Modelling the processes of taking over the watch from an autonomous navigation system

• Autorzy: Hochgeschurz S. , Dalinger E. , Motz F.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.15.01.11

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The maritime industry is striving towards increasing levels of autonomy within the field of navigation. However, fully autonomous vessel navigation requires an extraordinarily complex system. As a step towards full autonomy and to reduce system complexity, nautical officers should still be available on board to take over the watch from the autonomous system in situations, in which human intervention is required. Therefore, a highly advanced human-machine interface (HMI) is essential, which supports nautical officers in retrieving all necessary information in order to manage the takeover. The implementation of the autonomous system and introduction of an HMI creates new processes, which need to be defined. In this paper, we portray our approach to define the processes for watch handovers from the autonomous system to nautical officers by investigating current watch handover processes. Subsequently, the resulting process models are described and discussed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

autonomous vessels; autonomous navigation system; navigation system; human machine interface; operational design domain; taking over the watch; officer of the watch; AutoOOW

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 15 No. 1
• Strony: 117--126
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Hochgeschurz S.

• Fraunhofer Institute for Communication, Wachtberg, Germany

autor

Dalinger E.

• Fraunhofer Institute for Communication, Wachtberg, Germany

autor

Motz F.

• Fraunhofer Institute for Communication, Wachtberg, Germany

Bibliografia

• 1. Abilio Ramos, M., Utne, I.B., Mosleh, A.: Collision avoidance on maritime autonomous surface ships: Operators’ tasks and human failure events. Safety Science. 116, 33–44 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.038.
• 2. Allweyer, T.: Business process management: strategy, design, implementation, controlling. W3l GmbH, Witten, Germany (2007).
• 3. Best, E., Weth, M.: Optimising business processes: the practical guide for successful reorganisation. Gabler | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden, Germany (2007).
• 4. Colwell, I., Phan, B., Saleem, S., Salay, R., Czarnecki, K.: An Automated Vehicle Safety Concept Based on Runtime Restriction of the Operational Design Domain. In: 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). pp. 1910–1917 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2018.8500530.
• 5. Endsley, M.R.: Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). In: Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference. pp. 789–795 , Dayton, OH, USA (1988). https://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1988.195097.
• 6. Endsley, M.R., Kiris, E.O.: The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation. Hum Factors. 37, 2, 381–394 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779064555.
• 7. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 210: Human centred design for interactive systems. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland (2019).
• 8. Feiser, D.: Development and investigation of a concept to capture work processes. Shaker-Verlag, Aachen, Germany (2015).
• 9. Kim, M., Joung, T.-H., Jeong, B., Park, H.-S.: Autonomous shipping and its impact on regulations, technologies, and industries. null. 4, 2, 17–25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2020.1779427.
• 10. Leittechnik; Regelungstechnik und Steuerungstechnik; Allgemeine Grundbegriffe: DIN 19226-1 - 1994-02 - Beuth.de. Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V., Berlin, Germany (1994).
• 11. Meurn, R.J.: Watchstanding Guide for the Merchant Officer. Schiffer Publishing.
• 12. Object Management Group (OMG): Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). (2013).
• 13. Ørnulf, J.R.: Defining Ship Autonomy by Characteristic Factors. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships. pp. 19–26 , Busan, Korea (2018).
• 14. Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T.B., Wickens, C.D.: A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans. 30, 3, 286–297 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354.
• 15. Porathe, T., Hoem, Å., Rødseth, Ø., Fjørtoft, K., Johnsen, S.O.: At least as safe as manned shipping? Autonomous shipping, safety and “human error.” In: Haugen, S., Barros, A., van Gulijk, C., Kongsvik, T., and Vinnem, J.E. (eds.) Proceedings of ESREL 2018,. pp. 417–425 CRC Press, Trondheim, Norway (2018). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351174664-52.
• 16. Rødseth, Ø.J., Nordahl, H.: Definitions for autonomous merchant ships, https://nfas.autonomous-ship.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/autonom-defs.pdf, last accessed 2021/03/27.
• 17. Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D., Billings, C.E.: Automation Surprices. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors & Ergonomics. Wiley (1997).
• 18. Seppelt, B.D., Victor, T.W.: Potential Solutions to Human Factors Challenges in Road Vehicle Automation. In: Meyer, G. and Beiker, S. (eds.) Road Vehicle Automation 3. pp. 131–148 Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40503-2_11.
• 19. Volz, K., Yang, E., Dudley, R., Lynch, E., Dropps, M., Dorneich, M.C.: An Evaluation of Cognitive Skill Degradation in Information Automation. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 60, 1, 191–195 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213601043.
• 20. Wróbel, K., Gil, M., Chae, C.-J.: On the Influence of Human Factors on Safety of Remotely-Controlled Merchant Vessels. Applied Sciences. 11, 3, (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031145.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).