The dynamics of the distribution of co-authors

• Autorzy: Wójtowicz T. , Rzecki K. , Pławiak P. , Niedźwiedzki M. , Sośnicki T. , Wojtoń T. , Smelcerz K. , Tabor Z.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.4467/2353737XCT.15.116.4153

Warianty tytułu

PL

Dynamika dystrybucji współautorów

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the present paper, the case of a database of scientific articles is described. There can be observed the quantitative effects of the increasing strength of cooperation between scholars. It is manifested in time-related features changes of the numbers distribution of a single co-authors’ article. The distribution of the number of co-authors of an article recorded in the database evolves with time from a profile with no more than one author to a profile with several authors. A social dilemma model is proposed to explain the dynamics of changes in the distribution of the number of co-authors. The most successful strategy of the three considered alternative strategies of cooperation is selected.

PL

W niniejszym artykule, na podstawie bazy artykułów naukowych, opisano ilościowy efekt wzrostu współpracy uczonych, która objawia się zmianami cech rozkładu liczby współautorów artykułu w czasie. Rozkład liczby współautorów artykułu dostępnego w bazie danych zmienia się w czasie z maksimum dla jednego autora do maksimum kilku autorów. Do wyjaśnienia dynamiki zmian rozkładu liczby współautorów zaproponowano model dylematu społecznego. Spośród trzech została wybrana jedna strategia współpracy odnosząca największe sukcesy.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cooperation; PubMed; authorship; social dilemma

PL

współpraca; PubMed; autorstwo; dylemat społeczny

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej im. Tadeusza Kościuszki
• Czasopismo: Czasopismo Techniczne. Nauki Podstawowe
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Y. 112, iss. 1-NP
• Strony: 85--103
• Opis fizyczny: Bobliogr. 38 poz., wykr., wz.

Twórcy

autor

Wójtowicz T.

• Institute of Computer Science and Computer Mathematics, Jagiellonian University

autor

Rzecki K.

• Institute of Telecomputing, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Computer Science, Cracow University of Technology

autor

Pławiak P.

• Institute of Telecomputing, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Computer Science, Cracow University of Technology
• Department of Automatics and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Automatics, Computer Science and Biomedical Engineering, AGH University of Science and Technology

autor

Niedźwiedzki M.

• Institute of Telecomputing, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Computer Science, Cracow University of Technology

autor

Sośnicki T.

• Institute of Telecomputing, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Computer Science, Cracow University of Technology

autor

Wojtoń T.

• Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences

autor

Smelcerz K.

• Institute of Telecomputing, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Computer Science, Cracow University of Technology

autor

Tabor Z.

• Institute of Telecomputing, Faculty of Physics, Mathematics and Computer Science, Cracow University of Technology

