Machine Learning Algorithms for Data Enrichment: A Promising Solution for Enhancing Accuracy in Predicting Blast-Induced Ground Vibration in Open-Pit Mines

• Autorzy: Nguyen Hoang , Bui Xuan-Nam , Drebenstedt Carsten

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29227/IM-2023-02-15

Warianty tytułu

PL

Algorytmy uczenia maszynowego do wzbogacania danych: obiecujące rozwiązanie zwiększające dokładność przewidywania wibracji gruntu wywołanych wybuchem w kopalniach odkrywkowych

• Konferencja: POL-VIET 2023 — the 7th International Conference POL-VIET
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The issue of blast-induced ground vibration poses a significant environmental challenge in open-pit mines, necessitating precise prediction and control measures. While artificial intelligence and machine learning models hold promise in addressing this concern, their accuracy remains a notable issue due to constrained input variables, dataset size, and potential environmental impact. To mitigate these challenges, data enrichment emerges as a potential solution to enhance the efficacy of machine learning models, not only in blast-induced ground vibration prediction but also across various domains within the mining industry. This study explores the viability of utilizing machine learning for data enrichment, with the objective of generating an augmented dataset that offers enhanced insights based on existing data points for the prediction of blast-induced ground vibration. Leveraging the support vector machine (SVM), we uncover intrinsic relationships among input variables and subsequently integrate them as supplementary inputs. The enriched dataset is then harnessed to construct multiple machine learning models, including k-nearest neighbors (KNN), classification and regression trees (CART), and random forest (RF), all designed to predict blast-induced ground vibration. Comparative analysis between the enriched models and their original counterparts, established on the initial dataset, provides a foundation for extracting insights into optimizing the performance of machine learning models not only in the context of predicting blast-induced ground vibration but also in addressing broader challenges within the mining industry.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

blast-induced ground vibration; data enrichment; sustainable and responsible mining; machine learning; open-pit mining; performance improvement

PL

górnictwo odkrywkowe; sztuczna inteligencja; maszyny

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Przeróbki Kopalin
• Czasopismo: Inżynieria Mineralna
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: no. 2, vol. 1
• Strony: 79--88
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 52 poz., rys., tab., wykr., zdj.

Twórcy

autor

Nguyen Hoang

• Surface Mining Department, Mining Faculty, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
• Innovations for Sustainable and Responsible Mining (ISRM) Research Group, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam

autor

Bui Xuan-Nam

• Surface Mining Department, Mining Faculty, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
• Innovations for Sustainable and Responsible Mining (ISRM) Research Group, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam

