Modeling of the strong ground motion of 25th April 2015 Nepal earthquake using modified semi-empirical technique

Lal, S.; Joshi, A.; Sandeep; Tomer, M.; Kumar, P.; Kuo, C.-H.; Lin, C.-M.; Wen, K.-L.; Sharma, M. L.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Modeling of the strong ground motion of 25th April 2015 Nepal earthquake using modified semi-empirical technique

Autorzy

Lal S. , Joshi A. , Sandeep , Tomer M. , Kumar P. , Kuo C.-H. , Lin C.-M. , Wen K.-L. , Sharma M. L.

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://www.springer.com/journal/11600

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

On 25th April, 2015 a hazardous earthquake of moment magnitude 7.9 occurred in Nepal. Accelerographs were used to record the Nepal earthquake which is installed in the Kumaon region in the Himalayan state of Uttrakhand. The distance of the recorded stations in the Kumaon region from the epicenter of the earthquake is about 420–515 km. Modified semiempirical technique of modeling finite faults has been used in this paper to simulate strong earthquake at these stations. Source parameters of the Nepal aftershock have been also calculated using the Brune model in the present study which are used in the modeling of the Nepal main shock. The obtained value of the seismic moment and stress drop is 8.26 9 1025 dyn cm and 10.48 bar, respectively, for the aftershock from the Brune model .The simulated earthquake time series were compared with the observed records of the earthquake. The comparison of full waveform and its response spectra has been made to finalize the rupture parameters and its location. The rupture of the earthquake was propagated in the NE–SW direction from the hypocenter with the rupture velocity 3.0 km/s from a distance of 80 km from Kathmandu in NW direction at a depth of 12 km as per compared results.

Słowa kluczowe

response spectra modeling strong motion himalayan seismicity displacement spectra site amplification

spektra odpowiedzi wzmocnienie miejsca modelowanie silny ruch sejsmiczność himalajska widma przesunięcia

Wydawca

Instytut Geofizyki PAN
Springer

Czasopismo

Acta Geophysica

Rocznik

2018

Tom

Vol. 66, no. 4

Strony

461--477

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 59 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Lal S.

sohangeokuk@gmail.com

Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India

autor

Joshi A.

Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India

autor

Sandeep

Department of Geophysics, Institute of Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India

autor

Tomer M.

Geological Survey of India, Hyderabad, India

autor

Kumar P.

Wadia Institute of Himalayan Geology, Dehradun, India

autor

Kuo C.-H.

National Centre for Research on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan

autor

Lin C.-M.

Department of Earth Sciences, National Central University, Chungli, Taiwan

autor

Wen K.-L.

Department of Earthquake Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India

autor

Sharma M. L.

Department of Earthquake Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India