Bibliografia

• [1] Axelrod R., Hamilton W., The evolution of cooperation, Science 211, 1981, 1390-1396.
• [2] Sugden R., The Economics of Rights, Cooperation, and Welfare, Blackwell, Oxford, England 1986.
• [3] Skyrms B., Stag-Hunt Game and the Evolution of Social Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2004.
• [4] Hardin G., The tragedy of the commons, Science 162, 1968, 1243-1248.
• [5] Hamilton W., The genetical evolution of social behaviour, Journal of Theoretical Biology 7 (1), 1964, 1-52, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022519364900384.
• [6] Taylor P.D., Altruism in viscous populations an inclusive fitness model, Evol. Ecol. 6, 1992, 352-356.
• [7] Queller D.C., Quantitative genetics, inclusive fitness, and group selection, Am. Nat. 139, 1992, 540-558.
• [8] Frank S.A., Foundations of Social Evolution, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton 1998.
• [9] West S.A., Pen I., Griffin A.S., Cooperation and competition between relatives, Science 296, 2002, 72-75.
• [10] Sethi R., Somanathan E., Understanding reciprocity, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 50 (1), 2003, 1-27, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016726810200032X.
• [11] Carpenter J.P., Trust and reciprocity: Interdisciplinary lessons from experimental research: Elinor Ostrom, James Walker (eds.); Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 2003, xiii and 409 pages, index, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 55 (1), 2004, 93-99, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268104000319.
• [12] Trivers R., The evolution of reciprocal altruism, Q. Rev. Biol., 46, 1971, 35-57.
• [13] Axelrod R., The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York 1984.
• [14] Charness G., Haruvy E., Sonsino D., Social distance and reciprocity: An internet experiment, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63 (1), 2007, 88-103. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2005.04.021. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268106000564.
• [15] Borcherding T.E., Filson D., Group consumption, free-riding, and informal reciprocity agreements, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 47 (3), 2002, 237-257, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268101002062.
• [16] Neugebauer T., Poulsen A., Schram A., Fairness and reciprocity in the hawkdove game, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 66 (2), 2008, 243-250, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268106002290.
• [17] Abbink K., Irlenbusch B., Renner E., The moonlighting game: An experimental study on reciprocity and retribution, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 42 (2), 2000, 265-277, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268100000895.
• [18] Cagno D.D., Sciubba E., Trust, trustworthiness and social networks: Playing a trust game when networks are formed in the lab, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 75 (2), 2010, 156-167, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268110000739.
• [19] Annen K., Social capital, inclusive networks, and economic performance, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 50 (4), 2003, 449-463, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268102000355.
• [20] van den Bergh J.C., Gowdy J.M., A group selection perspective on economic behavior, institutions and organizations, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72 (1), 2009, 1-20, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268109001255.
• [21] Henrich J., Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53 (1), 2004, 3-35, evolution and Altruism, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268103000945.
• [22] Outkin A.V., Cooperation and local interactions in the prisoners’ dilemma game, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52 (4), 2003, 481-503, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268102001555.
• [23] Dreber A., Fudenberg D., Rand D.G., Who cooperates in repeated games: The role of altruism, inequity aversion, and demographics, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 98 (0), 2014, 41-55, ttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268113003053.
• [24] Mullins D.A., Whitehouse H., Atkinson Q.D., The role of writing and recordkeeping in the cultural evolution of human cooperation, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90, Supplement (0), 2013, S141-S151, evolution as a General Theoretical Framework for Economics and Public Policy, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268112002764.
• [25] Janssen M.A., Rollins N.D., Evolution of cooperation in asymmetric commons dilemmas, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81 (1), 2012, 220-229, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268111002599.
• [26] Packer C., Scheel D., Pusey A.E., Why lions form groups: Food is not enough, The American Naturalist 136, 1990, 1-19.
• [27] Baird R.W., Dill L.M., Ecological and social determinants of group size in transient killer whales, Behavioral Ecology 7, 1996, 408-416.
• [28] Yip E., Powers K.S., Aviles L., Cooperative capture of large prey solves scaling challenge faced by spider societies, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2008, 11818-11822.
• [29] Creel S., Creel N.M., Communal hunting and pack size in african wild dogs, Lycaon pictus. Anim. Behav. 50, 1995, 1325-1339.
• [30] Jones G., Are smarter groups more cooperative? evidence from prisoner’s dilemma experiments, 1959‒2003, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68 (3‒4), 2008, 489-497, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268108001315.
• [31] Archetti M., The volunteer’s dilemma and the optimal size of a social group, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 261 (3), 2009, 475-480, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022519309003890.
• [32] Hauert C., Wakano J., Doebeli M., Ecological public goods games: Cooperation and bifurcation, Theor Pop Biol., 73, 2008, 257-263.
• [33] Charness G., Yang C.-L., Starting small toward voluntary formation of efficient large groups in public goods provision, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 102 (0), 2014, 119-132, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268114000754.
• [34] Perc M., Szolnoki A., Coevolutionary games-a mini review, BioSystems, 99, 2010, 109-125.
• [35] Siwik L., Włodarczyk K., Kluczny M., Staged event-driven architecture as a micro-architecture of distributed and pluginable crawling platform, Computer Science, 14 (4), 2013, 645-665.
• [36] Niedzwiecki M., Cetnarowicz K., Rzecki K., Using the evaluation nets modeling tool concept as an rnhancement of the petri net tool, [in:] Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS), 2013 Federated Conference on, 2013, 1007-1012.
• [37] Tadeusiewicz R., Horzyk A., Man-machine interactions improvement by means of automatic human personality identification, [in:] Saeed K., Snasel V., Computer information systems and industrial management, lecture notes in computer science, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 8838, 2014, 278-289.
• [38] Van Valen L., A new evolutionary law, Evol. Theory, 1, 1973, 1-30.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.