PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Experimental structure of discourse: mapping the discourse formations of Bauhaus ideals

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In the relativistic world of the 21st century, if the Bauhaus would still be upheld as doctrine, we must face the truth: it can hardly be considered a provocation. Rather, we most often find ourselves caught between contradictory wishes to preserve an intact past and to make sense of a resolute avant-gardism. This paper proposes that the Bauhaus, as a discursive knowledge body, be structuralistically analyzed with Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. Our claim is substantiated by: first, that a F oucaultian concept of discourse offers an alternative to the practice of history and theory; second, that the publication of Bauhaus reveals a discursive structure in a F oucaultian sense; third, that discourse-analysis-search-engine can perform the analysis on the Bauhaus corpus, contributing to emergent epistemological positions; fourth, that this revealed structure of discourse could be mapped and re-materialized to invite interferences on today’s territory of Bauhaus Discourse. The research and development process in the accompanying project “Bauhaus Orbits – scenographic apparatus for discourse analysis” (bauhausorbits.de) will be discussed.
Rocznik
Strony
15--28
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 23 poz., rys.
Twórcy
autor
  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism
  • Geschwister-Scholl-Straße 8, D-99423 Weimar
  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Faculty of Media, Bauhausstraße 11, D-99423 Weimar
  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Faculty of Media, Bauhausstraße 11, D-99423 Weimar
autor
  • Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, Faculty of Media, Bauhausstraße 11, D-99423 Weimar
Bibliografia
  • 1. Banham R. (2002), Theory and design in the first machine age, Oxford: Butterworth Architecture.
  • 2. Bayer H. (1939), Fundamentals of Exhibition Design, “PM Magazine” 1939-12 - 1940-01, Rare Book Division, The New York Public Library, retrieved from http://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/90f27111-9714-4fc1-e040-e00a18064ba4.
  • 3. Bernhard P. (2017), Bauhausvorträge: Gastredner am Weimarer Bauhaus 1919-1925, Gebr. Mann, Berlin.
  • 4. Borges J. L. & Hurley A. (1999), On Exactitude in Science published in Collected fictions, Penguin Books, New York.
  • 5. Buchanan R. (1992), Wicked Problems in Design Thinking, “Design Issues” 8(2), 5-21, DOI:10.2307/1511637.
  • 6. Dreyfus H. L., Rabinow P. & Foucault M. (2006), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics, 2. ed., Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York.
  • 7. Fleck L. (1935), Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv, etc. Pl. V. Basel.
  • 8. Foucault M. (1972), The archaeology of knowledge and, The discourse on language, Pantheon Books, New York.
  • 9. Giedion S. (1948), Mechanization takes command. A contribution to anonymous history, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • 10. Gleizes A. (1928), Kubismus, A. Langen, München.
  • 11. Gropius W. (1923), Idee und Aufbau des staatlichen Bauhauses Weimar, Bauhausverlag, München.
  • 12. Harvey F., Kwan M., & Pavlovskaya M. (2005), Introduction: Critical GIS, “Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization” 40(4), 1-4. DOI:10.3138/04L6-2314-6068-43V6.
  • 13. Hays K. M. (2000), Architecture theory since 1968, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. - London.
  • 14. Hirst P. (1993), Foucault and Architecture, “AA Files” (26).
  • 15. Kitchin R. (2014), Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts, Big Data & Society 1(1), 205395171452848. DOI:10.1177/2053951714528481.
  • 16. Klee P. (1953), Pedagogical sketchbook, F.A. Praeger, New York.
  • 17. Korzybski A. (1948), Selections from science and sanity; an introduction to non-Aristotelian systems and general semantics, The International non-Aristotelian Library Publishing Company, Connecticut.
  • 18. Kuhn T. S. (1962), The structure of scientific revolutions, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • 19. Latour B. (1993), We have never been modern, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
  • 20. Manovich L. (2002), Avant-garde as software, “Artnodes”, (2) DOI:10.7238/a.v0i2.681.
  • 21. Moholy-Nagy L. & Hoffman D. M. (1947), The New Vision, fourth revised edition and Abstract of an artist, Wittenborn, Schultz, New York.
  • 22. Siegert B. (1996), The Map is the Territory. Radical Philosophy, “A Journal of Socialist and Feminist Philosophy” No. 169, September/October 2011, Radical Philosophy Group, London.
  • 23. Dezeen & Fairs M. (2014), Critics give verdicts on Rem's Venice Architecture Biennale "without any architecture in sight", June 2, retrieved from www.dezeen.com/2014/06/05/critics-give-verdicts-onrems-biennale-without-any-architecture-in-sight/ Radical Statistics Group, (n.d.), retrieved from http://www.radstats.org.uk/.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-aeb5fb59-4f9b-42a5-b63e-60f467de1bc7
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.