PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Software Startups – A Research Agenda

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited time frames and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models. Software startups are quite distinct from traditional mature software companies, but also from micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises, introducing new challenges relevant for software engineering research. This paper’s research agenda focuses on software engineering in startups, identifying, in particular, 70+ research questions in the areas of supporting startup engineering activities, startup evolution models and patterns, ecosystems and innovation hubs, human aspects in software startups, applying startup concepts in non-startup environments, and methodologies and theories for startup research. We connect and motivate this research agenda with past studies in software startup research, while pointing out possible future directions. While all authors of this research agenda have their main background in Software Engineering or Computer Science, their interestin software startups broadens the perspective to the challenges, but also to the opportunities that emerge from multi-disciplinary research. Our audience is therefore primarily software engineering researchers, even though we aim at stimulating collaborations and research that crosses disciplinary boundaries. We believe that with this research agenda we cover a wide spectrum of the software startup industry current needs.
Rocznik
Strony
89--123
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 189 poz., rys.
Twórcy
  • Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
autor
  • Free University of Bolzano-Bozen, Italy
  • Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
autor
  • SICS, Sweden
autor
  • Free University of Bolzano-Bozen, Italy
autor
  • Lake Constance University, Germany
autor
  • National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
autor
  • National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
autor
  • National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland
autor
  • Free University of Bolzano-Bozen, Italy
  • Technical University of Madrid, Spain
autor
  • Technical University of Madrid, Spain
autor
  • Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
autor
  • Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
autor
  • Tampere University of Technology
autor
  • University of São Paulo, Brazil
autor
  • University of Cagliari, Italy
autor
  • University of Cagliari, Italy
autor
  • National University of Ireland Maynooth,
autor
  • University of Oulu
autor
  • National University of Ireland Maynooth Ireland
autor
  • University of Oulu
autor
  • National University of Ireland Galway
  • Hochschule Konstanz, Germany
autor
  • National University of Ireland Maynooth Ireland
autor
  • Technical University of Madrid, Spain
Bibliografia
  • [1] 42010-2011ISO/IEC/IEEE Systems and software engineering – Architecture description, ISO Std., 2011.
  • [2] N. Paternoster, C. Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner, T. Gorschek, and P. Abrahamsson, “Software Development in Startup Companies: A Systematic Mapping Study,” Information and Software Technology, Vol. 56, No. 10, 2014, pp. 1200–1218.
  • [3] “Frequently asked questions about small business,” U.S. Small Business Administration, Tech. Rep., 2014.
  • [4] S. Nambisan, K. Lyytinen, A. Majchrzak, and M. Song, “Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World,” MIS Quarterly, 2016, in press.
  • [5] “A cambrian moment cheap and ubiquitous building blocks for digital products and services have caused an explosion in startups. special report: Tech startups,” The Economist, 18/01 2014.
  • [6] WMF, “Intelligent assets unlocking the circular economy potential,” World Economic Forum, Tech. Rep., December 2015.
  • [7] S. Srinivasan, I. Barchas, M. Gorenberg, and E. Simoudis, “Venture Capital: Fueling the Innovation Economy,” Computer, Vol. 47, No. 8, 2014, pp. 40–47.
  • [8] A. Shontell, “The 11 most disruptive startups,” Business Insider, 12/07 2012. [Online]. http://www.businessinsider. com/disruptive-startups-2012-7?op=1&IR=T
  • [9] C. Giardino, N. Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner, T. Gorschek, and P. Abrahamsson, “Software Development in Startup Companies: The Greenfield Startup Model,” Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 42, No. 6, 2016, pp. 585–604.
  • [10] “Progress without profits. A flock of startups is making cloud computing faster and more flexible, but most of them will not survive,” The Economist, 19/09 2015.
  • [11] “Testing, testing,” The Economist, 18/01 2014.
  • [12] C. Giardino, S.S. Bajwa, X. Wang, and P. Abrahamsson, “Key Challenges in Early-Stage Software Startups,” in Proceedings 16th International XP Conference (XP). Helsinki, Finland: Springer, 2015, pp. 52–63.[Online]. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_5
  • [13] E. Ries, The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Crown Books,2011.
  • [14] S. Blank, The Four Steps to the Epiphany: Successful Strategies for Products that Win. Cafepress.com, 2005. [Online]. http://www.amazon.com/The-Four-Steps-Epiphany-Successful/dp/0976470705
  • [15] S. Blank and B. Dorf, The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-By-Step Guide for Building a Great Company. K & S Ranch, 2012.
  • [16] S.M. Sutton, “The Role of Process in a Software Start-up,” IEEE Softw., Vol. 17, No. 4, 2000, pp. 33–39. [Online]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ 52.854066
  • [17] E. Carmel, “Time-to-completion in software package startups,” in Proceedings 27th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE, 1994, pp. 498–507. [Online]. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/articleDetails. jsp?arnumber=323468
  • [18] O.P. Hilmola, P. Helo, and L. Ojala, “The value of product development lead time in software startup,” System Dynamics Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2003, pp. 75–82. [Online] http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/sdr.255
  • [19] G. Coleman and R.V. O’Connor, “An investigation into software development process formation in software start-ups,” Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2008, pp. 633–648. [Online]. http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/ 17410390810911221
  • [20] C. Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner, N. Paternoster, T. Gorschek, and P. Abrahamsson, “What do we know about software development in startups?” IEEE Software, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2014, pp. 28–32.
