Bicycle traffic in the cities

• Autorzy: Macioszek Elżbieta , Jurdana Irena

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.20858/sjsutst.2022.117.8

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

For many years in many Western Europe countries, cycling has been associated with not only recreation and tourism but has equally gained an important function as a means of transport used in everyday commuting to work, study and entertainment. The bicycle appears to be a very good alternative to motor vehicles that produce exhaust fumes and create congestion on road transport networks. Not only is the bicycle environmentally friendly and takes up little space in road transport networks, but also, the time of bicycle travel is often competitive in relation to travel made by private car or public transport. This article presents the characteristics of the bicycle infrastructure and services offered in selected cities in the world and Poland, as well as the issues of bicycle counters as sources of data on bicycle traffic volume, along with an exemplary analysis of this type of data.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

bike; bicycle traffic flow; road transport; transport; traffic engineering

PL

rower; natężenie ruchu rowerowego; transport drogowy; transport; inżynieria ruchu

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Transport / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: z. 117
• Strony: 115--127
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 40 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Macioszek Elżbieta

• Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, The Silesian University of Technology, Krasińskiego 8 Street, 40-019 Katowice, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1345-0022

autor

Jurdana Irena

• Faculty of Maritime Studies, University of Rijeka, Studentska Ulica 2, HR-51000 Rijeka, Croatia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3287-1383

