Multi-trait evaluation of value for cultivation and use of early maturing edible potato cultivars registered in Poland

• Autorzy: Rymuza K.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/586

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The work presents an analysis of diversity and comparison of value for cultivation and use of early maturing potato cultivars registered with the Polish National Register of Cultivars. The comparison was based on 17 yield and appearance traits and quality attributes of tubers as well as their resistance to diseases. The analysis employed the following multi-dimensional statistical methods: principal component analysis and cluster analysis. The principal component analysis revealed that over 70% of the total variation was associated with the first 6 principal components. Cluster analysis yielded 4 groups of genotypes. The first group consisted of the cultivars which produced tubers with the most shallow eyes, the best flavour and the least severe darkening of raw flesh. The cultivars in the second group produced high yields and were low in starch, dry matter and glycoalkaloids. The tubers of cultivars which were classified into the third group had the highest starch, dry matter and vitamin C contents. However, they produced the lowest yields and were quite susceptible to most diseases. The fourth group was made up of high-yielding cultivars which tended to accumulate glycoalkaloids but were most resistant to hollow heart in tubers.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

edible potato; potato cultivar; principal component analysis; cluster analysis

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 16, nr 1
• Strony: 50--56
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 38 poz., tab., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Rymuza K.

• Department of Quantitative Methods and Spatial Management, University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce, Prusa 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Ahmadizadeh M., Felenji H., 2011. Evaluating diversity among potato cultivars using agro-morphological and yield components in fall cultivation of Jiroft area. American-Eurasin Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science, 11(5), 655–662.
• 2. Arslanoglu F., Aytac S., Karaca-Oner E., 2011. Morphological characterization of the local potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotypes collected from Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(6), 922–932.
• 3. Arvanitoyannis I.S., Mavromatis A.G., Vaitsi O., Korkovelos A., Golia E., 2012. Effect of genotype and geographical origin on potato properties (physical and sensory) for authenticity purposes. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4(4), 63–74.
• 4. Badenes M.L., Martinez-Calvo J., Llacer G., 1998. Analysis of apricot germplasm from the European ecogeogaphical group. Euphytica 102, 93–99.
• 5. Charmet G., Balfourier F., Monestiez P., 1994. Hierarchical clustering of perennial ryegrass populations with geographic contiguity constraint. Theoretical and Applied Genetic, 88, 42–48.
• 6. Chotkowski J., Rembeza J., 2005. Consumer Preferences and Changes in Potato Consumption. Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomistów Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu 7(8), 42–49 (in Polish).
• 7. Dwoŕák P., Homouz K., Jůzl M., Erhatova D., 2006. Influence of row covering with non-woven textile on tubers quality in early potatoes. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych, 511, 225–231.
• 8. Friedman M., McDonald G.M., 1997. Potato glycoalkaloids: chemistry, analysis, safety and plant physiology. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 16, 55–132.
• 9. Grużewska A., Biesiada-Drzazga B., Markowska M., 2009. An application of multidimensional comparative analysis in research on broiler chicken commercial lines. Archiv für Geflugelkunde, 73, 132–138.
• 10. Hall R.L., 1992. Toxicological burdens and the shifting burden of toxicology. Food Technology, 46, 109–114.
• 11. Hamouz K., Lachman J., Dvořák P., Trnková E., 2006. Influence of non-woven fleece on the yield formation of early potatoes. Plant, Soil and Environment, 52 (7), 289–294.
• 12. Hamouz K., Lachman J., Hajtmánkoa K., Pazderul M., Ćižek M, Dvořak P., 2010. Effect of natural and growing conditions on the content of phenolics in potatoes with different flesh colour. Plant, Soil and Environment, 56, 368–374.
• 13. Haydar A., Ahmed A.B., Hannan M.M., Razvy M.A., 2007. Analysis of genetic diversity in some potato varieties grown in Bangladesh. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 2(3-4), 143–145.
• 14. Iezzoni A.F., Pritts M.P., 1991. Application of principal components analysis to horticultural research. Horticulturae Science, 26(4), 334–338.
• 15. Kreutzmann S., Bassompierre M., Kistrup A., Buch L., Engelsen S.B., 2011. Exploratory study of potato cultivar differences in sensory and hedonistic applicability tests. Potato Research, 54, 13–28.