  • [21] I.C. Macmillan, L. Zemann, and P. Subbanarasimha,“Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process,” Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1987, pp. 123–137.
  • [22] C. Giardino, X. Wang, and P. Abrahamsson,“Why early-stage software startups fail: A behavioral framework,” in Proceedings 5th International Conference on Software Business (ICSOB). Paphos, Cyprus: Springer, 2014, pp.27–41. [Online]. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-08738-2{_}3
  • [23] Z. Block and I.C. MacMillan, “Milestones for successful venture planning,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 63, No. 5, 1985, pp. 184–196.
  • [24] E. Klotins, M. Unterkalmsteiner, and T. Gorschek, “Software Engineering in Start-up Companies: an Exploratory Study of 88 Startups,” Empirical Software Engineering, 2016, in Submission.
  • [25] A. Yau and C. Murphy, “Is a Rigorous Agile Methodology the Best Development Strategy for Small Scale Tech Startups?” Technical Report MS-CIS-13-01, 2013. [Online].http://repository.upenn.edu/cis_reports/980
  • [26] E. Klotins, M. Unterkalmsteiner, and T. Gorschek, “Software engineering practices in start-up companies: A mapping study,” in 6th International Conference on Software Business. Springer, 2015, pp. 245–257.
  • [27] K. Petersen and C. Wohlin, “Context in Industrial Software Engineering Research,” in Proceedings 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). Orlando, USA: IEEE, 2009, pp. 401–404.
  • [28] P. Clarke and R.V. O’Connor, “The situational factors that affect the software development process: Towards a comprehensive reference framework,” Information and Software Technology, Vol. 54, No. 5, 2012, pp. 433–447. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0950584911002369
  • [29] T. Dybå, D.I. Sjøberg, and D.S. Cruzes, “What Works for Whom, Where, When, and Why?: On the Role of Context in Empirical Software Engineering,” in Proceedings International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM). Lund, Sweden: ACM, 2012, pp. 19–28. [Online]. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2372251.2372256
  • [30] D. Kirk and S.G. MacDonell, “Investigating a Conceptual Construct for Software Context,” in Proceedings 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE). London, UK: ACM, 2014, pp. 27:1–27:10. [Online]. http://doi.acm.org/ 10.1145/2601248.2601263
  • [31] D. Kirk and S. MacDonell, “Categorising Software Contexts,” in Proceedings 2014 Americas Conference on Information Systems (AM CIS). Savannah, USA: AIS Electronic Library, 2014. [Online]. http://aisel.aisnet.org/ amcis2014/Posters/ITProjectManagement/8
  • [32] T. Feng, L. Sun, C. Zhu, and A.S. Sohal, “Customer orientation for decreasing time-to-market of new products IT implementation as a complementary asset,” Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2012, pp. 929–939.
  • [33] E. Tom, A. Aurum, and R. Vidgen, “An exploration of technical debt,” Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 86, No. 6, 2013, pp. 1498–1516. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0164121213000022
  • [34] C. Fernández-Sánchez, J. Garbajosa, and A. Yagüe, “A framework to aid in decision making for technical debt management,” in Proceedings 7th International Workshop on Managing Technical Debt (MTD). Bremen, Germany: IEEE, 2015, pp. 69–76.
  • [35] Z. Li, P. Avgeriou, and P. Liang, “A systematic mapping study on technical debt and its management,” Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 101, 2015, pp. 193–220. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0164121214002854
  • [36] E. Lim, N. Taksande, and C. Seaman, “A balancing act: What software practitioners have to say about technical debt,” IEEE Software, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2012, pp. 22–27.
  • [37] F. Shull, D. Falessi, C. Seaman, M. Diep, and L. Layman, “Technical Debt: Showing the Way for Better Transfer of Empirical Results,” in Perspectives on the Future of Software Engineering. Springer, 2013, pp. 179–190.
  • [38] F. Johne and P.A. Snelson, “Success factors in product innovation: A selective review of the literature,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1988, pp. 114–128.
  • [39] D. Lippoldt and P. Stryszowski, “Innovation in the software sector,” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Tech. Rep., 2009.
  • [40] H. Edison, N. bin Ali, and R. Torkar, “Towards innovation measurement in the software industry,” Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 86, No. 5, 2013, pp. 1390–1407. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0164121213000058
  • [41] W. Eversheim, Innovation Management for Technical Products: Systematic and Integrated Product Development and Production Planning. Springer Science & Business Media, 2008.
  • [42] M.M. Crossan and M. Apaydin, “A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature,” Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 47, No. 6,2009, pp. 1154–1191. [Online]. http://doi.wiley. com/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
  • [43] R. Balachandra and J. Friar, “Factors for success in R/D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 44, No. 3, 1997, pp. 276–287.
  • [44] R.G. Cooper, “From experience – the invisible success factors in product innovation,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1999, pp. 115–133.