Bibliografia

1. Aki K (1967) Scaling law of seismic spectrums. J Geophys Res 72:1217–1231
2. Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1995) Ground motion relations for Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:17–30
3. Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1998) Evaluation of models for earthquakes source spectra in Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:917–934
4. Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2006) Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for Eastern North America. Bull Seism Soc Am 96(6):2181–2205
5. Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (1997) Modeling finite-fault radiation from the omega-n spectrum. Bull Seismol Soc Am 87:67–84
6. Beresnev IA, Atkinson GM (1999) Generic finite-fault model for ground-motion prediction in eastern North America. Bull Seism Soc Am 89:608–625
7. Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:1865–1894
8. Boore DM, Bommer JJ (2005) Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 25:93–115
9. Boore DM, Joyner WB (1991) Estimation of ground motion at deep soil sites Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 81:2167–2185
10. Brune JN (1970) Tectonic stress and spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75:4997–5009
11. CEDIM Report 3: Nepal Earthquakes (2015). CEDIM forensic disaster analysis group, CATDAT and Earthquake-Report.com
12. Fan Wenyuan, Shearer Peter M (2015) Detailed rupture imaging of the 25 April 2015 Nepal earthquake using teleseismic P waves. Geophys Res Lett 42:5744–5752
13. Frankel A (1991) High–frequency spectral falloff of earthquakes, fractal dimension of complex rupture, b value, and scaling of strength on faults. J Geophys Res 96:6291–6302
14. Fukuyama E, Irikura K (1986) Rupture process of the 1983 Japan sea (Akita-Oki) earthquake using a waveform inversion method. Bull Seism Soc Am 76:1623–1640
15. Haddon RAW (1996) Use of empirical green’s functions, spectral ratios, and kinematic source models for simulating ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:597–615
16. Hadley DM, Helmberger DV, Orcutt JA (1982) Peak acceleration scaling studies. Bull Seism Soc Am 72:959–979
17. Hanks TC, McGuire RK (1981) The character of high frequency ground motion. Bull Seism Soc Am 71:2071–2095
18. Hartzell SH (1978) Earthquake aftershocks as Green’s functions. Geophys Res Let 5:1–4
19. Hartzell SH (1982) Simulation of ground accelerations for May 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California earthquakes. Bull Seism Soc Am 72:2381–2387
20. Heaton TH, Hartzell SH (1989) Estimation of strong ground motions from hypothetical earthquakes on the Cascadia subduction zone, Pacific Northwest. Pure Appl Geophys 129:131–201
21. Housner GW, Jennings PC (1964) Generation of artificial earthquakes. Proc ASCE 90:113–150
22. Houston H, Kanamori H (1984) The effect of asperities on short period seismic radiation with application on rupture process and strong motion. Bull Seism Soc Am 76:19–42
23. Hutchings L (1985) Modelling earthquakes with empirical Green’s functions (abs). Earthquake Notes 56:14
24. Imagawa K, Mikami N, Mikumo T (1984) Analytical and semi empirical synthesis of near-field seismic waveforms for investigating the rupture mechanism of major earthquakes. J Physics of Earth 32:317–338
25. Irikura K (1983) Semi empirical estimation of strong ground motion during large earthquakes. Bull Dis Prevent Res Inst 33:63–104
26. Irikura K, Kamae K (1994) Estimation of strong ground motion in broad–frequency band based on a seismic source scaling model and an Empirical Green’s function technique. Ann Geofis XXXVII 6:1721–1743
27. Irikura K, Kagawa T, Sekiguchi H (1997) Revision of the empirical Green’s function method by Irikura 1986. Programme and abstracts. Seismol Soc Jpn 2:B25
28. Joshi A (2004) A simplified technique for simulating wide band strong ground motion for two recent Himalaya earthquakes. Pure Appl Geophys 161:1777–1805
29. Joshi A, Midorikawa S (2004) A simplified method for simulation of strong ground motion using rupture model of the earthquake source. J Seismol 8:467–484
30. Joshi A, Patel RC (1997) Modelling of active lineaments for predicting a possible earthquake scenario around Dehradun, Garhwal Himalaya, India. Tectonophysics 283:289–310
31. Joshi A, Sandeep, Kamal (2014) Modelling of strong motion generation areas of the 2011 Tohoku, Japan earthquake using modified semi empirical technique. Nat Hazards 71:587–609
32. Joshi A, Kumar B, Sinvhal A, Sinvhal H (1999) Generation of synthetic accelerograms by modelling of rupture plane. J earthq Technol 36:43–60
33. Joshi A, Singh S, Giroti K (2001) The Simulation of ground motions using envelope summations. Pure Appl Geophys 158:877–901
34. Joshi A, Kumari P, Sharma ML, Ghosh AK, Agarwal MK, Ravikiran A (2012a) A strong motion model of the 2004 great Sumatra earthquake: simulation using a modified semi empirical method. J Earthq Tsunami 6:1–29
