The latest streams of research on communication in risk management: a large-scale literature review based on co-occurrence data

• Autorzy: Gorzeń-Mitka Iwona

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2020.149.20

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The scientific research on risk management has grown substantially over the past years. Communication on risk is central to the risk management strategy. As indicated by many researchers, communication is one of the key components of a successful risk management framework but, on the other hand, it is one of main categories of disruption and inefficiency in risk management process. Design/methodology/approach: The research aim is identification of the latest streams of research that concern communication in risk management by knowledge mapping and it provides a visualization reference in this research field. Some series of published papers on communication aspects in risk management in Scopus database from 2000 to 2018 were extracted. Then, based on the co-occurrence frequencies of key terms, mapping is done and clustering keywords are extracted by using VOSviewer software. Findings: The main research conclusions are as follows: (1) that communication studies are developing rapidly in the global academic community, (2) the frontier topics in this study consist of seven representative areas concentrated in main keywords like risk assessment, project management, risk perception, decision making, information management, risk analysis, disasters, and information technology, (3) the latest trends in research on communication aspects in risk management mainly include leadership context, climate change (especially regarding floods), food safety, corporate social responsibility, social media, and construction project. Research limitations/implications: This study investigated only leading trends in this area and identified selected challenges in an exploratory way. Practical implications: (not applicable). Social implications: (not applicable). Originality/value: This paper delivers an outline for main research trends in risk communication process within organisation

Słowa kluczowe

EN

risk management; communication; co-occurrence analysis; literature review

PL

zarządzanie ryzykiem; komunikacja; analiza współwystępowania; przegląd literatury

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: z. 149
• Strony: 219--236
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Gorzeń-Mitka Iwona

• Czestochowa University of Technology, Faculty of Management

Bibliografia

• 1. Beretta, S., and Bozzolan, S. (2004). A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication, International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 39, Iss. 3, pp. 265-288. doi:10.1016/j.intacc.2004.06.006.
• 2. Bochet, O., Laurent-Lucchetti, J., Leroux, J., and Sinclair-Desgagné, B. (2019). Collective risk-taking in the commons. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 163, pp. 277-296. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.04.011.
• 3. Bussotti, L. (2017). Risk management and risk communication in Mozambique: the case of arms and ammunition depots of Malhazine. Problems of Management in the 21st Century, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, pp. 94-105.
• 4. Danisman, G.O., and Demirel, P. (2019). Corporate risk management practices and firm value in an emerging market: A mixed methods approach. Risk Management, Vol. 21, Iss. 1, pp.19-47. doi: 10.1057/s41283-018-0040-5.
• 5. Gorzeń-Mitka, I. (2015). Gender differences in risk management. Small and medium sized enterprise perspective. Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics/Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wroclawiu, Vol. 412, pp. 80-89.
• 6. Gorzeń-Mitka, I. (2015). Management challenges in the context of risk culture. Problems of Management in the 21st Century, Vol. 10, Iss. 2, pp. 60-61.
• 7. Gorzeń-Mitka, I. (2016). Leading Risk Management Determinants of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs): An Exploratory Study in Poland. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, pp. 289-298. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-27570-3_23.
• 8. Gorzeń-Mitka, I. (2019). Interpretive structural modeling approach to analyze the interaction among key factors of risk management process in SMEs: Polish experience. European Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, pp. 339-349. doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n1p339.
• 9. Gudanowska, A.E. (2017). A map of current research trends within technology management in the light of selected literature. Management and Production Engineering Review, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, pp.78-88. doi: 10.1515/mper-2017-0009.
• 10. Hopkin, P. (2014). Fundamentals of risk management: understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management. London, England, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, New Delhi, India: Kogan Page.
• 11. Janoske, M., Brooke L., and Sheppard, B. (2012). Understanding Risk Communication Best Practices: A Guide for Emergency Managers and Communicators, Report to Human Factors/Behavioral Sciences Division, Science and Technology Directorate, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. College Park, MD: START.
• 12. Jelonek, D., Mesjasz-Lech, A., Stępniak, C., Turek, T., and Ziora, L. (2020). The artificial intelligence application in the management of contemporary organization: Theoretical assumptions, current practices and research review. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Vol. 69, pp. 319-327. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-12388-8_23.
• 13. Kelay, T., and Fife-Schaw, Ch. (2010). Effective Risk Communication: A Guide to Best Practice. Retrieved from https://www.techneau.org/fileadmin/files/Publications/Publications/Deliverables/D6.3.1-2.report.pdf, 7.06.2019.
• 14. Kim, Y., and Vonortas, N.S. (2014). Managing risk in the formative years: Evidence from young enterprises in Europe. Technovation, Vol. 34, Iss. 8, pp. 454-465. doi: 10.1016/ j.technovation.2014.05.004.
• 15. McComas, K.A. (2006). Defining moments in risk communication research: 1996-2005. Journal of Health Communication, Vol. 11, Iss. 1, pp. 75-91. doi: 10.1080/10810730500461091.
• 16. Ng, K.L., and Hamby, D.M. (1997). Fundamentals for establishing a risk communication program. Health Physics, Vol. 73, Iss. 3, pp. 473-482.
• 17. Palenchar, M.J. and Heath, R.L. (2007). Strategic risk communication: Adding value to society. Public Relations Review, Vol. 33, Iss. 2, pp. 120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.014.
• 18. Sipa, M. (2018). The Factors Determining the Creativity of the Human Capital in the Conditions of Sustainable Development, European Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 7, Iss. 2, pp. 1-13. doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n2p1.
• 19. Sitek, M. (2018). Assessment Of Sustainable Development Of The Residential Construction Sector In The Context Of Sustainable City Development In Poland. European Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, pp.434-444. doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n3p434.
• 20. Skibiński, A. (2018). Assessment of the Degree Aging Labour Force for Example of Poland and Slovakia. European Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, pp. 473-482. doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2018.v7n3p473-482.
• 21. Smolarek, M., and Sipa, M. (2017). The impact of CSR on the competitive position of small and medium enterprises. In: A.Jabłoński (Ed.), Sustainability and Scalability of Business: Theory and Practice (pp. 267-278). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
• 22. Taarup-Esbensen, J. (2019). Making Sense of Risk - A Sociological Perspective on the Management of Risk. Risk Analysis, Vol. 39, Iss. 4, pp. 749-760. doi: 10.1111/risa.13211.
• 23. van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L. (2019). VOSviewer Manual. Manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.11, software documentation.
• 24. Wieczorek-Kosmala, M. (2017). Kapitał ryzyka w przedsiębiorstwie. Warszawa: CEDEWU.
• 25. Xin, Z., Wen Long, Y., and Hai, L.V. (2018). Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domain of road safety studies. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 118, pp. 131-145. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.06.010.