  • [45] “Software engineering – software product quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE) – guide to SQuaRE – ISO/IEC 25000:2005,” International Organization for Standardization, Tech. Rep., 2005.
  • [46] A. Yagüe, J. Garbajosa, J. Pérez, and J. Díaz, “Analyzing Software Product Innovation Assessment by Using a Systematic Literature Review,” in Proceedings 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Waikoloa, USA: IEEE, 2014, pp. 5049–5058.
  • [47] M. Pikkarainen, W. Codenie, N. Boucart, and J.A. Heredia Alvaro, Eds., The Art of Software Innovation. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2011.
  • [48] H. Lichter, M. Schneider-Hufschmidt, and H. Züllighoven, “Prototyping in Industrial Software Projects–Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice,” in Proceedings 15th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). Baltimore, USA: IEEE, 1993, pp.221–229.
  • [49] M. Beaudouin-Lafon and W.E. Mackay, Prototyping development and tools,” Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 2002, pp. 1006–1031.
  • [50] I. Sommerville, Software Engineering, 9th ed.Boston: Pearson, 2010.
  • [51] T. Brown, Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York: HarperBusiness, 2009.
  • [52] A. Efeoğlu, C. Møller, and M. Sérié, “Solution Prototyping with Design Thinking – Social Media for SAP Store: A Case Study,” in Proceedings European Design Science Symposium (EDSS). Dublin, Ireland: Springer, 2013, pp.99–110.
  • [53] P. Newman, M.A. Ferrario, W. Simm, S. Forshaw, A. Friday, and J. Whittle, “The role of design thinking and physical prototyping in social software engineering,” 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering,2015.
  • [54] C. Grevet and E. Gilbert, “Piggyback prototyping: Using existing, large-scale social computing systems to prototype new ones,” in Proceedings 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Seoul, Korea: ACM, 2015, pp. 4047–4056. [Online]. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2702123.2702395
  • [55] A. Nguyen Duc and P. Abrahamsson, “Minimum viable product or multiple facet product? The Role of MVP in software startups,” in Proceedings 17th International XP Conference. Edinburgh, UK: Springer, 2016.
  • [56] T. Raz and E. Michael, “Use and benefits of tools for project risk management,” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2001, pp. 9–17. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0263786399000368
  • [57]L. Cocco, K. Mannaro, G. Concas, and M. Marchesi, “Simulating Kanban and Scrum vs. Waterfall with System Dynamics,” in Proceedings 12th Internation XP Conference (XP). Madrid, Spain: Springer, 2011, pp. 117–131. [Online]. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-20677-1_9
  • [58] G. Concas, M.I. Lunesu, M. Marchesi, and H. Zhang, “Simulation of software maintenance process, with and without a work-in-process limit,” Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, Vol. 25, No. 12, 2013, pp. 1225–1248. [Online]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smr.1599/abstract
  • [59] H. Edison, D. Khanna, S.S. Bajwa, V. Brancaleoni, and L. Bellettati, “Towards a Software Tool Portal to Support Startup Process,” in Proceedings 1st International Workshop on Software Startups. Bolzano, Italy: Springer, 2015, pp. 577–583. [Online]. http://link.springer.com/ chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_43
  • [60] J. Zettel, F. Maurer, J. Münch, and L. Wong,“LIPE: a lightweight process for e-business startup companies based on extreme programming,” in Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES). Kaiserslautern, Germany: Springer, 2001, pp. 255–270.
  • [61] M.D. Kelly, “Lessons Learned from Software Testing at Startups,” in EuroStar-Software Testing Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012.
  • [62] R.K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd ed. Sage Publications, 2003.
  • [63] Ergonomics of Human-system Interaction: Part 210: Human-centred Design for Interactive Systems, ISO Std., 2010.
  • [64] J. Füller, R. Schroll, and E. von Hippel, “User generated brands and their contribution to the diffusion of user innovations,” Research Policy, Vol. 42, No. 6–7, 2013, pp. 1197–1209. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S004873331300053X
  • [65] L. Hokkanen and K. Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, “UX work in startups: current practices and future needs,” in Proceedings 16th International XP Conference (XP). Helsinki, Finland: Springer, 2015, pp. 81–92. [Online]. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10. 1007/978-3-319-18612-2_7
  • [66] B. May, “Applying Lean Startup: An Experience Report – Lean & Lean UX by a UX Veteran: Lessons Learned in Creating & Launching a Complex Consumer App,” in Proceedings Agile Conference (AGILE). Dallas, USA: IEEE, 2012, pp. 141–147.