autor

Drebenstedt Carsten

• TU Bergakademie Freiberg, 09596 Freiberg, Sachen, Germany

Bibliografia

• 1. Abbaszadeh, S.A. and R. Asheghi, Optimized developed artificial neural network-based models to predict the blast-induced ground vibration. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2018. 3: p. 1-10.
• 2. Ainalis, D., et al., Modelling the source of blasting for the numerical simulation of blast-induced ground vibrations: a review. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2017. 50(1): p. 171-193.
• 3. Monjezi, M., et al., Predicting blast-induced ground vibration using various types of neural networks. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010. 30(11): p. 1233-1236.
• 4. Marks, N.A., et al., Airblast variability and fatality risks from a VBIED in a complex urban environment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2021. 209: p. 107459.
• 5. Stewart, M.G. and M.D. Netherton, A probabilistic risk-acceptance model for assessing blast and fragmentation safety hazards. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2019. 191: p. 106492.
• 6. Gerassis, S., et al., Understanding complex blasting operations: A structural equation model combining Bayesian networks and latent class clustering. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2019. 188: p. 195-204.
• 7. Nguyen, H., et al., Predicting Blast-Induced Ground Vibration in Open-Pit Mines Using Different Nature-Inspired Optimization Algorithms and Deep Neural Network. Natural Resources Research, 2021. 30(6): p. 4695-4717.
• 8. Nicholls, H.R., C.F. Johnson, and W.I. Duvall, Blasting vibrations and their effects on structures. 1971: US Government Printers.
• 9. Murmu, S., P. Maheshwari, and H.K. Verma, Empirical and probabilistic analysis of blast-induced ground vibrations. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2018. 103: p. 267-274.
• 10. Mesec, J., I. Kovač, and B. Soldo, Estimation of particle velocity based on blast event measurements at different rock units. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010. 30(10): p. 1004-1009.
• 11. Ak, H., et al., Evaluation of ground vibration effect of blasting operations in a magnesite mine. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2009. 29(4): p. 669-676.
• 12. Monjezi, M., M. Hasanipanah, and M. Khandelwal, Evaluation and prediction of blast-induced ground vibration at Shur River Dam, Iran, by artificial neural network. Neural Computing and Applications, 2013. 22(7): p. 1637-1643.
• 13. Saadat, M., M. Khandelwal, and M. Monjezi, An ANN-based approach to predict blast-induced ground vibration of Gol-E-Gohar iron ore mine, Iran. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2014. 6(1): p. 67-76.
• 14. Hasanipanah, M., et al., Feasibility of indirect determination of blast induced ground vibration based on support vector machine. Measurement, 2015. 75: p. 289-297.
• 15. Amiri, M., et al., A new combination of artificial neural network and K-nearest neighbors models to predict blast-induced ground vibration and air-overpressure. Engineering with Computers, 2016. 32(4): p. 631-644.
• 16. Azimi, Y., S.H. Khoshrou, and M. Osanloo, Prediction of blast induced ground vibration (BIGV) of quarry mining using hybrid genetic algorithm optimized artificial neural network. Measurement, 2019. 147: p. 106874.
• 17. Shang, Y., et al., A Novel Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predict Blast-Induced Ground Vibration in Open-Pit Mines Based on the Firefly Algorithm and Artificial Neural Network. Natural Resources Research, 2020. 29(2): p. 723-737.
• 18. Zhang, X., et al., Novel Soft Computing Model for Predicting Blast-Induced Ground Vibration in Open-Pit Mines Based on Particle Swarm Optimization and XGBoost. Natural Resources Research, 2020. 29(2): p. 711-721.
• 19. Qiu, Y., et al., Performance evaluation of hybrid WOA-XGBoost, GWO-XGBoost and BO-XGBoost models to predict blast-induced ground vibration. Engineering with Computers, 2021.
• 20. Bui, X.-N., H.-B. Bui, and H. Nguyen. A Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Mining and Geological Engineering. in Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovations for Sustainable and Responsible Mining. 2021. Springer.
• 21. Jung, D. and Y. Choi, Systematic review of machine learning applications in mining: Exploration, exploitation, and reclamation. Minerals, 2021. 11(2): p. 148.
• 22. Kim, M., L. Ismail, and S. Kwon, Review of the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Blasting Area. Explosives and Blasting, 2021. 39(3): p. 44-64.
• 23. Yong, W., et al., Analysis and prediction of diaphragm wall deflection induced by deep braced excavations using finite element method and artificial neural network optimized by metaheuristic algorithms. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022. 221: p. 108335.
• 24. Liu, D., S. Wang, and X. Cui, An artificial neural network supported Wiener process based reliability estimation method considering individual difference and measurement error. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022. 218: p. 108162.
