Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The concrete-filled steel tube (CFT) composite frames using blind bolts and buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) have been studied with the development of building industrialization and energy dissipation technology. However, there has been no research so far on the probabilistic seismic fragility analysis for the blind-bolted end-plate CFT composite frames with BRBs (BRB-BECFT). Therefore, a total of 6-, 9-, 12- and 20-story BRB-BECFT prototype structures were designed based on the performance-based plastic design method. The results obtained from nonlinear static and dynamic analyses indicated that the four structures achieved predefined performance objectives in terms of story drift, joint rotation, and BRB ductility demand. Subsequently, fragility curves including non-collapse and collapse states were established to evaluate the behavior of the structure for a given intensity measure using the incremental dynamic analysis approach. Meanwhile, the geometric mean of spectral acceleration over a period range (Sa,avg) was selected as the intensity measure to assess the structural collapse capacity. Results showed that the adoption of Sa,avg can result in 32–42% lower data dispersion for the determination of collapse point, and simplification of the process of calculation of the collapse margin ratio of a structure. Furthermore, based on the combination of Sa,avg, residual story drift and BRB core plate strain, a framework of probabilistic seismic damage analysis of structures for combined damage evaluation at three levels of the system, subsystem, and component was summarized and conducted by the 6- and 12-story case study. This is practically useful to assess structural damage state after an earthquake because it could present more information on the probability distribution of various damage scenarios.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
541--562
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 40 poz., rys., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
- School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Anhui Province, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 10084, People’s Republic of China
autor
- School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, Anhui Province, People’s Republic of China
- Anhui Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Steel Structure Technology and Industrialization, Hefei 230009, People’s Republic of China
autor
- School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, People’s Republic of China
autor
- Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 10084, People’s Republic of China
Bibliografia
- [1] Wang J, Li B, Chou C, Chen L. Cyclic experimental and analytical studies of buckling-restrained braces with various gusset connections. Eng Struct. 2018;163:38–50.
- [2] Wang CL, Liu Y, Zhou L. Experimental and numerical studies on hysteretic behavior of all-steel bamboo-shaped energy dissipaters. Eng Struct. 2018;165:38–49.
- [3] Sun H, Jia M, Zhang S, Wang Y. Study of buckling-restrained braces with concrete infilled GFRP tubes. Thin-Walled Struct. 2019;136:16–33.
- [4] Katsimpini PS, Askouni PK, Papagiannopoulos GA, Karabalis DL. Seismic drift response of seesaw-braced and buckling-restrained braced steel structures: a comparison study. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2020;129:105925.
- [5] Tsai KC, Hsiao PC. Pseudo-dynamic test of a full-scale CFT/BRB frame-Part II: seismic performance of buckling-restrained braces and connections. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2008;37(7):1099–115.
- [6] Di Sarno L, Manfredi G. Experimental tests on full-scale RC unretrofitted frame and retrofitted with buckling-restrained braces. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2012;41:315–33.
- [7] Zhang Z, Zhang SN, Deng EF, Zhou TT, Yi Y, He H, Li NN. Experimental study on seismic performance of double-level yielding buckling-restrained braced concrete frames. Arch Civ Mech Eng. 2020;20:44.
- [8] Wang J, Zhang H. Seismic performance assessment of blind bolted steel-concrete composite joints based on pseudo-dynamic testing. Eng Struct. 2017;131:192–206.
- [9] Wang J, Lu J, Zhang H, Zhao C. Experimental investigation on seismic performance of endplate composite joints to CFST columns. J Constr Steel Res. 2018;145:352–67.
- [10] Ataei A, Bradford MA, Valipour HR, Liu X. Experimental study of sustainable high strength steel flush end plate beam-to-column composite joints with deconstructable bolted shear connectors. Eng Struct. 2016;123:124–40.
- [11] Waqas R, Uy B, Thai HT. Experimental and numerical behaviour of blind bolted flush endplate composite connections. J Constr Steel Res. 2019;153:179–95.
- [12] Wang J, Li B, Wang D, Zhao C. Cyclic testing of steel beam blind bolted to CFST column composite frames with SBTD concrete slabs. Eng Struct. 2017;148:293–311.
- [13] Wang J, Wang H. Cyclic experimental behavior of CFST column to steel beam frames with blind bolted connections. Int J Steel Struct. 2018;18(3):773–92.
- [14] Li B, Wang J, Lu Y, Zhang Z, Wang J. Seismic response tests and analytical assessment of blind bolted assembly CFST frames with beam-connected SPSWs. Eng Struct. 2019;178:343–60.
