PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Changes in the Use of Agricultural Land in Poland and Czech Republic

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This article raises the issue of changes in the structure of agricultural land use in Poland and the Czech Republic since the accession of both countries into the structures of the European Union. An important question raised in this article is the analysis of changes in the area structure of agricultural holdings according to the adopted agricultural land groups. The analyses were based on the graphic method of analysing the concentration strength, i.e. the Lorenz curve, to determine the distribution of the number and surface area of agricultural farms in the given area groups and the percentage share of such farms in these area groups. Additionally, the Gini coefficient was calculated for the same phenomena, to measure the concentration (inequality) of the random variable distribution. The research showed the structural change trends in the agricultural area of the analysed countries as well as varied structural situation of agricultural holdings during the accession period. The condition translates into a slower pace of structural change of agricultural holdings in Poland and a faster process of enlarging the area of agricultural holdings in the Czech Republic.
Rocznik
Strony
211--221
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 37 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Department of Spatial Economy, ul. Grunwaldzka 55, 50-357 Wrocław, Poland
  • University of Hradec Králové, Faculty of Informatics and Management, Economics Department, Hradecká 1249/6, Hradec Králové, building J, Czech Republic
  • Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Department of Spatial Economy, ul. Grunwaldzka 55, 50-357 Wrocław, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Act of 10th February of 2017 Regulations introducing the Act on the National Support Centre for Agriculture (Journal of Laws of 2017, item 623).
  • 2. Arnold, B.C. 1987. Majorizationand the Lorenz Order. A Brief Introdaction. Lecture Notes in Statistics 43, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • 3. Balej, M., Andel, J. 2008) Land use changes and environmental stress accounting (case study from northwestern part of the Czech-German borderland. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning 2008 Vol. 1(5), pp. 097–109, from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228359648_Land_use_changes_and_environmental_stress_accounting_case_study_from_northwestern_part_of_the_Czech-German_borderland
  • 4. Barnett, R.A, Ziegler, M.R., Byleen, K.E. 2005. College Mathematics R.A. for Business, Economics, Life Sciences, and Social Sciences, 10th ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, 2005.
  • 5. Bičík, I., Štěpánek, V. 1994. Post-war changes of the land-use structure in Bohemia and Moravia: Case study Sudetenland. GeoJournal. Vol. 32. No. 3. p. 253–259, from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01122117
  • 6. Binderman, Z., Koszela, G., Szczesny, W. 2014. Zmiany w strukturze gospodarstw rolnych w krajach Unii Europejskiej w latach 2003–2010 (aspekty metodyczne), [Changes in the structure of agricultural holdings in the European Union in 2003–2010 (methodical aspects)]. Zeszyty Naukowe Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego tom 14 (XXIX). zeszyt 3, 15–26 [In Polish].
  • 7. Binderman, Z., Szczesny, W. 2016. Ocena zmiany w strukturze obszarowej gospodarstw rolnych w Polsce na tle nowych państw UE (aspekty metodyczne), [Assessment of change in the area structure of agricultural holdings in Poland compared to new EU countries (methodological aspects)]. OPITIMUM Studia Ekonomiczne. DOI: 10.1529/ose.2016.02.80.07, [In Polish].
  • 8. Český statistický úřad (CZSO). 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.czso.cz/.
  • 9. Druga, M., Faltan, V. 2014. Influences of environmental drivers on land cover structure and its long-term changes: a case study of the villages of Malachov and Podkonice in Slovakia. Moravian Geographical Reports Vol. 22, 3/2014, from: https://www.geonika.cz/EN/research/ENMGRClanky/2014_3_DRUGA.pdf
  • 10. European Statistical Office. Farm Structure Survey. Available from: www.ec.europa.eu/eurostat.
  • 11. Environmental Protection. Environment. 2014. Central Statistical Office in Poland (GUS). Warszawa.
  • 12. Farm Structure Survey. Retrieved from www.ec.europa.eu/eurostat.
  • 13. Faltejsková, O., Dvořáková, L., Hotovcová, B. 2016. Net promoter score integration into the enterprise performance measurement and management system – a way to performance methods development. E&M Economics and Management, volume XIX, 1/2016, 93–106. DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2016–1-007
  • 14. Glasser, G.J. 2012. Variance Formulas for the Mean Difference and Coefficient of Concentration. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2012 57:299, 648–654, DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1962.1 0500553
  • 15. Główny Urząd Statystyczny w Polsce (GUS). 2016. Central Statistical Office in Poland (GUS) Retrieved, from: http://www.gus.pl/
  • 16. Hietel, E., Waldhardt, R., Otte, A. 2005. Linking socio-economic factors. Environment and land cover in the German Highlands. 1945–1999. Journal of Environmental Management. Vol. 75. No. 2., p. 133–143, from: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr2014–0016
  • 17. Hełdak, M., Stacherzak, A., Kucher, A. 2017. Analysis of the changes in transaction prices of agricultural land in Poland. Hradec Economic Days 7 2017 p. 287–295, from: http://fim2.uhk.cz/hed/data/proceedings_17.pdf
  • 18. Hoffmann, L.D. and Bradley, G.L. 2007. Calculus for Business, Economics, and L.D. the Social and Life Sciences, 9th ed., McGraw Hill, New York, 2007.
