Prospects and Potential for Biomethane Production in Ukraine

• Autorzy: Geletukha Georgii , Kucheruk Petro , Matveev Yuri

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12912/27197050/149995

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Prospects and potential for the development of biomethane production in Ukraine are presented. The biomethane potential due to anaerobic digestion from the most prospective feedstock types is estimated as 9.7 billion m³ CH₄/year in 2020. At the level of regions of Ukraine, 60% of the potential for biomethane production is concentrated in all regions of the central part of country (Vinnytsia, Cherkasy, Dnipropetrovsk, Poltava and Kirovohrad regions), two regions of the northern part of Ukraine (Kyiv and Chernihiv regions), one region of the western part of Ukraine (Khmelnytsky region) and one region of the eastern part of Ukraine (Kharkiv region). Comparative analysis of two main renewable gases - biomethane and green hydrogen - has been carried out. It is shown that greatest prospects are associated with combination of biomethane and green hydrogen advantages, which involves the conversion of hydrogen into methane with subsequent supply to distribution or main gas networks. The use of such a scheme will allow in addition to AD potential of biomethane to add 6.8 billion m³/year of synthetic methane, which can be obtained from methanation of CO₂ from biomethane plants and green hydrogen.The total biomethane production in Ukraine could reach 1.0 billion m³/year in 2030. It is expected that biomethane could partly be exported to the EU. The rest could be utilized locally for combined heat and electricity generation in CHP units, heating and industry applications and for transportation purpose. In such a way biogas sector could serve the growing demand in sustainable and clean energy from the transport and industry sectors.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

bioenergy; biomass; biogas; biomethane; green hydrogen

• Wydawca: Lubelski Oddział Polskiego Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology ; WNGB Wydawnictwo Naukowe
• Czasopismo: Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 23, iss. 4
• Strony: 67--80
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Geletukha Georgii

• Institute of Engineering Thermophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2a Marii Kapnist Str., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine

autor

Kucheruk Petro

• Institute of Engineering Thermophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2a Marii Kapnist Str., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine

autor

Matveev Yuri

• Institute of Engineering Thermophysics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2a Marii Kapnist Str., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-5612

Bibliografia

• 1. IEA. 2020. Outlook for biogas and biomethane. Prospects for organic growth. World Energy Outlook Special Report. France. https://www.iea.org/reports/outlook-for-biogas-and-biomethane-prospects-for-organic-growth
• 2. Cedigaz. 2019. Global biomethane market: green gas goes global. https://www.cedigaz.org/global-biomethane-market-green-gas-goes-global/
• 3. EBA. 2021. Statistical Report of the European Biogas Association 2021. Brussels, Belgium, Noivember 2021.
• 4. EBA. 2020. Statistical Report of the European Biogas Association 2020. Brussels, Belgium, Jonuary 2021. https://www.europeanbiogas.eu/eba-statistical-report-2020/#:~:text=This%202020%20EBA%20Statistical%20Report,and%20biomethane%20sectors%20in%20Europe.
• 5. Eyl-Mazzega M.A., Mathieu C. (eds.). 2019. Biogas and Biomethane in Europe: Lessons from Denmark, Germany and Italy. Etudes de l’Ifri, Ifri.
• 6. Geletukha G., Zheliezna T. 2021. Prospects for Bioenergy Development in Ukraine: Roadmap until 2050. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 22(5). 73-81.
• 7. Geletukha G., Zheliezna T., Dragnev S., Haidai. 2022. Ten actions of Ukraine to reject Russian natural Gas. UABio Position Paper #28. April 2022. https://uabio.org/en/materials/12834/
• 8. VNTP-APK-09.06. 2006. Systems of removal, processing, preparation and use of manure. Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine, Kyiv.
• 9. Kuznetsova V., et al. 2006. Preparation and processing dung on poultry farms. Research and practical recommendations. VNYTYP, Serhiyev Posad.
• 10. Dubrovin V., Golub G., Dragnev S., Geletukha G., Zhelezna T., Matveev Y., Kucheruk P., Kudrya S., Zabarny G., Maslyukova Z. 2013. Methods of generalized assessment of technically achievable energy potential of biomass. Viol-Print, Kyiv.
• 11. FNR. 2006. Handreichchung. Biogasgewinnung und -nutzung. FNR, Gulzow.
• 12. Geletukha G., Zheliezna T. 2014. Prospects for the use of agricultural residues for energy production in Ukraine. UABio Position Paper #7. UABio, Kyiv.
• 13. Kolchina L. 2012. Technologies and equipment for the cultivation and harvesting of sugar beet: a reference book. Rosinformagrotech, Moskow.
• 14. Kucheruk P., Matveev Y., Rudska V. 2018. Experimental study of biogas yield from straw in anaerobic digestion process. Renewable Energy, 2, 88–97.
• 15. Moset V., et al. 2015. Optimization of methane yield by using straw briquettes- influence of additives and mold size. Industrial Crops and Products, 74, 925–932.
• 16. Kaldis F., et al. 2020. Anaerobic digestion of steamexploded wheat straw and co-digestion strategies for enhanced biogas production. Applied Sciences, 10(22), 8284, 1–12.
• 17. Kucheruk P. 2016. The effect of adding co-substrates on the intensity and stability of the anaerobic digestion process. Proceedings of the Fourth International Scientific and Practical Conference “Pure water. Fundamental, applied and industrial aspects”, 114–116.
• 18. Kucheruk P., Matveev Y. 2017. Research and development of biogas production technology from sugar industry by-products. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference “Problems of Thermophysics and Heat Engineering”, 47.
• 19. Tovazhnyansky L., et al. 2008. Food Technology in the examples and problems: a textbook for university students. Centre of education books, Kyiv.
• 20. Dubrovskis V., Plume I., Straume I. 2019. Use of ethanol production and stillage processing residues for biogas production. Agronomy Research, 17(5), 1881–1890. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.19.172
• 21. Szaja A., et al. 2020. The effect of brewery spent grain application on biogas yields and kinetics in co-digestion with sewage sludge. PeerJ, 8, e10590.
• 22. Mohanty A., et al. 2021. A critical review on biogas production from edible and non-edible oil cakes. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 12, 949–966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-021-01292-5
• 23. Vasilyeva R. 2006. Production accounting and reporting for the dairy industry. ESSTU, Ulan-Ude.
• 24. Escalante H., et al. 2018. Anaerobic digestion of cheese whey: Energetic and nutritional potential for the dairy sector in developing countries. Waste Management, 71, 711–718.
• 25. Wärtsilä. 2020. Optimal way of Ukrainian energy system development. Analytical report on energy system optimization. Wärtsilä Finland Oy. https://vse.energy/publication/1497-feh
• 26. Geletukha G., Matveev Yu. 2021. Prospects of biomethane production in Ukraine. Thermophysics and Thermal Power Engineering, 43(3), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.31472/ttpe.3.2021.8