  • [67] M. Taipale, “Huitale–A Story of a Finnish Lean Startup,” in Proceedings 1st International Conference on Lean Enterprise and Software Systems (LESS). Helsinki, Finland: Springer, 2010, pp. 111–114. [Online]. http://www.springerlink. com/index/w48n06l04712621p.pdf
  • [68] L. Hokkanen, K. Kuusinen, and K. Väänänen,“Early Product Design in Startups: Towardsa UX Strategy,” in Proceedings 16thInternational Conference on Product-FocusedSoftware Process Improvement (PROFES).Bolzano-Bozen, Italy: Springer, 2015, pp.217–224. [Online]. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_16
  • [69] L. Hokkanen and M. Leppänen, “Three Patternsfor User Involvement in Startups,” in Proceedings20th European Conference on PatternLanguages of Programs (EuroPLoP). KlosterIrsee, Germany: ACM, 2015, pp. 51:1–51:8.[Online]. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2855321.2855373
  • [70] L. Hokkanen, K. Kuusinen, and K. Väänänen, “Minimum viable user experience: A framework for supporting product design in startups,” in Proceedings 17th International XP Conference (XP). Edinburgh, Scotland: Springer, 2016, in press.
  • [71] J. Nazar, “14 Famous Business Pivots,” Forbes, 2013. [Online]. http://www.forbes.com/sites/ jasonnazar/2013/10/08/14-famous-businesspivots/
  • [72] J. Bosch, V.D. Veen, and J. Salvador, “Pivots and Architectural Decisions: Two Sides of the Same Medal?” in Chalmers Publication Library (CPL), 2013, pp. 310–317. [Online]. http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/ publication/189719-pivots-and-architecturaldecisions-two-sides-of-the-same-medal
  • [73] H. Terho, S. Suonsyrjä, A. Karisalo, and T. Mikkonen, Ways to Cross the Rubicon: Pivoting
  • in Software Startups. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 555–568. [Online]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 26844-6_41
  • [74] S. Shahid Bajwa, X. Wang, A. Nguven Duc, and P. Abrahamsson, “How do software startups pivot? empirical results from a multiple case study,” in 7th International Conference on Software Business (ICSOB 2016), Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2016, pp. 169–176.
  • [75] H. Löfsten and P. Lindelöf, “Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms–academic-industry links, innovation and markets,” Research Policy, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2002, pp. 859–876. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0048733301001536
  • [76] J.S. Gans and S. Stern, “The product market and the market for “ideas”: commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs,” Research Policy, Vol. 32, No. 2, 2003, pp. 333–350. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0048733302001038
  • [77] A. Brem and K.I. Voigt, “Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management – Insights from the German software industry,” Technovation, Vol. 29, No. 5, 2009, pp. 351–367. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0166497208000898
  • [78] A. Maurya, Running Lean: Iterate from Plan A to a Plan That Works. O’Reilly Media, Inc.,2012.
  • [79] K. Klyver and M.T. Schenkel, “From Resource Access to Use: Exploring the Impact of Resource Combinations on Nascent Entrepreneurship,”Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 51, No. 4, 2013, pp. 539–556.[Online]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsbm.12030/abstract
  • [80] J. Levie and B.B. Lichtenstein, “A Terminal Assessment of Stages Theory: Introducing a Dynamic States Approach to Entrepreneurship,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2010, pp. 317–350. [Online]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00377.x/abstract
  • [81] F. Giones and F. Miralles, “Strategic Signalingin Dynamic Technology Markets: Lessons From Three IT Startups in Spain,” Global Business and Organizational Excellence, Vol. 34, No. 6, 2015, pp. 42–50. [Online]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joe.21634/abstract
  • [82] B. Clarysse, J. Bruneel, and M. Wright, “Explaining growth paths of young technology-based firms: structuring resource portfolios in different competitive environments,” Strategic EntrepreneurshipJournal, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2011, pp. 137–157.[Online]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sej.111/abstract
  • [83] S.L. Newbert and E.T. Tornikoski, “Supporter networks and network growth: a contingency model of organizational emergence,” Smal l Business Economics, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2010, pp. 141–159. [Online]. http://link.springer.com/ article/10.1007/s11187-010-9300-9
  • [84] T. Semrau and S. Sigmund, “Networking Ability and the Financial Performance of New Ventures: A Mediation Analysis among Younger and More Mature Firms,” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2012, pp.335–354. [Online]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/10.1002/sej.1146/abstract
  • [85] P. Witt, “Entrepreneurs’ networks and the success of start-ups,” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2004, pp.391–412. [Online]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0898562042000188423
  • [86] K.M. Eisenhardt and J.A. Martin, “Dynamic capabilities: what are they?” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 10-11, 2000, pp. 1105–1121. [Online]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AIDSMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E/abstract
  • [87] D.J. Teece, G. Pisano, and A. Shuen, “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, 1997, pp. 509–533. [Online]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AIDSMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z/abstract
  • [88] S.L. Newbert, S. Gopalakrishnan, and B.A. Kirchhoff, “Looking beyond resources: Exploring the importance of entrepreneurship to firm-level competitive advantage in technologically intensive industries,” Technovation, Vol. 28, No. 1–2, 2008, pp. 6–19. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0166497207000910
  • [89] B.B. Lichtenstein, K.J. Dooley, and G.T. Lumpkin, “Measuring emergence in the dynamics of new venture creation,” Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2006, pp.153–175. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0883902605000376
  • [90] C.G. Brush, T.S. Manolova, and L.F. Edelman, “Properties of emerging organizations: An empirical test,” Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 23, No. 5, 2008, pp. 547–566. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0883902607000602
  • [91] J. Katz and W.B. Gartner, “Properties of Emerging Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, No. 3, 1988, pp. 429–441. [Online]. http://amr.aom.org/content/13/3/429
  • [92] B. Honig and T. Karlsson, “Institutional forces and the written business plan,” Journal of Management, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2004, pp. 29–48. [Online]. http://jom.sagepub.com/content/30/1/29
  • [93] D. Kirsh, B. Goldfarb, and A. Gera, “Firm or substance: the role of business plans in venture capital decision making process,” Strategic Management Journal, No. 30, 2009, pp.487–515.
