Zmienność sezonowa glonów planktonowych rozwijających się w wodach stawów zlokalizowanych w Parku Habsburgów w Żywcu

• Autorzy: Jachniak Ewa

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.53052/pjmee.2022.4.01

Warianty tytułu

EN

Seasonal variability of planktonic algae developing in water of ponds located in the Habsburg Park in Żywiec

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this research was to characterize the species structure and biomass of planktonic algae in the ponds of the Habsburg Park in Żywiec. This research was conducted in the 2018 vegetation season. The water samples for research were taken from two research points. The first research point was located in the north-west part of the park, in a sunny place, while the second research point was located in the south-eastern part of the park, in a shaded place. The phytoplankton biomass (given in wet mass) was calculated by comparing the phytoplankton organisms to geometric figures, and then measuring their volume. A special converter was used to convert volume to mass. Algae keys were used to identify planktonic algae species. The results of the conducted analyzes showed the variability of the phytoplankton biomass in the research season. The highest values of total planktonic algae biomass were recorded in the summer period, in turn, the lowest values were recorded in the spring and autumn periods at both research points. The following groups of planktonic algae were found on both research points: Bacillariophyceae, Chrysophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Cryptophyceae and Euglenophyceae. The conducted research showed that diatoms (59.6% share) and green algae (22.5% share) had the highest average percentage share in the total phytoplankton biomass on the first research point, whereas on the second research point the diatoms (66% share) and euglenins (15.3% share) had the highest average percentage share in the total phytoplankton biomass. The greatest species diversity was found among diatoms and green algae, in the remaining algae groups only two or three species of algae dominated. During the research, algae that prefer low fertile water were observed (e.g. Encyonema minutum (Hilse) D.G. Mann, Pinnularia sp.) and that prefer more fertile environments (e.g. Coelastrum astroideum De-Not., Aulacoseira granulata (Ehr.) Simonsen. Some of them belonged to ubiquitous algae, typical for various environments, e.g. Cryptomonas erosa and Ulnaria ulna (Nitzsch) Ehrenberg.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

glony planktonowe; staw parkowy; biomasa

EN

planktonic algae; park ponds; biomass

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Bielsko-Bialskiego
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Materials and Environmental Engineering
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 4 (24)
• Strony: 1--12
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Jachniak Ewa

• University of Bielsko-Biala, Department of Environmental Protection and Engineering, Willowa 2, 43-309 Bielsko-Biała, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2444-8999

