A Decision Support Tool for VTS Centers to Detect Grounding Candidates

• Autorzy: Mazaheri A. , Goerlandt F. , Kujala P. , Montewka J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

AIS (Automatic Identification System) data analysis is used to define ship domain for ground-ing scenarios. The domain has been divided into two areas as inner and outer domains. Inner domain has clear border, which is based on ship dynamic characteristics. Violation of inner domain makes the grounding acci-dent unavoidable. Outer domain area is defined with AIS data analyzing. Outer domain shows the situation of own ship in compare with other similar ships that previously were in the same situation. The domain can be used as a decision support tool in VTS (Vessel Traffic Service) centers to detect grounding candidate vessels. In the case study presented in this paper, one type of ship, which is tanker, in a waterway to Sköldvik in the Gulf of Finland is taken into account.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Decision Support Tools; Automatic Identification System (AIS); Gulf of Finland; safety at sea

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 6, no. 3
• Strony: 337--343
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 21 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Mazaheri A.

• Aalto University School of Engineering, Espoo, Finland

autor

Goerlandt F.

• Aalto University School of Engineering, Espoo, Finland

autor

Kujala P.

• Aalto University School of Engineering, Espoo, Finland

autor

Montewka J.

• Aalto University School of Engineering, Espoo, Finland Maritime University of Szczecin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Kite-Powell, H.L., et al., Investigation of Potential Risk Factors for Groundings of Commercial Vessels in U.S. Ports. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 1999. 9(1): p. 16-21.
• 2. Jebsen, J.J. & V.C. Papakonstantinou, Evaluation of the Physical Risk of Ship Grounding, in Department of Ocean Engineering. 1997, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. p. 239.
• 3. Samuelides, M.S., N.P. Ventikos, & I.C. Gemelos, Survey on grounding incidents: Statistical analysis and risk assessment. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2009. 4(1): p. 55-68.
• 4. Fujii, Y. & K. Tanaka, Traffic Capacity. The Journal of Navigation, 1971. 4: p. 543-552.
• 5. Goodwin, E.M., A statistical study of ship domains. The Journal of Navigation, 1975. 28(3): p. 328-344.
• 6. Davis, P.V., M.J. Dove, & C.T. Stockel, A computer simulation of marine traffic using domains and arenas. The Journal of Navigation, 1980. 33: p. 215-222.
• 7. Coldwell, T.G., Marine Traffic Behaviour in Restricted Wa-ters. The Journal of Navigation, 1983. 36: p. 430-444.
• 8. Zhao, J., Z. Wu, and F. Wang, Comments on Ship Domains. The Journal of Navigation, 1993. 46(3): p. 422-436.
• 9. Lisowski, J., A. Rak, & W. Czechowicz, Neural netwrok classifier for ship domain assessment. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2000(51): p. 399-406.
• 10. Zhu, X., H. Xu, & J. Lin, Domain and its model based on neural networks. The Journal of Navigation, 2001. 54(1): p. 97-103.
• 11. Pietrzykowski, Z. & J. Uriasz, Methods and criteria of navigational situation assessment in an open sea area, in 4th International conference on computer and IT applications in the maritime industries, Compit'05. 2005: Hamburg, Germany.
• 12. Pietrzykowski, Z. & J. Uriasz, Ship domain in navigational situation assessment in an open sea area, in 5th Interna-tional conference on computer and IT applications in the maritime industries, Compit'06. 2006: Oud Poelgeest, Lei-den, Netherlands.
• 13. Pietrzykowski, Z., Ship's Fuzzy Domain - a Criterion for Navigational Safety in Narrow Fairways. The Journal of Navigation, 2008. 61: p. 499-514.
• 14. Pietrzykowski, Z. & J. Uriasz, The Ship Domain - A Crite-rion of Navigational Safety Assessment in an Open Sea Ar-ea. The Journal of Navigation, 2009. 62(1): p. 93-108.
• 15. Wang, N., An intelligent spatial collision risk based on the quaternion ship domain. The Journal of Navigation, 2010. 63: p. 733-749.
• 16. Wang, N., et al., A unified analytical framework for ship domains. The Journal of Navigation, 2009. 62: p. 643-655.
• 17. Mazaheri, A., Probabilistic Modeling of Ship Grounding - A review of the literature, in TKK-AM-10. 2009, Helsinki University of Technology: Espoo. p. 73.
• 18. Mandel, P., Ship Maneuvering and Control, in Principles of Naval Architecture, J.P. Comstock, Editor. 1967: New York. p. 463-606.
• 19. Montewka, J., et al., Probability modelling of vessel colli-sions. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2010. 95: p. 573-589.
• 20. Lataire, E., et al., Navigation in confined waters: Influence of bank characteristics on ship-bank interaction, in Interna-tional Conference on Marine Research and Transportation. 2007: Ischia, Italy. p. 135-143.
• 21. Derrett, D.R., Ship Squat, in Ship Stability for Masters and Mates, C.B. Barrass, Editor. 1999.