• 25. Yang, Z., P. Baraldi, and E. Zio, A method for fault detection in multi-component systems based on sparse autoencoder-based deep neural networks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022. 220: p. 108278.
• 26. Seo, S.-K., et al., Deep neural network-based optimization framework for safety evacuation route during toxic gas leak incidents. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2022. 218: p. 108102.
• 27. Zhou, J., et al., Developing a hybrid model of Jaya algorithm-based extreme gradient boosting machine to estimate blast-induced ground vibrations. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2021. 145: p. 104856.
• 28. Lawal, A.I., et al., Blast-induced ground vibration prediction in granite quarries: An application of gene expression programming, ANFIS, and sine cosine algorithm optimized ANN. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2021. 31(2): p. 265-277.
• 29. Zhu, W., H.N. Rad, and M. Hasanipanah, A chaos recurrent ANFIS optimized by PSO to predict ground vibration generated in rock blasting. Applied Soft Computing, 2021. 108: p. 107434.
• 30. Zhang, X., et al., Novel Extreme Learning Machine-Multi-Verse Optimization Model for Predicting Peak Particle Velocity Induced by Mine Blasting. Natural Resources Research, 2021. 30(6): p. 4735-4751.
• 31. Armaghani, D.J., et al., A novel approach for forecasting of ground vibrations resulting from blasting: modified particle swarm optimization coupled extreme learning machine. Engineering with computers, 2021. 37(4): p. 3221-3235.
• 32. Arthur, C.K., V.A. Temeng, and Y.Y. Ziggah, A Self-adaptive differential evolutionary extreme learning machine (SaDEELM): a novel approach to blast-induced ground vibration prediction. SN Applied Sciences, 2020. 2(11): p. 1845.
• 33. Ding, X., et al., Predicting the blast-induced vibration velocity using a bagged support vector regression optimized with firefly algorithm. Engineering with Computers, 2020: p. 1-12.
• 34. Nguyen, H., X.-N. Bui, and E. Topal, Reliability and availability artificial intelligence models for predicting blast-induced ground vibration intensity in open-pit mines to ensure the safety of the surroundings. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2023. 231: p. 109032.
• 35. Syarif, I., et al. Application of bagging, boosting and stacking to intrusion detection. in Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition: 8th International Conference, MLDM 2012, Berlin, Germany, July 13-20, 2012. Proceedings 8. 2012. Springer.
• 36. Graczyk, M., et al. Comparison of bagging, boosting and stacking ensembles applied to real estate appraisal. in Intelligent Information and Database Systems: Second International Conference, ACIIDS, Hue City, Vietnam, March 24-26, 2010. Proceedings, Part II 2. 2010. Springer.
• 37. Wolpert, D.H. and W.G. Macready, Combining stacking with bagging to improve a learning algorithm. Santa Fe Institute, Technical Report, 1996. 30.
• 38. Cortes, C. and V. Vapnik, Support vector machine. Machine learning, 1995. 20(3): p. 273-297.
• 39. Basak, D., S. Pal, and D.C. Patranabis, Support vector regression. Neural Information Processing-Letters and Reviews, 2007. 11(10): p. 203-224.
• 40. Altman, N.S., An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. The American Statistician, 1992. 46(3): p. 175-185.
• 41. Song, Y., et al., An efficient instance selection algorithm for k nearest neighbor regression. Neurocomputing, 2017. 251: p. 26-34.
• 42. Chae, D.-K., et al., On identifying k-nearest neighbors in neighborhood models for efficient and effective collaborative filtering. Neurocomputing, 2018. 278: p. 134-143.
• 43. Bui, X.-N., et al., A novel Hybrid Model for predicting Blast-induced Ground Vibration Based on k-nearest neighbors and particle Swarm optimization. Scientific reports, 2019. 9(1): p. 1-14.
• 44. Hu, C., et al., Data-driven method based on particle swarm optimization and k-nearest neighbor regression for estimating capacity of lithium-ion battery. Applied Energy, 2014. 129: p. 49-55.
• 45. Khandelwal, M., et al., Classification and regression tree technique in estimating peak particle velocity caused by blasting. Engineering with Computers, 2017. 33(1): p. 45-53.
• 46. Myles, A.J., et al., An introduction to decision tree modeling. Journal of Chemometrics, 2004. 18(6): p. 275-285.
• 47. Pradhan, B., A comparative study on the predictive ability of the decision tree, support vector machine and neuro-fuzzy models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS. Computers & Geosciences, 2013. 51: p. 350-365.
• 48. Breiman, L., et al., Classification and decision trees. Wadsworth, Belmont, 1984. 378.
• 49. Breiman, L., Random forests. Machine learning, 2001. 45(1): p. 5-32.
• 50. Effron, B. and R.J. Tibshirani, An introduction to the bootstrap. Monographs on statistics and applied probability, 1993. 57: p. 436.
• 51. Breiman, L., Random forests. UC Berkeley TR567, 1999.
• 52. Nguyen, H., et al., Developing an XGBoost model to predict blast-induced peak particle velocity in an open-pit mine: a case study. Acta Geophysica, 2019. 67(2): p. 477-490.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu „Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki” - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)