35. Joshi A, Kumari P, Singh S, Sharma ML (2012b) Near–field and far–field simulation of accelerograms of Sikkim earthquake of September 18, 2011 using modified semi empirical approach. Nat Hazards 64:1029–1054
36. Joshi A, Kumar P, Mohanty M, Bansal AR, Dimri VP, Chadha RK (2012c) Determination of Qβ(f) in different parts of Kumaon Himalaya from the inversion of spectral acceleration data. Pure Appl Geophys 169:1821–1845
37. Joshi A, Tomer Monu, Lal Sohan, Chopra Sumer, Singh Sandeep, Sanjay Parjapati ML, Sharma Sandeep (2016) Estimation of source parameters of Nepal earthquake from strong motion data. Nat Hazards 83:867–883
38. Kameda H, Sugito M (1978) Prediction of strong earthquake motions by evolutionary process model. In: Proceedings of the sixth Japan earthquake engineering symposium, pp 41–48
39. Kanamori H (1979) A semi empirical approach to prediction of long period ground motions from great earthquakes. Bull Seism Soc Am 69:1645–1670
40. Kanamori H, Anderson DL (1975) Theoretical basis of some empirical relations in seismology. Bull Seism Soc Am 65:1073–1095
41. Khattri KN (1987) Great earthquakes, seismicity gaps and potential for earthquake disaster along the Himalayan Plate boundary. Tectonophysics 138:79–92
42. Khattri KN, Zeng Y, Anderson JG, Brune J (1994) Inversion of strong motion waveforms for source slip function of 1991 Uttarkashi earthquake, Himalaya. J Himalayan Geol 5:163–191
43. Kohrs-Sansorny C, Courboulex F, Bour M, Deschamps A (2005) A two-stage method for ground-motion simulation using stochastic summation of small earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:31–46
44. Kumar D, Sarkar I, Sriram V, Khattri KN (2005) Estimation of the source parameters of the Himalaya earthquake of October 19, 1991, average effective shear wave attenuation parameters and local site effects from accelerograms. Tectonophysics 407:1–24
45. Lai SP (1982) Statistical characterization of strong motions using power spectral density. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:259–274
46. McGuire RK, Becker AM, Donovan NC (1984) Spectral estimates of shear waves. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74:2167–2185
47. Midorikawa S (1993) Semi empirical estimation of peak ground acceleration from large earthquakes. Tectonophysics 218:287–295
48. Munguia L, Brune JM (1984) Simulations of strong ground motions for earthquakes in the Mexicali–Imperial Valley. In: Proc. of workshop on strong ground motion simulation and earthquake engineering applications, Pub. 85–02. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Los Altos, CA 21–1–21–19
49. Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Quarterly Report of RTRI 30:1, pp 25–33
50. Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS (2009) Seismic Hazard assessment—a holistic microzonation approach. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:1445–1495
51. Safarshahi M, Rezapour M, Hamzehloo H (2013) Stochastic finite-fault modelling of ground motion for the 2010 Rigan earthquake, Southeastern Iran. Bull Seism Soc Am 103(1):223–235
52. Sinozuka M, Sato Y (1967) Simulation of non stationary random processes. Proc. ASCE 93:11–40
53. Sriram V, Khattri KN (1997) A study of source spectrum, site amplifications, response spectra, Fourier Spectra and peak ground accelerations from the strong ground motion data of the Uttarkashi earthquake. Curr Sci 72:728–740
54. Wason HR, Sharma ML (2000) Source parameters study of local earthquakes in the Garhwal Himalaya region based on the digital broad band data. In: 12th World conference on earthquake engineering; Auckland, New Zealand, Sunday 30 January–Friday 4 February 2000, paper—1776
55. Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among Magnitude, Rupture Length, Rupture width, Rupture Area, and source displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84:974–1002
56. Yin A (2006) Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Himalayan orogen as constrained by along-strike variation of structural geometry, exhumation history, and forehand sedimentation. Earth Sci Rev 76:1–131
57. Yu G (1994) Some aspects of earthquake Seismogy: slip partitioning along major convergent plate boundaries; composite source model for estimation of strong motion; and nonlinear soil response modelling. PhD thesis, University of Nevada
58. Yu G, Khattri KN, Anderson JG, Brune JN, Zeng Y (1995) Strong ground motion from the Uttarkashi, Himalaya, India, earthquake: comparison of observations with synthetics using the composite source model. Bull Seism Soc Am 85:31–50
59. Zeng Y, Anderson JG, Su F (1994) A composite source model for computing realistic synthetic strong ground motions. Geophys Res Let 21:725–728

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-ad68f39a-af09-4b05-a317-248b251af58e