Health Psychol. 2013;18(2):198-210.41.
• 41. Mathis TL. Formulas for leading safety excellence. EHS Today. 2012;5(11):32-34.
• 42. Cornelissen PA, van Hoof JJ, van Vuuren M. Enabling employees to work safely: the influence of motivation and ability in the design of safety instructions. Tech Commun. 2014;61(4):232-244.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.