• 16. Lotti C., Marcotrigiano A.R., De Giovanni C., Resta P., Ricciardi A., Zonno V., Fanizza G., Ricciardi L., 2008. Univariate and multivariate analysis performed on bio-agronomical traits of Cucumis melo L. germplasm. Euphytica, 55, 511–522.
• 17. Madlaina K., Schmid P., Kölliker R., Boller B., 2008. Value of permanent grassland habitats as reservoirs of Festuca pratensis Huds. and Lolium multiflorum Lam. populations for breeding and conservation. Euphytica, 164, 239–253.
• 18. Mądry W., Pluta S., Sieczko L., Studnicki M., 2010. Phenotypic diversity in a sample of blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.) cultivars maintained in the Fruit Breeding Department at the Research Institute of Pomology and Floriculture in Skierniewice, Poland. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 18, 23–37.
• 19. Mohamed V.O., Zein E., Fouteye M., Taleb K., Trifi M., Ali O., 2011. Use of multivariate analysis to assess phenotypic diversity of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae, 127, 367–371.
• 20. Mohammadi S.A., Prasanna B.M., 2003. Analysis of genetic diversity in crop plants – Salient statistical tools and considerations. Crop Science, 43, 1235–1248.
• 21. Murnice I., Karklina D., Galoburda R., Santare D., Skrabule I., Costa H.S., 2011. Nutritional composition of freshly harvested and stored Latvian potato varieties depending on traditional cooking methods. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 24, 699–710.
• 22. Nikolic D., Rakonjac V., Milatovic D., Fotiric M., 2010. Multivariate analysis of vineyard peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.] germplasm collection. Euphytica, 171, 227–234.
• 23. Oruna-Concha M.J., Duckham S.C., Ames J.M., 2002. Comparison of the volatile components of eight cultivars of potato after microwave baking. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und Technologie, 35(1), 80–86.
• 24. Pluta S., Mądry W., Sieczko L., 2012. Phenotypic diversity for agronomic traits in a collection of blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.) cultivars evaluated in Poland. Scientia Horticulturae, 145, 136–144.
• 25. Rakonjac V., Fotiric A.M., Nikolic D., Milatowic D., Colic S., 2010. Morphological characterization of Oblacinska sour cherry cultivars in a germplasm bank at Portugal. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 55, 593–601.
• 26. Rykaczewska K., 2007. Productivity of early lock and foreign potato cultivars. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych, 517, 629–638 (in Polish).
• 27. Rymuza K., Bombik A., 2012. Comparison of edible potato cultivars by means of some methods of multidimensional analysis. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Agricultura, 11(1), 67–77.
• 28. Rymuza K., Turska E., Wielogórska G., Bombik A., 2012. Use of principal component analysis for the assessment of spring wheat characteristics. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Agricultura, 11(1), 79–90.
• 29. Styszko L., 2004. Breeding of starch potato cultivars with high utility parameters. Biuletyn IHAR, 232, 275–283 (in Polish).
• 30. Styszko L., Modzelewski T., Kamasa J., Majewski A. 2001. Relationship between morphological characteristics of potato tubers and starch content and starch yield. Zeszyty Naukowe AR Wocław, 415(80), 283–293 (in Polish).
• 31. Styszko L., Modzelewski T., Kamasa J., Majewski A., 2003. The relationship between a type of cooking quality (culinary) and morphological features of potato tubers. Biul IHAR, 226/227/2, 533–538.
• 32. Tarant Sz., 2005. Taste as a main criterion of food products in consumers’ evaluation. Roczniki Naukowe Stowarzyszenia Ekonomiki Rolnictwa i Agrobiznesu 7(8), 267–270 (in Polish).
• 33. Thybo AK., Bechmann IE., Martens M., Engelsen SB., 2000. Prediction of sensory texture of cooked potatoes using uniaxial compression, near infrared spectroscopy and low field 1H NMR spectroscopy. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 33(2), 103–111.
• 34. Thygesen LG., Thybo AK., Engelsen SB., 2001. Prediction of sensory texture quality of cooked potatoes from low-field 1H NMR of raw potatoes. The role of chemical constituents. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 34(7), 469–477.
• 35. Trawczyński C., Wierzbicka A., 2011. The reaction of new potato cultivars to nitrogen fertilization. Bul. IHAR, 259, 193–201 (in Polish).
• 36. Veronesi F., Falcinelli M., 1988. Evaluation of an Italian germplasm collection of Festuca arundinacea Schreb. through a multivariate analysis. Euphytica, 28, 211–220.
• 37. Wierzbicka A., 2012. Effect of variety, harvest date and nitrogen fertilization on the content of starch and dry matter in early potatoes tubers. Fragmenta Agronomica, 29(2), 134–142 (in Polish).
• 38. Zgórska K., Grudzińska M., 2012. Changes in selected quality parameters of potato tubers during storage. Acta Agrophysica, 19(1), 203–214 (in Polish).