  • [94] T. Karlsson and B. Honig, “Judging a business by its cover: An institutional perspective on new ventures and the business plan,” Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2009, pp.27–45. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883902607000791
  • [95] M. König, G. Baltes, and B. Katzy, “On the role of value-network strength as an indicator of technology-based venture’s survival and growth: Increasing innovation system efficiency by leveraging transaction relations to prioritize venture support,” in Proceedings International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation/ International Technology Management Conference (ICE/ITMC). IEEE, 2015, pp.1–9. [Online]. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6904149
  • [96] K. Dovan, “Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations,” Human Communication Research, Vol. 30, No. 3, 1998, pp. 411–433.
  • [97] S. Elo and H. Kyngäs, “The qualitative content analysis process,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 62, No. 1, 2008, pp. 107–115. [Online]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x/abstract
  • [98] M. König, C. Ungerer, R. Büchele, and G. Baltes, “Agreement on the Venture’s Reality Presented in Business Plans,” in Proceedings22nd International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE). Trondheim, Norway: IEEE, 2016.
  • [99] C. Ungerer, M. König, F. Giones, and G. Baltes, “Measuring Venture Emergence and Survival by Analyzing Transaction Relations in Business Plans,” in Proceedings 22nd International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE). Trondheim, Norway: IEEE, 2016.
  • [100] S. Marlow, “Human resource management in smaller firms: A contradiction interms?” Human Resource Management Re-view, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2006, pp. 467–477. [On-line]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053482206000684
  • [101] S. Jack, J. Hyman, and F. Osborne, “Small entrepreneurial ventures culture, change and the impact on HRM: A critical review,” Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2006, pp. 456–466. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S1053482206000672
  • [102] J. Bosch, H.H. Olsson, J. Björk, and J. Ljungblad, “The Early Stage Software Startup Development Model: A Framework for Operationalizing Lean Principles in Software Startups,” in Proceedings 4th International Conference on Lean Enterprise Software and Systems (LESS). Galway, Ireland: Springer, 2013, pp. 1–15.
  • [103] T. Dingsøyr and Y. Lindsjørn, “Team performance in agile development teams: Findings from 18 focus groups,” in Proceedings 14th International Conference on Agile Software Development, Vienna, Austria, 2013, pp. 46–60. [Online]. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-642-38314-4
  • [104] J.R. Katzenbach and D.K. Smith, “The discipline of teams.” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 71, No. 2, 1993, pp. 111–120.
  • [105] O. Oechslein and A. Tumasjan, “Examining trust within the team in it startup companies–an empirical study in the people’s republic of china,” in Proceedings 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), Maui, USA, 2012, pp. 5102–5111. [Online]. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_ all.jsp?arnumber=6149511
  • [106] J. Kamm, J. Shuman, J. Seeger, and A. Nurick, “Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: A research agenda,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1990, pp. 7–17.
  • [107] D. Francis and W. Sandberg, “Friendship within entrepreneurial teams and its association with team and venture performance,” Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2000, pp. 5–21. [Online]. http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA74524630&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1& it=r&linkaccess=fulltext&issn=10422587&p= AONE&sw=w
  • [108] M. Crowne, “Why software product startups fail and what to do about it,” in International Engineering Management Conference (IEMC). Cambridge, UK: IEEE, 2002, pp. 338–343.
  • [109] M.D. Ensley, K.M. Hmieleski, and C.L.Pearce, “The importance of vertical andshared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups,” The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2006, pp. 217–231. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S1048984306000051
  • [110] R.G. Cooper, “Perspective: The innovation dilemma: How to innovate when the market is mature,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 28, No. SUPPL. 1, 2011, pp. 2–27.
  • [111] C.K. Bart, “New venture units: use them wisely to manage innovation,” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1988, pp. 35–43.
  • [112] S.A. Hill and J. Birkinshaw, “Ambidexterity and survival in corporate venture units,” Journal of Management, Vol. 40, No. 7, 2014, pp.1899–1931. [Online]. http://jom.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0149206312445925
  • [113] J.J.P. Jansen, M.P. Tempelaar, F.A.J. van den Bosch, and H.W. Volberda, “Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms,” Organization Science, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2009, pp. 797–811. [Online]. http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/orsc.1080.0415
  • [114] R. Nanda and M. Rhodes-Kropf, “Investment cycles and startup innovation,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 110, No. 2, 2013, pp.403–418.
  • [115] D. Lavie, U. Stettner, and M.L. Tushman, “Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations,” The Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2010, pp. 109–155. [Online]. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19416521003691287
  • [116] J. Lerner, “Corporate venturing,” HarvardBusiness Review, Vol. 91, No. 10, 2013, pp.86–94.
