Sensor Hop-based Energy Efficient Networking Approach for Routing in Underwater Acoustic Communication

• Autorzy: Kohli S. , Bhattacharya P. P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks are deployed to explore the world under the water, measure different parameters and communicate the data to the surface, in the widespread applications. The main operating technology of these networks is the acoustic communication. The communication among the sensors and finally to the surface station requires a routing protocol. The sensors being battery limited and unfeasible to be replaced under the water requires an energy efficient routing protocol. Clustering imparted in routing is an energy saving technique in sensor networks. The routing may involve single or multi hop communication in the sensor networks. The paper gives a comparative study of the benchmark protocol multi-hop LEACH with the proposed Sensor Hop-based Energy Efficient Networking Approach (SHEENA) for the shallow as well as deep water in three dimensional Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks. The network energy model for the Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks is based among the different acoustic channel characteristics. The proposed approach is found to give better response.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

attenuation; clustering; multi-hop routing; signal-to-noise ratio; transmission loss

• Wydawca: Instytut Łączności - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
• Czasopismo: Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: nr 1
• Strony: 44--49
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 18 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kohli S.

• Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh – 332311, Rajasthan, India

autor

Bhattacharya P. P.

• Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Mody University of Science and Technology, Lakshmangarh – 332311, Rajasthan, India

Bibliografia

• [1] I. F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia, “Underwater acoustic sensor networks: Research challenges”, Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 257–279, 2005.
• [2] S. Kohli and P. P. Bhattacharya, “Characterization of acoustic channel for underwater wireless sensor networks”, in Proc. Ann. IEEE India Conf. INDICON 2015, New Dehli, India, 2015 (doi: 10.1109/ INDICON.2015.7443243).
• [3] M. Ayaz and A. Azween, “Underwater wireless sensor networks: routing issues and future challenges”, in Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Adv. in Mob. Comput. & Multim. MoMM 2009, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2009, pp. 370–375 (doi: 10.1145/1821748.1821819).
• [4] J. Heidemann et al., “Research challenges and applications for underwater sensor networking”, in Proc. IEEE Wirel. Commun. & Netw. Conf. WCNC 2006, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2006, vol. 1, pp. 228-235 (doi: 10.1109/WCNC.2006.1683469).
• [5] I. F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia, “Challenges for effcient communication in underwater acoustic sensor networks”, ACM Sigbed Rev., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 3–8, 2004 (doi. 10.1145/1121776.1121779).
• [6] H. Frey, S. Rührup, and I. Stojmenović, “Routing in wireless sensor networks”, in Guide to Wireless Sensor Networks, S. C. Misra, I. Woungang, and S. Misra, Eds. London: Springer, 2009, pp. 81–111.
• [7] C. Schurger and M. B. Srivastava, “Energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks”, in Proc. Military Commun. Conf. MILCOM 2001. Communications for Network-Centric Operations: Creating the Information Force, McLean, VA, USA, 2001, vol. 1 (doi: 10.1109/MILICOM.2001.985819).
• [8] B. Mamalis et al., “Clustering in wireless sensor networks”, in RFID and Sensor Networks: Architectures, Protocols, Security and Integrations, Y. Zhang, L. T. Yang, J. Chen, Eds. CRC Press, 2009, pp. 324–353.
• [9] M. Arioua et al., “Multi-hop cluster based routing approach for wireless sensor networks”, Procedia Computer Science, vol. 83, pp. 584–591, 2016 (doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.277).
• [10] I. F. Akyildiz et al., “Wireless sensor networks: A survey”, Computer Networks, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 393–422, 2002.
• [11] F. Xiangning and S. Yulin, “Improvement on LEACH protocol of wireless sensor network”, in Proc. Int. Conf. on Sensor Technol. & Appl. SensorComm 2007, Valencia, Spain, 2007, pp. 260–264 (doi: 10.1109/SENSORCOMM.2007.60).
• [12] T. V. Padmavathy, V. Gayathri, V. Indumathi, and G. Karthika, “Network lifetime extension based on network coding technique in underwater acoustic sensor networks”, Int. J. of Distrib. and Parallel Syst., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 85–100, 2012 (doi: 10.5121/ijdps.2012.3309).
• [13] M. Felamban, B. Shihada, and K. Jamshaid, “Optimal node placement in underwater wireless sensor networks”, in Proc. 27th IEEE Int. Conf. on Adv. Inform. Netw. & Appl. AINA 2013, Barcelona, Spain, 2013, pp. 492–499 (doi: 101109/AINA.2013.40).
• [14] M. C. Domingo and R. Prior, “Energy analysis of routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks”, Computer Commun., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1227–1238, 2008 (doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2007.11.005).
• [15] J. A. L. Sirvent, “Realistic acoustic prediction models to efficiently design higher layer protocols in underwater wireless sensor networks”, Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Miguel Hern´andez De Elche, 2012.
• [16] W. H. Thorp, “Analytic description of the low-frequency attenuation coefficient”, The J. of the Acoust. Soc. of America, vol. 42, no. 1, p. 270, 1967 (doi: 10.1121/1.1910566).
• [17] J. Llor, E. Torres, P. Garrido, and M. P. Malumbres, “Analyzing the behavior of acoustic link models in underwater wireless sensor networks”, in Proc. 4th ACM Worksh. on Perform. Monit. & Measur. of Heterogen. Wirel. and Wired Netw. PM2HW2N ’09, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, 2009, pp. 9–16 (doi: 10.1145/1641913.1641915).
• [18] D. J. Higham and N. J. Higham, MATLAB Guide. Siam, 2005.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).