Durability assessment of railway car axles taking into account the character of the stress spectrum

• Autorzy: Kibakov Oleksandr , Khomiak Yuriy , Jaremenko Volodymyr , Zheglova Victoria

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29354/diag/192026

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In many countries, railway cars with axles that have operated for over 50 years are still in use, which significantly exceeds their normative service life. This can be explained by the fact that design calculations are based on overestimated loads, as evidenced by published information on diagnostics of railway axles, which is performed under real operating conditions. In this work proposes a method for calculating the durability of axles of railway cars under real operating conditions, which is based on fatigue tests of samples made of axle material, the statistical theory of similarity of fatigue failure, analysis of the stress state and known models of fatigue curves. The calculations performed showed that, under real operating conditions, the durability of the axles exceeds N=1010 cycles, which indicates their operation in the field of gigacycle fatigue. These values N correspond to a service life of over 30 years. Recommendations are given for assessing the durability of railway axles, taking into account actual operating conditions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

fatigue curve models; similarity theory of fatigue failure; stress spectrum of axles

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Diagnostyki Technicznej
• Czasopismo: Diagnostyka
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 25, No. 3
• Strony: art. no. 2024311
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kibakov Oleksandr

• Department of Hoisting and Transport Machines and Engineering of Port Technological Equipment, Odesa National Maritime University, 34 Mechnikov St., 65029, Odesa, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8339-345X

autor

Khomiak Yuriy

• Department of Hoisting and Transport Machines and Engineering of Port Technological Equipment, Odesa National Maritime University, 34 Mechnikov St., 65029, Odesa, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0093-8405

autor

Jaremenko Volodymyr

• Department of Hoisting and Transport Machines and Engineering of Port Technological Equipment, Odesa National Maritime University, 34 Mechnikov St., 65029, Odesa, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4797-7818

autor

Zheglova Victoria

• Department of Metal-Cutting Machine Tools, Metrology and Certification, Odesa Polytechnic National University, 1 Shevchenko Ave. 65044, Odesa, Ukraine

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8790-3277

Bibliografia

• 1. Dikmen F, Bayraktar M, Guclu R. Railway Axle Analyses: Fatigue Damage and Life Analysis of Rail Vehicle Axle. Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering 2012; 58(9): 545-52. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2011.206.
• 2. Klenam DEP, Chown LH, Papo MJ, Cornish LA. Steels for rail axles - an overview. Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences 2024; 49(2): 163-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2022.2137462.
• 3. Beretta S, Regazzi D. Probabilistic fatigue assessment for railway axles and derivation of a simple format for damage calculations. International Journal of Fatigue 2016; 86: 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.08.010.
• 4. Mallor C, Calvo S, Núñez JL, Rodríguez-Barrachina R, Landaberea A. On the use of probabilistic fatigue life estimation in defining inspection intervals for railway axles. Procedia Structural Integrity 2021; 33: 391-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2021.10.047.
• 5. Maglio M, Kabo E, Ekberg A. Railway wheelset fatigue life estimation based on field tests. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures 2022; 45(9): 2443-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/ffe.13756.
• 6. Giannella V, Sepe R, De Michele G, Esposito R. Deterministic fatigue crack-growth simulations for a railway axle by Dual Boundary Element Method. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2021; 1038(1): 012080. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1038/1/012080.
• 7. Khomyak Y, Kibakov O, Medvedev S, Nikolenko I, Zheglovа V. The lifetime forecasting of machine elements by fatigue strength criterion. Diagnostyka 2021; 22(4): 39-49. https://doi.org/10.29354/diag/143315.
• 8. BS EN 13103-1:2017+A1:2022 Railway applications. Wheelsets and bogies Design method for axles with external journals. https://standardsdevelopment.bsigroup.com/projects/ 2019-00457#/section.
• 9. Yasniy O, Lapusta Y, Pyndus Y, Sorochak A, Yasniy V. Assessment of lifetime of railway axle. International Journal of Fatigue 2013; 50: 40-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.04.008.
• 10. Kibakov O, Khomyak Y, Medvedev S, Nikolenko I, Zheglovа V. Endurance limit of the axial-piston hydraulic machine cylinder block. Diagnostyka 2020; 21(1): 71-9. https://doi.org/10.29354/diag/116691.
• 11. Bobyr DV, Kapitsa MI, Serdiuk VN. Theory of locomotive traction. Traction calculations for industrial railway transport: manual. Ukraine State University of Science and Technologies, Educational and Scientific Institute Dnipro Institute of Infrastructure and Transport 2022; 113. https://crust.ust.edu.ua/items/368f00fc-225a-4aa2- 9c2f-f090e16dbdf1.
• 12. Kogaev VP, Makhutov NA, Gusenkov AP. Calculations of machine elements and structures for strength and durability: Handbook (in Russian), Mashinostroyeniye Publ 1985; 224. https://www.chipmaker.ru/files/file/8276/.
• 13. Zerbst U, Beretta S, Köhler G, Lawton A, Vormwald M, Beier HTh, et al. Safe life and damage tolerance aspects of railway axles – A review. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 2013; 98: 214-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.09.029.
• 14. Fuchs D, Schurer S, Tobie T, Stahl K. On the determination of the bending fatigue strength in and above the very high cycle fatigue regime of shotpeened gears. Forschung im Ingenieurwesen 2022; 86(1): 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10010-021- 00499-2.
• 15. Pedersen MM. Introduction to Metal Fatigue - Concepts and Engineering Approaches. 2018. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25216.28163.
• 16. Klemenc J, Podgornik B. An Improved Model for Predicting the Scattered S-N Curves. Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering 2019: 265-75. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2018.5918.
• 17. Wang Q, Khan MK, Bathias C. Current understanding of ultra-high cycle fatigue. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters 2012; 2(3): 031002. https://doi.org/10.1063/2.1203102.
• 18. Paolino DS, Tridello A, Geng HS, Chiandussi G, Rossetto M. Duplex S-N fatigue curves: statistical distribution of the transition fatigue life. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 2014; 8(30): 417-23. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.30.50.
• 19. Zhang J, Li S, Yang Z, Li G, Hui W, Weng Y. Influence of inclusion size on fatigue behavior of high strength steels in the gigacycle fatigue regime. International Journal of Fatigue 2007; 29(4): 765-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.06.004.
• 20. Palin-Luc T, Jeddi D. The gigacycle fatigue strength of steels: a review of structural and operating factors. Procedia Structural Integrity 2018; 13: 1545-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2018.12.316.
• 21. Bižić M, Petrović D. Аnalytical calculation of strength of freight wagon axle in accordance with european standards. Mechanics Transport Communications 2021; 19(3): 2113-7. https://mtcaj.com/library/2113_EN.pdf.
• 22. Stojanovic Z, Matijevic B, Stanisavlev S, Erik S. Investigation on the mechanisms of destruction of railway axles. Protection of Materials 2021; 62(1): 51-62. https://doi.org/10.5937/zasmat2101051S.
• 23. Railway Investigation Report. Main-track Train Derailment. Canadian Pacific. Train No. 823-957. Mile 41.30. Canadian National Yale Subdivision, British Columbia. 2004;12. https://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/rapportsreports/rail/2004/r04v0173/r04v0173.pdf.
• 24. Gareau C. Broken axle caused New Hazelton train derailment: TSB / Victoria News, 2019. https://www.vicnews.com/news/broken-axle-northbc-derailment-could-happen-again-tsb-50810.