  • [117] C.A. O’Reilly and M.L. Tushman, “Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future,” Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2013, pp. 324–338. [Online]. http://amp. aom.org/cgi/doi/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
  • [118] D.A. Garvin and L.C. Levesque, “Meeting the challenge of corporate entrepreneurship.” Harvard business review, Vol. 84, No. 10, 2006, pp.102–12, 150. [Online]. http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/pubmed/17040043
  • [119] H. Edison, X. Wang, and P. Abrahamsson, “Lean startup,” in Scientific Workshop Proceedings of the XP conference. Helsinki, Finland: ACM, 2015, pp. 1–7. [Online]. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2764979.2764981
  • [120] C.J. Chen, “Technology commercialization, incubator and venture capital, and new venture performance,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 62, No. 1, 2009, pp. 93–103.
  • [121] S. Coleman, C. Cotei, and J. Farhat, “A resource-based view of new firm survival: new perspectives on the role of industry and exit route,” Journal of Developmental Entrepreneur ship, Vol. 18, No. 01, 2013, pp. 1–25. [Online]. http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1084946713500027
  • [122] G.G. Dess, R.D. Ireland, S.A. Zahra, S.W.Floyd, J.J. Janney, and P.J. Lane, “Emerging issues in corporate entrepreneurship,” Journal of Management, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2003, pp. 351–378. [Online]. http://jom.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1016/S0149-2063{_}03{_}00015-1
  • [123] A. Croll and B. Yoskovitz, Lean Analytics: Use Data to Build a Better Startup Faster, 1st ed. Sebastopol, USA: O’Reilly Media, 2013.
  • [124] P. Tyrväinen, M. Saarikallio, T. Aho, T. Lehtonen, and R. Paukeri, “Metrics Framework for Cycle-Time Reduction in Software Value Creation,” in Proceedings 10th International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA). Barcelona, Spain: IARIA, 2015. [Online]. https://jyx.jyu.fi/ dspace/handle/123456789/47980
  • [125] T.R. Eisenmann, E. Ries, and S. Dillard, “Hypothesis-driven entrepreneurship: The lean startup,” Harvard Business School, 2012.
  • [126] J. Järvinen, T. Huomo, T. Mikkonen, and P. Tyrväinen, “From Agile Software Development to Mercury Business,” in Proceedings 5th International Conference on Software Business (ICSOB). Paphos, Cyprus: Springer, 2014, pp.58–71. [Online]. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-08738-2_5
  • [127] H. Edison, “A conceptual framework of lean startup enabled internal corporate venture,” in Proceedings 1st International Workshop on Software Startups. Bolzano-Bozen, Italy: Springer, 2015, pp. 607–613. [Online]. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-26844-6_46
  • [128] J. Märijärvi, L. Hokkanen, M. Komssi, H. Kiljander, Y. Xu, M. Raatikainen, P. Seppänen, J. Heininen, M. Koivulahti-Ojala, M. Helenius, and J. Järvinen, The Cookbook for Successful Internal Startups. DIGILE and N4S, 2016.
  • [129] S. Meskendahl, “The influence of business strategy on project portfolio management and its success – a conceptual framework,” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 28, No. 8, 2010, pp. 807–817.
  • [130] B.S. Blichfeldt and P. Eskerod, “Project portfolio management – there’s more to it than what management enacts,” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2008, pp.357–365.
  • [131] J.R. Turner, The handbook of project-based management. McGraw-Hill, 2014.
  • [132] H.W. Chesbrough, Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press, 2006.
  • [133] T. Hatzakis, M. Lycett, and A. Serrano, “A programme management approach for ensuring curriculum coherence in is (higher) education,” European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2007, pp. 643–657.
  • [134] B.D. Reyck, Y. Grushka-Cockayne, M. Lockett, S.R. Calderini, M. Moura, and A. Sloper, “The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects,” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 23, No. 7,2005, pp. 524–537.
  • [135] B. Kersten and C. Verhoef, “IT portfolio management: A banker’s perspective on IT,” Cutter IT Journal, 2003. [Online]. http://www.few.vu. nl/~x/bp/bp.pdf
  • [136] R. LeFave, B. Branch, C. Brown, and B. Wixom, “How sprint nextel reconfigured it resources for results,” MIS Quarterly, 2008. [Online]. http://misqe.org/ojs2/index.php/misqe/ article/view/213
  • [137] J. Krebs, Agile portfolio management, 1st ed.Microsoft Press, 2008.
  • [138] Y.Z. Anbardan and M. Raeyat, “Open innovation: Creating value through co-creation,” in Proceedings 7th World Conference on Mass Customization, Personalization, and Co-Creation (MCPC 2014). Aalborg, Denmark: Springer,2014, pp. 437–447.
  • [139] W. Vanhaverbeke and M. Cloodt, Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press, 2008, ch. Open innovation in value networks, pp. 258–284.
  • [140] V. Van de Vrande, J.P. De Jong, W. Vanhaverbeke, and M. De Rochemont, “Open innovation in smes: Trends, motives and management challenges,” Technovation, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2009, pp.423–437.