Bibliografia

• 1. Bubíková K., Hrivnák R. 2018. Comparative macrophyte diversity of waterbodies in the Central Euro-pean landscape. Wetlands, 38, 451–459.
• 2. Bukacińska M., Bukaciński D., Cygan J.P., Dobrowolski K.A., Kaczmarek W. 1995. Przyrodniczo-ekonomiczna waloryzacja stawów rybnych w Polsce. Fundacja IUCN Poland, Warszawa.
• 3. Burchardt L., Messyasz B., Stępniak A. 2006. Diversity of phytoplankton community in Borusa and Grundela ponds. Teka Komisji Ochrony Kształtowania Środowiska Przyrodniczego, 3, 35–40.
• 4. Caffrey J.M., Coyne J., Gallagher T. 2008. Ponds of the Phoenix Park. Current ecological status and future management. Central Fisheries Board. Witryna internetowa https://phoenixpark.ie/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/ponds-of-the-phoenix-park-current-ecological-status-and-future-management.pdf.
• 5. Cieśla M., Śliwiński J., Wojda R. 2008. Opracowanie szczegółowych założeń programu działań wod-nośrodowiskowych w gospodarce rybackiej. Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w War-szawie, Warszawa.
• 6. Cox E.J. 1999. Identification of freshwater diatoms from live material. Chapman and Hall, London.
• 7. Fernández C., Estrada V., Parodi E.R. 2015. Factors triggering Cyanobacteria dominance and suc-cession during blooms in a hypereutrophic drinking water supply reservoir. Water, Air & Soil Pol-lution, 226, 73, 1–13.
• 8. Gąbka M., Dolata P.T. 2010. Rare and endangered communities of the hydrophyte in fish ponds in southern Wielkopolska. Physiographic Research, ser. B – Bot., 01, B59, 75–96.
• 9. Hindák F. 1996. Key to the unbranched filamentous green algae (Ulotrichineae, Ulotrichales, Chloro-phyceae). Bulletin Slovenskej Botanickej Spoločnosti Pri Sav, Supplement 1. Slovenska Botan-icka Spoločnost Pri Sav, Bratislava.
• 10. Hutorowicz A., Pasztaleniec A. 2020. Fitoplankton w jeziorach. [W:] Podręcznik do monitoringu ele-mentów biologicznych i klasyfikacji stanu ekologicznego wód powierzchniowych. Aktualizacja me-tod (red. A. Kolada). Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska, Warszawa, 221–241.
• 11. Iwaszuk E., Rudik G., Duin L., Mederake L., Davis M.K., Naumann S., Wagner I. 2019. Błękitno-zielona infrastruktura dla łagodzenia zmian klimatu w miastach – katalog techniczny. Ecologic In-stitute, Fundacja Sendzimira, Berlin – Kraków.
• 12. Jachniak E., Młyniuk A. 2019. The variability of the planktonic algae biomass and their species struc-ture in the ponds of the Park and Palace Complex in Żywiec. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20, 7, 53–60.
• 13. Jurczak T., Wojtal-Frankiewicz A., Kaczkowski Z., Oleksińska Z., Bednarek A., Zalewski M. 2018. Restoration of a shady urban pond – The pros and cons. Journal of Environmental Management, 217, 919–928.
• 14. Kawecka B., Eloranta P.V. 1994. Zarys ekologii glonów wód słodkich I środowisk lądowych. PWN, Warszawa.
• 15. Lund J.W.G., Kipling C., Le Gren E.D. 1958. The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimation by counting. Hydrobiologia, 1, 144–170.
• 16. Messyasz B., Jurgońska M. 2003. Species structure of the phytoplankton in the annual cycle in large and small ponds (Park Sołacki, Poznań). Annals of the Agricultural Academy in Poznan – CCCLIV Bot., 6, 131–145.
• 17. Miodoński M. 2012. Three days in Żywiec: a guide for a walking tourist. Żywia, Żywiec.
• 18. Mukhutdinov V.F., Butakova E.A. 2012. Production characteristics of phytoplankton in early years of the existence of Yumaguzin Reservoir. Inland Water Biology, 5, 4, 317–321.
• 19. Nishino H., Hodoki Y., Thottathil S.D., Ohbayashi K., Takao Y., Nakano S. 2015. Identification of spe-cies and genotypic compositions of Cryptomonas (Cryptophyceae) populations in the eutrophic Lake Hira, Japan, using single-cell PCR. Aquatic Ecology, 49, 263–272.
• 20. Pajchrowska M., Szpakowska B. 2014. Assessment of occurrence microphytes and trophic status of a small water body in the Wielkopolska Region (Western Poland). Polish Journal of Natural Sciences, 29, 1, 17–33.
• 21. Peretyatko A., Teissier S., Symoens J-J., Triest L. 2007. Phytoplankton biomass and environmental factors over a gradient of clear to turbid peri-urban ponds. Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 17, 584–601.
• 22. Picińska-Fałtynowicz J., Błachuta J. 2012. Klucz do identyfikacji organizmów fitoplanktonowych z rzek i jezior dla celów badań monitoringowych części wód powierzchniowych w Polsce. Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska, Warszawa.
• 23. Rott E. 1981. Some results from phytoplankton counting intercalibrations. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Hydrologie, 43, 1, 34–62.
• 24. Saha S., Saha T., Basul P. 2017. Seasonal changes in zooplankton and macro-fauna populations of the East Calcutta Wetland Fish Ponds. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, 70, 2, 156–164.
• 25. Sipaúba-Tavares L.H., Donadon A.R.V., Milan R.N. 2011. Water quality and plankton populations in an earthen polyculture pond. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 71, 4, 845–855.
• 26. Słomka T., Słomka E. 2007. Geotouristic and tourist attractions of Żywiec. Geotourism, 4, 11, 13–22.
• 27. Starmach J., Mazurkiewicz-Boroń G. 2000. Zbiornik Dobczycki. Ekologia – Eutrofizacja – Ochrona. Zakład Biologii Wód im. Karola Starmacha PAN, Kraków.
• 28. Starmach K. 1989. Plankton roślinny wód słodkich. Metody badania i klucze do oznaczania gatunków występujących w wodach Europy Środkowej. PWN, Warszawa – Kraków.
• 29. Starostwo Powiatowe w Żywcu 2013. Strategia zrównoważonego rozwoju społeczno-gospodarczego Powiatu Żywieckiego na lata 2006–2020. Aktualizacja.
• 30. Surajit M., Monij P., Sulogna B., Sunirmal K., Dipankar S. 2019. A study of plankton diversity of some ponds of Bankura Town, West Bengal, India. Environment and Ecology, 37, 4, 1115–1123.
• 31. Wang Q., Yang X., Kattel G.R. 2018. Within-lake spatio-temporal dynamics of cladoceran and diatom communities in a deep subtropical mountain lake (Lugu Lake) in southwest China. Hydrobiologia, 820, 91–113.
• 32. Water Resource Services INC. 2017. Comprehensive pond management plan for eight ponds in Wellesley, Massachusetts.
• 33. Wilk-Woźniak E., Ligęza S. 2003. Phytoplankton – nutrient relationships during the early spring and the late autumn in a shallow and polluted reservoir. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 32, 1, 75–87.
• 34. Wilk-Woźniak E., Pociecha A., Ciszewski D., Aleksander-Kwaterczak U., Walusiak E. 2011. Phyto- and zooplankton in fishponds contaminated with heavy metal runoff from a lead-zinc mine. Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, 40, 4, 77–85.
• 35. Żywotko H. 2000. Guide: the trees of the historic Habsburg Park in Żywiec. Publishing House Henryk Żywotko, Żywiec.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).