PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Conflicts in contemporary Asia – theoretical approach

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The article attempts to theoretically systematize conflicts in contemporary Asia. At the beginning, attention was paid to the cultural and civilizational determinants of disputes and tensions in the region, which have a direct impact on the sphere of political activity of individual states. It has been found that ethnic and religious heterogeneity is the cause of tensions in Asia in most cases. The critical role of the United States in creating new security architecture across the Asian region has been determined. At the same time, it has been emphasized that multifaceted diversity is not always at odds with conflict-free development and stability. The exemplification of this hypothesis is Malaysia – a country of three cultures (Islamic, Chinese and Hindu). This country gives an example for the whole Asia that diversity does not mean the fatalism of internal conflicts. Malaysia can be an inspiration, especially for the Islamic civilizational circle.
Twórcy
autor
  • Warsaw Uprising Museum, Warsaw, Poland
Bibliografia
  • Arif, Z.M. (1995). Islamic Culture as an Essential Component of a Comprehensive Approach to Development: Some Lessons from the Malaysian ‘Miracle’. Intellectual Discourse, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 123-138.
  • Ayoob, M. (1999). From Regional System to Regional Society: Exploring Key Variables in the Construction of Regional Order. Australian Journal of International Affairs, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 247-260.
  • Baker, J.A. III. (1991). America in Asia: Emerging Architecture for a Pacific Community. Foreign Affairs, no. 92, pp. 1-18.
  • Ball, D. (1993-1994). Arms and Influence: Military Acquisitions in the Asia-Pacific Region. International Security, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 78-112.
  • Beeson, M. and Li, F. (2012). The Rise of China and the Regional Responses in the Asia-Pacific. Journal of Contemporary China, vol. 21, no. 73, pp. 35-51.
  • Brewster, D. (2010). The India-Japan Security Relationship: An Enduring Security Partnership. Asian Security, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 95-120.
  • Brzezinski, Z. (2013). America's role as a stabiliser in Asia, [online]. Published: 23 February, 2013. Available at: https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1156410/americas-role-stabiliser-asia [Accessed: 19 July 2018].
  • Buzan, B. (1998). The Asia Pacific: What Sort of Region in What Sort of World. In: McGrew, A. (ed.), Asia Pacific in the new world order. London [et al.]: Routledge [et al.].
  • Cagnat, R. (2010). Asie centrale, jouet des grandes puissances: le Très Grand Jeu, [online]. Les Notes de L’IRIS, Décembre 2010, Institut de Relations Internationales et Stratégiques, Paris. Available at: http://www.iris-france.org/docs/kfm_docs/docs/2010-12-asie-centrale-fr.pdf [Accessed: 20 July 2018].
  • Case, W.F. (1996). Can the “Halfway House” Stand? Semidemocracy and Elite Theory in Three Southeast Asian Countries. Comparative Politics, vol. 28, no. 4, 437-464.
  • Christou, A. and Mavroudi, E. (ed.). (2015). Dismantling diasporas. Rethinking the geographies of diasporic identity, connection and development. Farnham, Surrey, UK; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  • Dahal, S.H., Gazdar, H., Keethaponcalan, S.I. and Murthy, P. (2003). Internal conflict and regional security in South Asia. Approaches, perspectives and policies. Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research.
  • Dent, C.M. (2008). East Asian regionalism. London: Routledge.
  • Diamond, L., Plattner, M.F. and Chu, Y-h. (2013). Democracy in East Asia. A new century. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Friedberg, A.L. (1993-1994). Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia. International Security, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 5-33.
  • Frost, E.L. (2008). Asia's new regionalism. Boulder, Colo. [et al.]: Rienner.
  • Gawlikowski, K. (2003). Poglady Mahathira bin Mohammada. Res Publica Nova, no. 3.
  • Goh, E. (2007). Southeast Asian perspectives on the China challenge. Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 30, no. 4-5, pp. 809-832.
  • Guillard, O. (2012). L’Australie et le “siècle de l’Asie”: opportunités, risques et défis. Asie Perspectives Strategiques, no. 2.