  • [141] J. West and S. Gallagher, “Challenges of open innovation: the paradox of firm investment in open-source software,” R&D Management, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2006, pp. 319–331. [On-line]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00436.x
  • [142] H. Chesbrough and A. Crowther, “Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries,” R&d Management, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2006, pp. 229–236. [Online]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x/full
  • [143] G. Hu, L. Wang, S. Fetch, and B. Bidanda, “A multi-objective model for project portfolio selection to implement lean and Six Sigma concepts,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 46, No. 23, 2008, pp. 6611–6625. [Online]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207540802230363
  • [144] M.A. Cusumano and K. Nobeoka, Thinking Beyond Lean: How Multi-project Management is Transforming Product Development at Toyota and Other Companies. Simon and Schuster,1998.
  • [145] F. Kon, D. Cukier, C. Melo, O. Hazzan, and H. Yuklea, “A conceptual framework for software startup ecosystems: the case of Israel,” Department of Computer Science, University of São Paulo, Tech. Rep. RT-MAC-2015-01„ 2015. [Online]. http://www.ime.usp.br/~kon/papers/ SoftwareStartupsConceputalFrameworkTR.pdf
  • [146] M.C. Fonseca, “O ecossistema de startups de software da cidade de são paulo,” Master’s thesis, University of São Paulo, 2016.
  • [147] D. Cukier, F. Kon, and L.S. Thomas, “Software startup ecosystems evolution: The New York City case study,” in Proceedings 2nd International Workshop on Software Startups. Trondheim, Norway: IEEE, 2016.
  • [148] D. Cukier, F. Kon, and N. Krueger, “Designing a maturity model for software startup ecosystems,” in Proceedings 1st International Workshop on Software Startups. Bolzano, Italy: Springer, 2015, pp. 600–606.
  • [149] B.L. Herrmann, J.F. Gauthier, D. Holtschke, R. Berman, and M. Marmer, “The global startup ecosystem ranking 2015,” Tech. Rep. August, 2015.
  • [150] A. Frenkel and S. Maital, Mapping National Innovation Ecosystems: Foundations for Policy Consensus. London, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2014.
  • [151] S. Jayshree and R. Ramraj, “Entrepreneurial ecosystem: Case study on the influence of environmental factors on entrepreneurial success,” European Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 4, No. 16, 2012, pp. 95–102.
  • [152] R. Sternberg, “Success factors of university-spin-offs: Regional government support programs versus regional environment,” Technovation, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2014, pp. 137–148. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/S0166497213001399
  • [153] M. Steinert and L.J. Leifer, “‘Finding One’s Way’: Re-Discovering a Hunter Gatherer Model based on Wayfaring,” International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2012, pp. 251–252.
  • [154] D.J. Snowden and M.E. Boone, “A leader’s framework for decision making,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 85, No. 11, 2007, pp. 69–76.
  • [155] S.D. Sarasvathy, “Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency,” Academy of Management, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2001, pp. 243–263. [Online]. http://www.jstor.org. proxy.lib.ul.ie/stable/info/259121
  • [156] P. Williams, “The Competent Boundary Spanner,” Public Administration, Vol. 80, No. 1, 2002, pp. 103–124. [Online]. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9299.00296/abstract
  • [157] A. Nguyen Duc, P. Seppänen, and P.K. Abrahamsson, “Hunter-gatherer cycle: a conceptual model of the evolution of software startups,” in Proceedings 2015 International Conference on Software and System Process. Tallin, Estonia: ACM, 2015, pp. 199–203.
  • [158] J. Pelrine, “On Understanding Software Agility: A Social Complexity Point Of View,” Emergence: Complexity & Organization, Vol. 13, No.1/2, 2011, pp. 26–37.
  • [159] J. Rikkila, P. Abrahamsson, and X. Wang, “The Implications of a Complexity Perspective for Software Engineering Practice and Research,” Journal of Computer Engineering & Information Technology, 2012. [Online]. http://www.scitechnol.com/2324-9307/ 2324-9307-1-e103.pdf
  • [160] A. Johri, “Boundary spanning knowledge broker: An emerging role in global engineering firms,” in Proceedings 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 2008, pp. 7–12.
  • [161] E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  • [162] J. Birkinshaw, G. Hamel, and M.J. Mol, “Management innovation,” Academy of management Review, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2008, pp. 825–845. [Online]. http://amr.aom.org/content/33/4/825.short [163] A.H.V.D. Ven and M.S. Poole, “Explaining Development and Change in Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 3,
  • 1995, pp. 510–540. [Online]. http://amr.aom. org/content/20/3/510
  • [164] S. Blank, “Why the lean start-up changes everything,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 91, No. 5, 2013.
  • [165] J.W. Mullins and R. Komisar, Getting to Plan B: Breaking Through to a Better Business Model. Harvard Business Press, 2009.