- [15] Li B, Wang J, Baniotopoulos CC, Yang J, Hu Y. Seismic design and pseudo-dynamic tests of blind-bolted CFT frames with buckling-restrained braces. J Constr Steel Res. 2020;167:105857.
- [16] Li B, Wang J, Yang J, Pan X, Baniotopoulos CC. Pseudo-dynamic response and analytical evaluation of blind bolted CFT frames with BRBs. J Constr Steel Res. 2020;166:195744.
- [17] Kammula V, Erochko J, Kwon OS, Christopoulos C. Application of hybrid-simulation to fragility assessment of the telescoping self-centering energy dissipative bracing system. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2014;43(6):811–30.
- [18] Liao KW, Wang YI, Chen CC. Probabilistic seismic performance evaluation of steel moment frame using high-strength and high-ductility steel. Constr Build Mater. 2018;184:151–64.
- [19] Yang TY, Li Y, Leelataviwat S. Performance-based design and optimization of buckling restrained knee braced truss moment frame. J Perform Constr Fac. 2014;28(6):A4014007.
- [20] Shin J, Kim J, Lee K. Seismic assessment of damaged piloti-type RC building subjected to successive earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2014;43(11):1603–19.
- [21] Chieffo N, Clementi F, Formisano A, Lenci S. Comparative fragility methods for seismic assessment of masonry building located in Muccia (Italy). J Build Eng. 2019;25:100813.
- [22] Poiani M, Gazzani V, Clementi F, Lenci S. Aftershock fragility assessment of Italian cast-in-place RC industrial structures with precast vaults. J Build Eng. 2020;29:101206.
- [23] FEMA P695. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Federal emergency management agency, 2009. Washington, DC.
- [24] Tahmasebi E. Damage analysis of steel concentrically braced frame systems under seismic conditions. Bethlehem: Lehigh University; 2016.
- [25] AISC. Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. ANSI/AISC 341–10, American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL, 2010.
- [26] Goel SC, Chao SH. Performance-based plastic design: earthquake-resistant steel structures. International Code Council; 2008.
- [27] Chao SH, Goel SC, Lee SS. A seismic design lateral force distribution based on inelastic state of structures. Earthq Spectra. 2007;23(3):547–69.
- [28] GB 50011–2010. Code for seismic design of buildings. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press; 2010 [in Chinese].
- [29] Mazzolani FM, Piluso V. Plastic design of seismic resistant steel frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1997;26:167–91.
- [30] Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees). http:// opens ees. berke ley. edu/.
- [31] Han LH, Yao GH, Zhao XL. Tests and calculations for hollow structural steel (HSS) stub columns filled with self-consolidating concrete (SCC). J Constr Steel Res. 2005;61(9):1241–69.
- [32] Tort C, Hajjar JF. Mixed finite-element modeling of rectangular concrete-filled steel tube members and frames under static and dynamic loads. J Struct Eng. 2010;136(6):654–64.
- [33] Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. J Struct Eng. 2002;128(4):526–33.
- [34] Ellingwood BR, Kinali K. Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment. Struct Saf. 2009;31(2):179–87.
- [35] Zhao J, Wu B, Ou J. A novel type of angle steel buckling-restrained brace: cyclic behavior and failure mechanism. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2011;40(10):1083–102.
- [36] Zhao J, Lin F, Wang Z. Effect of non-moment braced frame seismic deformations on buckling-restrained brace end connection behavior: theoretical analysis and subassemblage tests. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2016;45(3):359–81.
- [37] Li W, Wu B, Ding Y, Zhao J. Experimental performance of buckling-restrained braces with steel cores of H-section and half-wavelength evaluation of higher-order local buckling. Adv Struct Eng. 2017;20(4):641–57.
- [38] Chen Q, Wang CL, Meng S, Zeng B. Effect of the unbonding materials on the mechanic behavior of all-steel buckling restrained braces. Eng Struct. 2016;111:478–93.
- [39] Wang CL, Chen Q, Zeng B, Meng S. A novel brace with partial buckling restraint: an experimental and numerical investigation. Eng Struct. 2017;150:190–202.
- [40] Qu B, Liu X, Hou H, Qiu C, Hu D. Testing of buckling-restrained braces with replaceable steel angle fuses. J Struct Eng. 2018;144(3):04018001.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-afb613bc-2313-439d-a20c-4c395be600a2