Tytuł artykułu
Treść / Zawartość
Pełne teksty:
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
This article addresses selected technical and organization aspects of risk mitigation in the oil port installations with regard to functional safety requirements specified in standards IEC 61508 and IEC 61511. The procedure for functional safety management includes the hazard identification, risk analysis and assessment, specification of overall safety requirements and definition of safety functions. Based on risk assessment results the safety integrity level (SIL) is determined for consecutive safety functions. These functions are implemented within industrial control system (ICS) that consists of the basic process control system (BPCS) and/or safety instrumented system (SIS). Determination of required SIL related to required risk mitigation is based on semi-quantitative evaluation method. Verification of SIL for considered architectures of BPCS and/or SIS is supported by probabilistic models with appropriate data and model parameters including security-related aspects. The approach proposed is illustrated on example of oil port installations. In final part of the article the insurance aspects are discussed in managing risks, as some risks are to be transferred to an insurance company.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
147--156
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 27 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland
autor
- Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland
autor
- Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland
autor
- PZU Group, Warsaw, Poland
Bibliografia
- [1] Barnert, T., Kosmowski, K.T. & Śliwiński, M. (2010). Integrated functional safety and security analysis of process control and protection systems with regard to uncertainty issues. Proceedings of PSAM 10, Seattle.
- [2] Barnert, T., Kosmowski, K.T. & Śliwiński, M. (2010). A method for including the security aspects in the functional safety analysis of distributed control and protection systems. Proc. ESREL, Rhodes, Greece.
- [3] Barnert, T. & Śliwiński, M. (2013). Functional safety and information security in the critical infrastructure objects and systems (in Polish), Modern communication and data transfer systems for safety and security. Wolters Kluwer, 476-507.
- [4] CCPS (2008). Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures. New York: Center for Chemical Process Safety. Wiley-Interscience, A John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
- [5] Goble, W. & Cheddie, H. (2005). Safety instrumented systems verification: Practical probabilistic calculations. ISA.
- [6] Gołębiewski, D. & Kosmowski, K.T. (2005). Risk analysis for insurance of technical systems. ESREL, Advances in Safety and Reliability (ed. Kołowrocki), A.A. Balkema Publishers, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 683-687.
- [7] Gołębiewski, D. (2010). Insurance Audit, Practical methods of risk analysis (in Polish). Poltext Publishers, Warsaw.
- [8] Goslin, Ch. (2008). Maritime and port security. Duos Technologies, Inc., Jacksonville.
- [9] Grøtan, T.O., Jaatun, M.G., Øien, K., et al. (2007). The SeSa Method for Assesing Secure Remote Access to Safety Instrumented Systems (SINTEF A1626). Trondheim, Norway.
- [10] Hildebrandt, P. (2000). Critical aspects of safety, availability and communication in the control of a subsea gas pipeline, Requirements and Solutions HIMA.
- [11] IAEA (2015). Development and implementation of a process based management system. Nuclear Energy Series Report NG-T-1.3. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.
- [12] IEC 61508 (2010). Functional Safety of Electrical/Electronic/Programmable Electronic Safety-Related Systems, Parts 1-7. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
- [13] IEC 61511 (2015). Functional safety: Safety Instrumented Systems for the Process Industry Sector. Parts 1-3. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
- [14] IEC 62443 (2013). Security for industrial automation and control systems. Parts 1-13 (undergoing development). International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
- [15] ISO/IEC 15408 (1999). Information technology Security techniques – Evaluation criteria for IT security. Part 1-3. International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
- [16] ISO 31000 (2009). Risk management - Principles and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
- [17] Kosmowski, K. T., Śliwiński, M. & Barnert, T. (2006). Functional safety and security assessment of the control and protection systems. Proc. European Safety & Reliability Conference – ESREL, Estoril. Taylor & Francis Group, London.
- [18] Kosmowski, K. T. (2013). Functional safety and reliability analysis methodology for hazardous industrial plants. Gdańsk University of Technology Publishers.
- [19] Mahan, R. E., et al. (2011). Secure Data Transfer Guidance for Industrial Control and SCADA Systems. PNNL-20776, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland.
- [20] Missala, T. (2010). Book of procedures for functional safety compliance evaluation of protection systems in the process industry. Report no. 8795, PIAP, Warsaw.
- [21] Muhlbauer, K. (2004). Pipeline Risk Management Manual Ideas, Techniques, and Resources, Third edition, Elsevier.
- [22] Piesik, E. & Śliwiński, M. (2015). Human reliability analysis with the alarm management aspects (in Polish), The Scientific Papers of Faculty Electrical and Control Engineering. Gdańsk University of Technology Publishers, 47, 143-146.
- [23] Piwowar, J., Chatelet, E. & Laclemence, P. (2009). An efficient process to reduce infrastructure vulnerabilities facing malevolence, Reliability Elsevier, Engineering and System Safety 94, 1869–1877.
- [24] SESAMO (2014). Integrated Design and Evaluation Methodology. Security and Safety modelling. Artemis JU Grant Agr. no. 2295354.
- [25] Spouge, J. (1999). A Guide to quantitative risk assessment for offshore installations, DNV Technica.
- [26] Śliwiński, M., Kosmowski, K. T. & Piesik, E. (2015). Verification of the safety integrity levels with regard of information security issues (in Polish), Advanced Systems for Automation and Diagnostics, PWNT, Gdańsk.
- [27] UN (2006). Maritime security: elements of an analytical framework for compliance measurement and risk assessment. United Nations, New York and Geneva.
Uwagi
Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-abdc5fc7-9ede-418c-94f3-b88b3abb45b1