  • [166] C. Nobel, “Teaching a ‘Lean Startup’ Strategy,” HBS Working Knowledge, 2011. [Online]. http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/teaching-alean-startup-strategy
  • [167] Y. Harb, C. Noteboom, and S. Sarnikar, “Evaluating Project Characteristics for Selecting the Best-fit Agile Software Development Methodology: A Teaching Case,” Journal of the Midwest Association for Information Systems (JMWAIS), Vol. 1, No. 1, 2015. [Online]. http://aisel.aisnet.org/jmwais/vol1/iss1/4
  • [168] D. Dennehy, L. Kasraian, O. O’Raghallaigh, and K. Conboy, “Product Market Fit Frameworks for Lean Product Development,” in Proceedings R&D Management Conference 2016 “From Science to Society: Innovation and Value Creation”, Cambridge, UK, 2016.
  • [169] K. Conboy, “Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2009, pp. 329–354. [Online]. http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/isre.1090.0236
  • [170] M.B. Miles and A. Huberman, Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, US: Sage Publications, Inc, 1994.
  • [171] C. Wohlin, A. Aurum, L. Angelis, L. Phillips, Y. Dittrich, T. Gorschek, H. Grahn, K. Henningsson, S. Kagstrom, G. Low et al., “The success factors powering industry-academia collaboration,” IEEE software, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2012, p. 67.
  • [172] M. Unterkalmsteiner, T. Gorschek, A. Islam, C. Cheng, R. Permadi, and R. Feldt, “A conceptual framework for SPI evaluation,” Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, Vol. 26, No. 2,2014, pp. 251–279.
  • [173] B. Kitchenham, L. Madeyski, D. Budgen, J. Keung, P. Brereton, S. Charters, S. Gibbs, and A. Pohthong, “Robust Statistical Methods for Empirical Software Engineering,” Empirical Software Engineering, 2016, pp. 1–52. [Online]. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/ s10664-016-9437-5
  • [174] W. Hayes, “Research synthesis in software engineering: a case for meta-analysis,” in Proceedings 6th International Software Metrics Symposium. Boca Raton, USA: IEEE, 1999, pp. 143–151.
  • [175] T. Gorschek, C. Wohlin, P. Carre, and S. Larsson, “A Model for Technology Transfer in Practice,” IEEE Software, Vol. 23, No. 6, 2006, pp. 88–95.
  • [176] R. Wieringa, “Empirical research methods for technology validation: Scaling up to practice,” Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 95, 2014, pp. 19–31.
  • [177] P. Bourque and R.E. Fairley, Eds., Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge, 3rd ed. IEEE, 2014.
  • [178] E. Bjarnason, M. Unterkalmsteiner, E. Engström, and M. Borg, “A multi-case study of agile requirements engineering and using test cases as requirements,” Information and Software Technology, Vol. 77, 2016, pp. 61–79.
  • [179] B. Boehm, “Value-based Software Engineering,” SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2003, pp. 1–12.
  • [180] C.R.B.d. Souza, H. Sharp, J. Singer, L.T.
  • Cheng, and G. Venolia, “Guest Editors’ Introduction: Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering,” IEEE Software, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2009, pp. 17–19.
  • [181] C.D. Mulrow, “Rationale for systematic reviews.” BMJ: British Medical Journal, Vol. 309, No. 6954, 1994, pp. 597–599. [Online]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC2541393/
  • [182] B.A. Kitchenham, T. Dybå, and M. Jørgensen, “Evidence-Based Software Engineering,” in Proceedings 26th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). Edinburgh, UK: IEEE, 2004, pp. 273–281.
  • [183] R. Torkar, P. Minoves, and J. Garrigós, “Adopting free/libre/open source software practices, techniques and methods for industrial use,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2011, p. 88. [Online]. http://search.proquest.com/openview/ beaf4af76e081e0d38c0c1c574218df2/1
  • [184] E. von Hippel, “Innovation by User Communities: Learning from Open-Source Software,” MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2001, pp. 82–82. [Online]. http://adaptknowledge.com/wp-content/uploads/rapidintake/PI_CL/media/InnArticle.pdf
  • [185] J. West, “How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies,” Research Policy, Vol. 32, No. 7, 2003, pp. 1259–1285. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0048733303000520
  • [186] T. Dybå and T. Dingsøyr, “Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review,” Information and Software Technology, Vol. 50, No. 9–10, 2008, pp. 833–859. [Online]. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S0950584908000256
  • [187] M. Broy, “Challenges in Automotive Software Engineering,” in Proceedings 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). Shanghai, China: ACM, 2006, pp. 33–42. [Online]. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/ 1134285.1134292
  • [188] S. Chandra, V.S. Sinha, S. Sinha, and K. Ratakonda, “Software Services: A Research Roadmap,” in Future of Software Engineering (FOSE). Hyderabad, India: ACM, 2014, pp. 40–54. [Online]. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/ 2593882.2593892
  • [189] J. Cleland-Huang, O.C.Z. Gotel, J. Huffman Hayes, P. Mäder, and A. Zisman, “Software Traceability: Trends and Future Directions,” in Proceedings Future of Software Engineering. Hyderabad, India: ACM, 2014, pp. 55–69. [Online]. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/ 2593882.2593891
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-ad51cf97-c214-4a6c-a95d-706d6622c0cc
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.