Safety Management System in aviation: comparative analysis of safety management system approaches in v4 countries

• Autorzy: Kešeľová Michaela , Blišťanová Monika , Hanák Peter , Brůnová Ľubomíra

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/mspe-2021-0026

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article aims to support the Safety Management System's implementation in the Visegrad Four (V4) countries by introducing supporting documentation at the national level or national legislation. The research subjects are the V4 countries (Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia), where 39 air carriers operate. Safety management in today's world is already necessary, yet introducing a Safety Management System (SMS) is voluntary in many areas, including some transport modes. In air transport, it is mandatory, and the general principles and guidelines of this system are set out in the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), which has issued several regulations and recommendations. The lists of ICAO standards and essential translations can be considered a minimum, which is also approached by different authorities. The article points out the primary differences in SMS in individual V4 countries and presents which country provides the strongest support in implementing this system.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ICAO; regulations and recommendations; Safety Management System

• Wydawca: STE GROUP
• Czasopismo: Management Systems in Production Engineering
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: nr 3 (29)
• Strony: 208--214
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kešeľová Michaela

• Technical University of Košice Faculty of Aeronautics Deparment of Air Transport Management Rampova 7, 041 21 Kosice, Slovakia

autor

Blišťanová Monika

• Technical University of Košice Faculty of Aeronautics Deparment of Air Transport Management Rampova 7, 041 21 Kosice, Slovakia

autor

Hanák Peter

• Technical University of Košice Faculty of Aeronautics Deparment of Air Transport Management Rampova 7, 041 21 Kosice, Slovakia

autor

Brůnová Ľubomíra

• Technical University of Košice Faculty of Aeronautics Deparment of Air Transport Management Rampova 7, 041 21 Kosice, Slovakia

Bibliografia

• [1] International Air Transport Association. 20 Year Passenger Forecast. International Air Transport Association: Montreal, Canada, 2020.
• [2] Batuwangala, Eranga; Silva, Jose; Wild, Graham. “The regulatory framework for safety management systems in airworthiness organisations.” Aerospace. Vol. 5, No. 4, Aug. 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace5040117
• [3] Yeun, R., Bates, P., Murray, P. „Aviation safety management systems.“ World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, Feb. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1504/WRITR.2014.067234
• [4] Jharko, E., Sakrutina, E. „Towards the Problem of Creating a Safety Management System in the Transportation Area.“ FAC PapersOnLine, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 15610-15615, Jul. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1895
• [5] International Civil Aviation Organization. Doc 9859 – Safety Management Manual (DRAFT), 4th ed. International Civil Aviation Organization: Montreal, Canada, 2017.
• [6] Hollnagel, Erik. Safety-I and safety-II: the past and future of safety management. (1st edition). CRC Press. 2018.
• [7] Stolzer, A.J. Mcd Halford, MJJ Goglia. Safety Management Systems in Aviation. Routledge: Abingdon, UK, 2017.
• [8] Waddington, J.G., Lafortune, J.F., Duffey, R. “Institutional failure: are safety management systems the answer?” The 30th Annual Canadian Nuclear Society Conference and 33rd CNS/CNA Student Conference, Calgary, Alberta. 2009.
• [9] Thomas, M.J. “A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Safety Management Systems (AR-2011-148)”. Retrieved from Australian Transport Safety Bureau. Canberra, Australia: Australian Transport Safety Bureau, 2012.
• [10] Transport Canada. Guidance on Safety Management Systems Development. Transport Canada: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2008.
• [11] Civil Aviation Safety Authority Australia. Safety Management Systems for Regular Public Transport Operations CAAP SMS-01 v1.1. Civil Aviation Safety Authority Australia: Woden, Australian Capital Territory, 2018.
• [12] Federal Aviation Administration. Safety Management Systems – ORDER 8000.369C. Federal Aviation Administration: Washington, DC, 2020.
• [13] UK Civil Aviation Authority. Safety Management System (SMS) guidance for organisations – CAP 795. UK Civil Aviation Authority: Kingsway, London, 2015.
• [14] Ignac-Nowicka, Jolanta. “Application of the FTA and ETA method for gas hazard identification for the performance of safety systems in the industrial department.” Management Systems in Production Engineering. Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 23-26. 2018, DOI: 10.2478/mspe-2018-0003.
• [15] Kysor, H.D. “Safety management system. Part I: the design of a system.” National Safety News, Vol. 108, pp. 98-102, 1973.
• [16] Hsu, Y.L., Li, W.C., Chen, K.W. “Structuring critical success factors of airline safety management system using a hybrid model.” Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 222-235, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2009.08.005
• [17] COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) NO. 965/2012. European Union Aviation Safety Agency Standard. 2012.
• [18] International Civil Aviation Organisation. Annex 19 – Safety Management, 1st ed.; International Civil Aviation Organization: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2013.
• [19] Roelem, A., L., C., Klompstra, M.B. „The challenges in defining aviation safety performance indicators.“ PSAM 11 & ESREL 2012, 25-29 June 2012, Helsinki, Finland
• [20] Transport CANADA. Advisory Circular (AC) No. 107-001 – Guidance on Safety Management Systems Development. Transport Canada: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2008.
• [21] Transport CANADA. Advisory Circular (AC) No. 107-002 – Safety Management System Development Guide for Smaller Aviation Organizations. Transport Canada: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2016.
• [22] Urząd Lotnictwa Cywilnego. Załącznik 19. Urząd Lotnictwa Cywilnego: Waszawa, Polska, 2016
• [23] Ministerstvo dopravy České republiky. L 19 Řízení bezpečnosti. Ministerstvo dopravy České republiky: Praha, Česko. 2013.
• [24] Úřad pro civilní letectví. Směrnice CAA-FOD-01/2013. Poradní materiál k požadavku oro.gen.200 systém řízení. Úřad pro civilní letectví: Praha, Česká republika. 2013.
• [25] Ministerstvo dopravy a výstavby Slovenskej republiky. L 19 Systém riadenia bezpečnosti. Ministerstvo dopravy a výstavby Slovenskej republiky: Bratislava, Slovensko. 2017.
• [26] Hollnagel, Erik. “Is safety a subject for science?” Safety science. Vol. 67, pp. 21-24, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.025.
• [27] Broadberry, Stephen; Klein, Alexander. „Aggregate and Per capita GDP in Europe, 1870-2000: Continental, Regional and National data with changing boundaries. 2011.
• [28] Baryshnikova, N., Kiriliuk, O., Klimecka-Tatar, D. "Enterprises’ strategies transformation in the real sector of the economy in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic", Production Engineering Archives, vol. 27, no. 1, 2021, pp. 8- 15. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2021.27.2
• [29] Drljača, M., Petar, S., Raad, M., Štimac, I. "The role and position of Airport City in the Supply Chain", Production Engineering Archives, vol. 26, no. 3, 2020, pp. 104-109. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2020.26.21
• [30] Bednarova, L., Chovancova, J., Pacana, A., Ulewicz, R. “The analysis of success factors in terms of adaptation of expatriates to work in international organizations”, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 17(1), 2018, pp. 59-66.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).