Process of Judging Significant Modifications for Different Transportation Systems compared to the Approach for Nuclear Installations

• Autorzy: Petrek N. , Berg H. P.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.09.04.07

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The implementation of the CSM regulation by the European Commission in 2009 which harmonizes the risk assessment process and introduces a rather new concept of judging changes within the European railway industry. This circumstance has risen the question how other technology sectors handle the aspect of modifications and alterations. The paper discusses the approaches for judging the significance of modifications within the three transport sectors of European railways, aviation and maritime transportation and the procedure which is used in the area of nuclear safety. We will outline the similarities and differences between these four methods and discuss the underlying reasons. Finally, we will take into account the role of the European legislator and the fundamental idea of a harmonization of the different approaches.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Nuclear Installations; Green Culture in Shipping; Transportation Systems; Maritime Transportation; EU regulations; Common Safety Method (CSM); Safety Management System (SMS); risk management

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 9, no. 4
• Strony: 511--520
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 28 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Petrek N.

• Technische Universität Braunschweig, Germany

autor

Berg H. P.

• Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Salzgitter, Germany

Bibliografia

• 1 American Bureau of Shipping (ABS). 2013. Guidance notes on management of change for the marine and offshore industries, Houston, Texas, USA, February 2013.
• 2 Act on the peaceful utilisation of nuclear energy and the protection against its hazards (Atomic Energy Act, Atomgesetz – AtG), 23 December 1959, promulgated on 15 July 1985, last amendment of August 28, 2013.
• 3 Det Norske Veritas (DNV). 2013. Conversion of ships, April 2013.
• 4 DNV‐GL. 2014. Rules for classification, DNVGL‐RU‐0050, General Regulations, Edition October 2014.
• 5 European Commission (EC). 2009a. Commission regulation (EC) NO 352/2009 of 24 April 2009 on the adoption of a common safety method on risk evaluation and assessment as referred to in Article 6(3) (a) of Directive 2004/49/EC of European Parliament and of the Council, April 2009.
• 6 European Commission (EC). 2009b. Directive 2009/71/EURATOM establishing a community framework for the nuclear safety of nuclear installations, June 25, 2009.
• 7 European Commission (EC). 2012. Commission Regulation (EU) No 748/2012 of 3 August 2012 laying down implementing rules for the airworthiness and environmental certification of aircraft and related products, parts and appliances, as well as for the certification of design and production organizations, August 2012.
• 8 European Commission (EC). 2013. Commission Implementing regulation (EU) No 402/2013 of 30 April 2013 on the common safety method for risk evaluation and assessment and repealing Regulation (EC) No 352/2009, April 2013.
• 9 Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) 2015. Safety requirements for nuclear power plants of 22 November 2012, Federal Gazette, AT January 24, 2013 B3, amendment of 3 March 2015, Federal Gazette, AT March, 3rd 2015 B2.
• 10 International Association of Classification Societies (IACS). 2011. Classification societies – what, why and how? June 2011.
• 11 Icelandic Maritime Administration (IMA). 2003. Ship Survey Act No 47/2003.
• 12 International Atomic Energy Agency. 2006. Fundamental Safety Principles. Safety Standards No. SF – 1, 2006.
• 13 International Atomic Energy Agency. 2014. Safety classification of structures systems and components in nuclear power plants. Specific Safety Guide No. SSG‐30, IAEA, Vienna, May 2014.
• 14 International Maritime Organization (IMO). 2013. Revised guidelines for formal safety assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule‐making process. MSC‐MEPC.2/Circ.12, London, United Kingdom.
• 15 Irish Aviation Authority (IAA). 2010. Aircraft Design Changes – Guidance on the approval of modifications and repairs. January 2010.
• 16 Maritime Environment Protection Committee (MEPC). 2011. Resolution MEPC.203 (62), MEPC 62/24/Add., Annex 19, July 2011.
• 17 Ministry of the Environment, Climate Protection and the Energy Sector Baden‐Württemberg (UM BW). 2011. Regulatory Plant Change Procedure (Landeseinheitliches Änderungsverfahren – LEÄV), September 2011.
• 18 Ministry of the Environment, Climate Protection and the Energy Sector Baden‐Württemberg (UM BW). 2013. Concept for regulatory supervision of nuclear power plants in Baden‐Württemberg. June 2013.
• 19 Ordinance on the Procedure for Licensing of Installations under §7 of the Atomic Energy Act (Nuclear Licensing Procedure Ordinance ‐ Atomrechtliche Verfahrensverordnung ‐ AtVfV) of 18 February 1977, promulgated on 3 February 1995, ast amendment of 9 December 2006.
• 20 Petrek, N. 2014a. Konstruktion eines Verfahrens zur Signifikanzbewertung von Änderungen im europäischen Eisenbahnwesen. Ph.D.‐Thesis of the Department of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Environmental Science of the Technische Universität Braunschweig, August 2014.
• 21 Petrek, N. 2014b. A New Approach for Judging the Significance of Changes in European Railways. FORMS/ FORMAT 2014 – 10th Symposium on Formal Methods, September 2014.
• 22 Petrek, N. & Berg, H. P. 2014. Comparing the two methods for judging changes in European railways and in European nuclear safety. In Nowakowski et al. (eds), Safety and Reliability: Methodology and Applications: 1649 – 1654. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
• 23 Petrek, N. & Berg, H.P. 2015. Approaches and regulations regarding significant modifications in transportation and nuclear safety. Safety of marine transport. Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation: 283 – 291, CRC Press.
• 24 Psaraftis, H.N. 2012. Formal safety assessment: an updated review. J Mar Sci Technology, 17(3), 390 –402.
• 25 Senturk, Ö. U. 2011. The interaction between the ship repair, ship conversion and shipbuilding industries, OECD Journal:General Papers, Vol. 2010/3, August 2011.
• 26 VTRANS120200. 2010. Repair, maintenance, modification and conversion of ships and aircraft and their parts: Repair, maintenance, modifications and conversions, Draft November 2010.
• 27 Western European Nuclear Regulators’ Association (WENRA). 2014. Report WENRA safety reference levels for existing reactors, update in relation to lessons learned from TEPCO Fukushima‐Daiichi accident, 24th September 2014.
• 28 Zaman M.B., Santoso A., Kobayashi E., Wakabayashi N., Maimun A. 2015. Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for Analysis of Ship Collision Using AIS Data. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 9, No. 1, 67‐72.