  • 19. Gastwirth, J.L. (1971). A general definitione of the Lorenz curve. Econometrica, 39. from: https://econpapers.repec.org/article/ecmemetrp/v_3a39_3ay_3a1971_3ai_3a6_3ap_3a1037–39.htm
  • 20. Glasser, G.J., 1962. Variance formulas for the mean difference and coefficient of concentration. J. Am. Statistic. Assoc. 57, 648–654. DOI: 10.1080/01621 459.1962.10500553
  • 21. Jarmołowicz, W., Piatek, D. 2013. Economy of Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary after 20 years of transition. Transformation in Business & Economics 12(2B), 293–304.
  • 22. Križan, F., Biliková, K., Kita, P., Siviček T. 2016. Transformation of retailing in post-communist Slovakia in the cintext of globalization. E&M Economics and Management, volume XIX, 1/2016, 148–164, DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2016–1-011
  • 23. Lerman, Z., Csaki, C., Feder, G. 2002. Land Policies and Evolving Farm structures in Transition Countries. Policy Research Working Paper 2794. The World Bank Development, from: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/885151468746704912/120520322_20041117152044/additional/multi0page.pdf
  • 24. Lipský, Z. 1995. The changing face of the Czech rural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning. Vol. 31. No. 1–3. p. 39–45, from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0169–2046(94)01036–8
  • 25. Lorincz, R., Balazs, K. 2003. Historical land use analysis and landscape development investigations for devising sustainable land use structure. In Mander, Ű., Antrop, M. [eds.]: Multifunctional Landscapes Volume III. Continuity and Change. Southhampton. Boston. WIT Press. pp. 243–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgr-2013–0004
  • 26. Opršal, Z., Šarapatka, B., Kladivoz, P. 2013. Landuse changes and their relationships to selected landscape parameters in three cadastral areas in Moravia (Czech Republic). Moravian Geographical Reports. Vol. 21. 1/2013. p. 41–50, from: https://www.geonika.cz/EN/research/ENMGRClanky/2013_1_OPRSAL.pdf
  • 27. Pawlak, K., Poczta, W. 2010. Potencjał polskiego rolnictwa pięć lat po akcesji do UE jako przesłanka jego konkurencyjności [Potential of Polish agriculture five years after the accession to the EU as a condition of its competitiveness], Wieś i rolnictwo. Nr 1(146)2010, from: http://kwartalnik.irwirpan.waw.pl/dir_upload/photo/d30ffb488c2f3bcf8606eb601a63.pdf [In Polish].
  • 28. Prutis, S. (2006). Struktury gospodarcze państwowej własności rolniczej [Economic structures of state agricultural property], [w:] Prawo rolne. A. Stelmachowski (red.). Warszawa 2006, pp. 205 [In Polish].
  • 29. Poczta, W., Kołodziejczak, M. 2004. Potencjał produkcyjny rolnictwa polskiego i efektywność gospodarowania w aspekcie integracji z Unią Europejską, [The production potential of Polish agriculture and the effectiveness of management in the aspect of integration with the European Union], Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej w Poznaniu. Poznań [In Polish].
  • 30. Poczta W. (red.). 2013. Gospodarstwa rolne w Polsce na tle gospodarstw Unii Europejskiej – wpływ WPR [Agricultural holdings in Poland against the background of EU farms – the impact of WPR]. Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Warszawa, from: https://stat.gov.pl/cps/rde/xbcr/gus/RL_Gospodarstwa_rolne_na_tle_internet.pdf [In Polish],
  • 31. Rumpel, P., Slach, O., Koutsky, J. 2013. Shrinking cities and governance of economic regeneration: The case of Ostrava. E&M Economics and Management, volume 16(2), 113–128.
  • 32. Urbšiene, L. 2013. The impact of globalisation to transitional economies: Evidence for Lithuania. Transformation in Business & Economics 12(1), 140–162, from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289769165_The_impact_of_globalisation_to_transitional_economies_Evidence_for_lithuania
  • 33. Sadowski, A. 2009. Własność a użytkowanie gruntów rolnych. Zarys tendencji rozwojowych [Ownership and use of agricultural land. Outline of development trends], Białystok, pp. 300.
  • 34. Sarris, A.H., Doucha, T., Mathijs, E. 1999. Agricultural restructuring in central and eastern Europe: implications for competitiveness and rural development. European Review of Agricultural economics 26 (3), from: ftp://ftp.soc.uoc.gr/students/niksem/com_4sarris.pdf
  • 35. Swinnen, J.F.M. 2001. Implications of EU enlargement for Agri-food Markets and Policy. Materials for the conference Outlook for Agriculture. Agribusiness and the Food Industry in Central and Eastern Europe at Budapest 18th of May 2001. Hungary.
  • 36. Zegar, J.St. 2013. Kwestia bezpieczeństwa żywnościowego a ekonomia [The issue of food security and economics], IX Kongres Ekonomistów Polskich. Warszawa [In Polish].
  • 37. Zawistowski, Z.J., Szczesny, W., Borkowski, B., Kozera, R., Shachmurove, Y. 2016. Alternative Method of Measuring Concentration, Appl. Math. Inf. Sci. 10, No. 1, 11–19.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-ac1f293f-c133-4ecf-99d7-beff41f96aa7
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.