Glocal leadership behaviors of managers working in private institutions

• Autorzy: Ercetin S. S. , Potas N. , Acikalin S. N. , Yilmaz M. , Kisa N. , Gungor H.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2017.16.2.07

Warianty tytułu

PL

Glokalne zachowania menadżerów pracujacych w prywatnych instytucjach

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Glocalization is a holistic approach that balances global and local dimensions. As it affects organizations, glocal leadership has started to be discussed. The aim of this study is to reveal the perceptions of managers of private institutions about fulfilling glocal leadership behaviors, and investigate if there is a meaningful difference in terms of gender, age, seniority, and education level variables. This study is designed to be descriptive research using the Multidimensional Glocal Leadership Scale developed by Ercetin et. al (2011) to collect the data. The population of the research is a self-existing sample of 378 managers who work in private institutions. According to the findings, managers perceive they are fulfilling the glocal leadership behavior and its dimensions at middle level. There are some differences found for gender, age, seniority and education level variables.

PL

Glokalizacja jest holistycznym podejściem, które równoważy wymiary globalne i lokalne. Ponieważ dotyka organizacji, zaczęto dyskutować o glokalnym przywództwie. Celem tego badania jest ujawnienie poglądów menedżerów prywatnych instytucji na temat glokalnych zachowań przywódczych i zbadanie, czy istnieje istotna różnica pod względem płci, wieku, stażu pracy i poziomu wykształcenia. Badanie to ma charakter opisowy i wykorzystuje Wielowymiarową Skalę Przywództwa Glokalnego opracowaną przez Ercetina (2011). Populacja badania jest samodzielną próbą 378 menedżerów pracujących w instytucjach prywatnych. Zgodnie z ustaleniami, menedżerowie dostrzegają, że realizują glokalne zachowanie przywódcze i jego wymiary na poziomie średnim. Istnieją pewne różnice dotyczące zmiennych pod względem płci, wieku, stażu pracy i poziomu wykształcenia.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

global; local; glocal; glocal leadership

PL

glokalne; przywództwo glokalne; wymiar globalny; wymiar lokalny

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 16, No. 2
• Strony: 74--87
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Ercetin S. S.

• Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

autor

Potas N.

• Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey

autor

Acikalin S. N.

• Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

autor

Yilmaz M.

• Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

autor

Kisa N.

• Ömer Halisdemir University, Niğde, Turkey

autor

Gungor H.

• Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. Aktan C.C., 1998, Globalleşme, Bölgeselleşme ve Yerelleşme, “Dış Ticaret Dergisi”, 10(3).
• 2. Altınbaş D., 2009, Globalleşme, Yerelleşme, Bölgeselleşme, Glokalleşme, “Stratejik Analiz”, 108.
• 3. Begley M.T., Boyd D.P., 2003, The Need for a Corporate Global Mind-Set, “MIT Sloan Management Review”, 44(2).
• 4. Burns N., Grove S.K., 2003, Understanding Nursing Research, 3rd Ed. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders Company.
• 5. Çakmaklı Y., 2011, Glokal Liderlik ve Davranışşal Göstergeleri Üzerine Bir Çalışma: Bir Kamu Kurumu Örneği, Yuksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara: Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu.
• 6. Chappelet J.L., 2009, A Glocal Vision for Sport and Sport Management, “European Sport Management Quarterly”, 9(4).
• 7. Dumitrescu L., Vinerean S., 2010, The Global Strategy of Global Brands, “Studies in Business and Economies”, 5(3).
• 8. Erçetin Ş.Ş., 1999, Kuantum Liderlik Paradigması ile Eğitim Liderliğinin Açımlanması, Cumhuriyet Döneminde Eğitim, Ankara: Talim ve Terbiye Dairesi Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.
• 9. Erçetin Ş.Ş., 2007, Küreselleşme Sürecinin Ulusal İzdüşümleri: Partiler ve liderleri Yarınlar İçin Düşünce Platformu, 3, Summer Working Camp, (10-12 October) Antalya, Turkey.
• 10. Erçetin S.S., Açıkalın Ş.N., Bülbül M.Ş., 2013, A Multi-Dimensional Approach to Leadership in Chaotic Environments, [In] S. Banerjee (Ed.), Chaos and Complexity Theory for Management: Nonlinear Dynamics, USA: IGI Global.
• 11. Erçetin S.S., Hamedoğlu M.A., 2007, Küreselleşme Sürecinde Ulusal Liderleri Roller ve Uluslar Arası İzdüşümleri, ICENAS 38, Uluslararası Asya ve Kuzey Afrika Çalışmaları Kongresi, Atatürk Kültür Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu, Book of Abstracts, 10-15 September, Ankara, Turkey.
• 12. Erçetin Ş.Ş., Hamedoğlu M.A., Açıkalın Ş., 2014, Can Managerial Narcissism, which Likely Leads to a Chaotic Process Be Measured? Managerial Narcissism Scale (MNS), [in] Ş.Ş. Erçetin, S. Banerjee (Eds), Chaos and Complexity Theory in World Politics, IGI Global: USA.
• 13. Erçetin Ş.Ş., Potas N., Açıkalın Ş.N., Kısa N., 2011, Multidimensional Glocal Leadership Scale, “Middle East Journal of Scientific Research”, 8(2).
• 14. Higgs M., Rowland D., 2009, Change Leadership: Case Study of a Global Energy Company, “Strategic Change”, 18(1-2).
• 15. Kalay I., 2016, Küresel Köy’ün Küyerel Bir Reklence Pratiği Olarak Web Dizisi: Proje 13 Örneği, “Global Media Journal TR Edition”, 7(13).
• 16. Khonder H.H., 2004, Glocalization As Globalization: Evolution of a Social Concept, “Bangladesh e-Journal of Sociology”, 1(2).
• 17. Knupfer N.N., McLellan H., 1996, Descriptive research methodologies, [In] D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, New York: Macmillan.
• 18. Koçak H., 2009, Küreselleşme ve Yerelleşme Çağında Yerel Demokrasi ve Kentsel Yaşam, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2.
• 19. Kramer R.J., 2005, Developing Global Leaders: Enhancing competencies and accelerating the expatriate experience, New York: The Conference Board.
• 20. Krishnamurthy U., 2007, The Future Leader: Glocal, Access on: 17.05.2013, http://www.siliconindia.com/magazine_articles/The_Future_Leader_GLOCALQWFG659034756.html.
• 21. Neyişci N., Potas N., 2012a, Avoidance Behaviors of School Managers in Uncertain and Chaotic Environments, [In] S. Banerjee, Ş.Ş. Erçetin (Eds), Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2012, Springer, Dordrecht.
• 22. Neyişci N., Potas N., 2012b, New Leadership Paradigms in the Complexity Science, [In] S. Banerjee, Ş.Ş. Erçetin (Eds), Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2012, Springer, Dordrecht.
• 23. Okur F., Çakıcı A.B., 2007, Küreselleşme Sürecinde Yerelleşme ve Yerel Demokrasi, “Akademik Bakış”, 11.
• 24. Şahin M., 2008, Yönetim Bilgi Sistemleri, Eskişehir: Anadolu Universitesi.
• 25. Shah H., Young H., 2009, Global Learning in Schools and the Implications for Policy, “Education Review”, 21(2).
• 26. Sharma D., 2013, A study of Globalization Concept as a Current Trend in Indian Economy, “SVIM e-journal of Applied Management”, 1(1).
• 27. Simmonds D., Tsui O., 2010, Effective design of a global leadership programme, “Human Resource Development International”, 13(5).
• 28. Svensson G., 2001, Glocalization of Business Activities: A Glocal Strategy Approach, “Management Decision”, 39(1).
• 29. Türkşen İ.B., Özkan İ., 2014, Recent Advancement in Fuzzy System: Full Type 2 Fuzziness, [In] S.S. Ercetin, S. Banerjee (Eds), Chaos and Complexity Theory in World Politics, IGI Global: USA.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).