  • Halizak, E. (1999). Stosunki miedzynarodowe w regionie Azji i Pacyfiku. Warszawa: Scholar.
  • Haneef, M.A. (2001). Islam and economic development in Malaysia – a reappraisal. Journal of Islamic Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 269-290.
  • Hefner, R.W. (ed.). (2001). The politics of multiculturalism. Pluralism and citizenship in Malaysia, Singapore, and Indonesia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
  • Huq Pramanik, A. (2002). Islam and development revisited with evidences from Malaysia. Islamic Economic Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 39-74.
  • Hurtig, C. (1991). Risques et menaces de l'Asie du Sud. Cultures & Conflits, no. 2, pp. 113-129.
  • Kapur, A. (2003). Regional security structures in Asia. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
  • Kivimäki, T. (2010). East Asian relative peace – does it exist? What is it? The Pacific Review, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 503-526.
  • López Vidal, L. (2013). La región de Asia-Pacífico, entre la colaboración y el conflict. El País, [online]. 11 January 2013. Available at: https://elpais.com/internacional/2013/01/11/actualidad/1357923228_292840.html [Accessed: 20 July 2018].
  • Mato, B.A. (2009). Las periferias de Asia meridional: fronteras de inseguridad. Análisis del Real Instituto Elcano, no. 161, [online]. Available at: http://biblioteca.ribei.org/1687/1/ARI-161-2009.pdf [Accessed: 19 July 2018].
  • McColl, R.W. (1975). Geopolitical Themes in Contemporary Asian Revolutions. Geographical Review, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 301-310.
  • Neher, C.D. (1994). Asian Style Democracy. Asian Survey, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 949-961.
  • Pareja Alcaraz, P. (2008). El orden regional de Asia oriental en materia de seguridad. Working Papers, no. 271, pp. 1-54, [online]. Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials (ICPS), Barcelona. Available at: https://www.icps.cat/archivos/WorkingPapers/wp271.pdf?noga=1 [Accessed: 19 July 2018].
  • Principales conflictos activos en Asia-Pacífico durante 2010. (2010). Anuario Asia-Pacífico 2010, pp. 185-219, [online]. Available at: http://www.anuarioasiapacifico.es/pdf/2010/19_observatorio_de_conflictos.pdf [Accessed: 20 July 2018].
  • Pye, L.W. and Pye, M.W. (1985). Asian power and politics. The cultural dimensions of authority. Cambridge [et al.]: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Ross, R.S. (1999). The Geography of the Peace: East Asia in the Twenty-First Century. International Security, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 81-118.
  • Searle, P. (2002). Ethno-Religious Conflicts: Rise or Decline? Recent Developments in Southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1-11.
  • Simon, S.W. (1994). East Asian security: The playing field has changed. Asian Survey, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1047-1063.
  • SIPRI Yearbook 2013. (2013). Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. Oxford University Press.
  • Sisodia, N.S. and Kalyanaraman, S. (2010). The future of war and peace in Asia. New Delhi: Magnum Books.
  • Steeds, D. (1997). Reappraising the American Role in Asia. International Affairs, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 255-268.
  • Tan, S-h. (2004). Confucian democracy. A Deweyan reconstruction. Albany: State University of New York Press
  • Taylor, R.L. (1990). The religious dimensions of Confucianism. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Vatikiotis, M. (2006). Resolving Internal Conflicts in Southeast Asia: Domestic Challenges and Regional Perspectives. Contemporary Southeast Asia, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 27-47.
  • Wade, R. (1992). East Asia's Economic Success: Conflicting Perspectives, Partial Insights, Shaky Evidence. World Politics, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 270-320.
  • Weightman, B.A. (2011). Dragons and tigers. A geography of South, East, and Southeast Asia. 3rd ed. Hoboken (N.J.): Wiley.
  • Wei-ming, T. (ed.). (1996). Confucian traditions in East Asian modernity. Moral education and economic culture in Japan and the four mini-dragons. 2nd ed. Cambridge [et al.]: Harvard University Press.
  • Yong, T.T. (2008). Creating “Greater Malaysia”. Decolonization and the politics of Merger. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-ab6d06a3-c962-4afe-b5f3-b96e22931bd2
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.