Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
In the relativistic world of the 21st century, if the Bauhaus would still be upheld as doctrine, we must face the truth: it can hardly be considered a provocation. Rather, we most often find ourselves caught between contradictory wishes to preserve an intact past and to make sense of a resolute avant-gardism. This paper proposes that the Bauhaus, as a discursive knowledge body, be structuralistically analyzed with Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. Our claim is substantiated by: first, that a F oucaultian concept of discourse offers an alternative to the practice of history and theory; second, that the publication of Bauhaus reveals a discursive structure in a F oucaultian sense; third, that discourse-analysis-search-engine can perform the analysis on the Bauhaus corpus, contributing to emergent epistemological positions; fourth, that this revealed structure of discourse could be mapped and re-materialized to invite interferences on today’s territory of Bauhaus Discourse. The research and development process in the accompanying project “Bauhaus Orbits – scenographic apparatus for discourse analysis” (bauhausorbits.de) will be discussed.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
15--28
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 23 poz., rys.
Twórcy
autor
- Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism
- Geschwister-Scholl-Straße 8, D-99423 Weimar
autor
- Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Faculty of Media, Bauhausstraße 11, D-99423 Weimar
autor
- Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Faculty of Media, Bauhausstraße 11, D-99423 Weimar
autor
- Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Faculty of Media, Bauhausstraße 11, D-99423 Weimar
Bibliografia
- 1. Banham R. (2002), Theory and design in the first machine age, Oxford: Butterworth Architecture.
- 2. Bayer H. (1939), Fundamentals of Exhibition Design, “PM Magazine” 1939-12 - 1940-01, Rare Book Division, The New York Public Library, retrieved from http://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/90f27111-9714-4fc1-e040-e00a18064ba4.
- 3. Bernhard P. (2017), Bauhausvorträge: Gastredner am Weimarer Bauhaus 1919-1925, Gebr. Mann, Berlin.
- 4. Borges J. L. & Hurley A. (1999), On Exactitude in Science published in Collected fictions, Penguin Books, New York.
- 5. Buchanan R. (1992), Wicked Problems in Design Thinking, “Design Issues” 8(2), 5-21, DOI:10.2307/1511637.
- 6. Dreyfus H. L., Rabinow P. & Foucault M. (2006), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 2. ed., Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York.
- 7. Fleck L. (1935), Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv, etc. Pl. V. Basel.
- 8. Foucault M. (1972), The archaeology of knowledge and, The discourse on language, Pantheon Books, New York.
- 9. Giedion S. (1948), Mechanization takes command. A contribution to anonymous history, Oxford University Press, New York.
- 10. Gleizes A. (1928), Kubismus, A. Langen, München.
- 11. Gropius W. (1923), Idee und Aufbau des staatlichen Bauhauses Weimar, Bauhausverlag, München.
- 12. Harvey F., Kwan M., & Pavlovskaya M. (2005), Introduction: Critical GIS, “Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization” 40(4), 1-4. DOI:10.3138/04L6-2314-6068-43V6.
- 13. Hays K. M. (2000), Architecture theory since 1968, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. - London.
- 14. Hirst P. (1993), Foucault and Architecture, “AA Files” (26).
- 15. Kitchin R. (2014), Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts, Big Data & Society 1(1), 205395171452848. DOI:10.1177/2053951714528481.
- 16. Klee P. (1953), Pedagogical sketchbook, F.A. Praeger, New York.
- 17. Korzybski A. (1948), Selections from science and sanity; an introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics, The International non-Aristotelian Library Publishing Company, Connecticut.
- 18. Kuhn T. S. (1962), The structure of scientific revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- 19. Latour B. (1993), We have never been modern, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
- 20. Manovich L. (2002), Avant-garde as software, “Artnodes”, (2) DOI:10.7238/a.v0i2.681.
- 21. Moholy-Nagy L. & Hoffman D. M. (1947), The New Vision, fourth revised edition and Abstract of an artist, Wittenborn, Schultz, New York.
- 22. Siegert B. (1996), The Map is the Territory. Radical Philosophy, “A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy” No. 169, September/October 2011, Radical Philosophy Group, London.
- 23. Dezeen & Fairs M. (2014), Critics give verdicts on Rem's Venice Architecture Biennale "without any architecture in sight", June 2, retrieved from www.dezeen.com/2014/06/05/critics-give-verdicts-onrems-biennale-without-any-architecture-in-sight/ Radical Statistics Group, (n.d.), retrieved from http://www.radstats.org.uk/.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-aeb5fb59-4f9b-42a5-b63e-60f467de1bc7