Bibliografia

• 1. ArchDaily. ,,The twenty most bicycle-friendly cities in the world”. Available at: www.archdaily.com/920413/the-20-most-bike-friendly-cities-in-the-world-accordingto-copenhagenize-2019.
• 2. Bicycle Warsaw. “Warsaw Bicycle Routes”. Available at: https://um.warszawa.pl/waw/rowery.
• 3. Busłowska Anna. 2020. „Integrated territorial investments and the improvement of transport mobility and accessibility of urban functional areas - the example off the Białystok Functional Area”. Optimum Economic Studies 1(99): 144-154. ISSN: 1506-7637.
• 4. Chambers Peter. 2020. „O bike in Melbourne: A plea for more scepticism about disruption and capital, based on what we can know about one dockless bike scheme”. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 140: 72-80. ISSN: 0965-8564. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.07.016.
• 5. Charting Transport: Trends in journey to twork mode shares in Australian cities to 2016 (second edition). Available at: https://chartingtransport.com/2017/10/24/trends-injourney-to-work-mode-shares-in-australian-cities-to-2016/.
• 6. City Hall of Lublin. “Bicycle policy”. Available at: https://lublin.eu/urzad-miastalublin/. 7. City Hall of Lublin. “Resolution No. 700/XXII/2020. The Council of the City of Lublin”. Available at: https://bip.lublin.eu/gfx/bip/userfiles/_public/import/rada_miasta_lublin/uchwaly/viii_kadencja/22_sesja_15-10-2020/700_xxii_2020.pdf.
• 8. Come Etienne, Latifa Oukhellou. „Model-based count series clustering for bike sharing system usage mining: A case study with the Velib' System of Paris”. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology 5: 1-21. ISSN: 2157-6904. DOI: 10.1145/2560188.
• 9. Cracow Public Transport Authority. “Measurements of bicycle traffic volume”. Available at: https://ztp.krakow.pl/rower/pomiary-ruchu-rowerowego.
• 10. Cycling Solutions: The Technical and Environmental Administration. Copenhagen City of Cyclists Bicycle Account 2010. Kopenhaga 2011. Available at: https://cyclingsolutions.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/CPH-Bicycle-Account-2018.pdf.
• 11. Discover Poznań. “The Cycling Program of the City of Poznań 2017-2022 with the perspective until 2025”. Available at: https://www.poznan.pl/mim/turystyka/programrowerowy-2017-2022-z-perspektywa-do-roku-2025,doc,1017,35659/programrowerowy-2017-2022-z-perspektywa-do-roku-2025,79771.html.
• 12. El-Assi, Mahmoud Mohamed Salah, Habib Khandker Nurul. „Effects of built environments and weather on bike sharing demand: a station level analysis of commercial bike sharing in Toronto”. Transportation 44: 589-613. ISSN: 0049-4488. DOI: 10.1007/s11116-015-9669-z.
• 13. Engineering. Roads. “Ranking: The best Polish cities for cycling”. 2021. Available at: https://inzynieria.com/drogi/rankingi/53068,ranking-najlepsze-polskie-miasta-dlarowerzystow.
• 14. Eyer Amanda, Antonio Ferreira. 2015. „Taking the tyke on a a bike: Mothers' and childless women's space-time geographies in Amsterdam compared”. Environmental and Planning A: Economy and Space 47: 691-708. ISSN: 1472-3409. DOI: 10.1068/a140373p.
• 15. Fisman Elliot, Simon Washington, Narelle Haworth, Angela Watson. 2015. „Factors influencing bike share membership: An analysis of Melbourne and Brisbane”. Transportaion Research Part A: Policy and Practice 71: 17-30. ISSN: 0965-8564. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.10.021.
• 16. Fisman Elliot, Simon Washington, Narelle Haworth, Armando Mazzei. 2014. „Barriers to bikesharing: an analysis from Melbourne and Brisbane”. Journal of Transport Geography 41: 325-337. ISSN: 0966-6923. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.08.005.
• 17. Gawroński Krzysztof, Karol Król, Grażyna Gawrońska, Bartosz Kubicki. 2019. „Analysis of th development of Lublin city bike stations versus the economic and spatial conditions in that city”. Geomatics. Landmanagement and Landscape 4: 183-199. ISSN: 2300-1496. DOI: 10.15576/GLL/2019.4.183.
• 18. Gdańsk by bicycle. “Gdańsk by bicycle”. Available at: https://www.rowerowygdansk.pl/.
• 19. Gössling Stefan. 2013. „Urban transport transitions: Copenhagen, city of cyclists”. Journal of Geography 33: 196-206. ISSN: 0966-6923. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.10.013.
• 20. Grabowski Mikołaj. 2018. „The use of cyclists' counter to measure bicycle traffic, on the example of Rondo Mogilskie in Krakow”. Engineering research. Cracow University of Technology.
• 21. Habib Khandker Nurul, Jenessa Mann, Mohamed Mhmoud, Adam Weiis. 2014. „Synopsis of bicycle demand in the city of Toronto: Investigating the effects of perception, consciousness and comfortability on the purpose of biking and bike ownership”. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 70: 67-80. ISSN: 0965-856. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.012.
• 22. He Pu, Fanyin Zheng, ElenaBelavina, KaranGirotra. 2021. ”Customer Preference and Station Network in the London Bike-Share System”. Management Science 67: 1392-1412. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2020.3620.
• 23. Iwańska Katarzyna, Małgorzata Blicharska, Livia Pierotti, Marko Tainio, Audrey de Nazelle. 2018. „Cycling in Warsaw, Poland - perceived enablers and barriers according to cyclists and non-cyclists”. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 113: 291-301. ISSN: 0965-8564. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.014.
• 24. Kaplan Sigal, Francesco Manca, Thomas Alexander Sick Nielsen, Calo Giamoco Prato. 2015. „Intentions to use bike-sharing for holiday cycling: An application of the theory of planned behavior”. Tourism Management 47: 34-46. ISSN: 0261-5177. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.08.017.
• 25. Li Haojie, Yingheng Zhang, Hongliang Ding, Gang Ren. 2019. „Effects of dockless bike-sharing systems on the usage of the London cycle hire”. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 130: 378-411. ISSN: 0965-8564. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.050.
• 26. Lublin the city of inspiration. “Public transport”. Available at: https://lublin.eu/lublin/komunikacja/komunikacja-miejska/.
• 27. Macioszek Elżbieta, Agata Kurek. 2020. „P&R parking and bike-sharing system as solutions supporting transport accessibility of the city”. Transport Problems 15: 275-286. ISBN: 1896-0596. DOI: 10.21307/TP-2020-066.
• 28. Okraszewska Romanika, Karolina Kijewska, Joanna Wachnicka, Miroslava Mikusova. 2021. „Evalusting the convenience and safety affects of bicycle lanes in Gdańsk”. Archives of Civil Engineering LXVII: 415-432. ISSN: 1230-2945. DOI: 10.24425/ace.2021.138509.
• 29. Otero I., M.J. Nieuwenhuijsen, D. Rojas-Rueda. 2018. „Health impacts of bike sharing systems in Europe”. Environmental International 115: 387-394. ISSN: 0160-4120. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.014.
• 30. Paris Map Bike: Paris Map 360º. Available at: https://parismap360.com/paris-bike-map.
• 31. Paris Respire Service. „La carte Paris Respire”. Available at: https://www.paris.fr/pages/paris-respire-2122.
• 32. Park4Bike. “Ranking of the best cycling paths in Warsaw - Top 8”. Available at: https://park4bike.pl/ranking-najlepszych-sciezek-rowerowych-w-warszawie-top-8/.
• 33. Podgórniak-Krzykacz Aldona, Justyna Trippner-Hrabi. 2021. „Motives and factors that determine city residents' use of public bicycles. The case study of Lodz, Poland”. Case Studies on Transport Policy 9: 651-662. ISSN: 2213-624X. DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2021.03.003.
• 34. Public Information Bulletin. “Resolution No. 283 / VIII / 2019 of the Lublin City Council of July 1, 2019 on the adoption of the Study of the conditions and directions of spatial development for the city of Lublin”. Available at: https://bip.lublin.eu/radamiasta-lublin/uchwaly-rm-lublin/viii-kadencja-rady-miasta-lublin-2018-2023/sesja-nrviii-w-dniach-30-06-i-01-07-2019-nadzwyczajna/uchwala-nr-283viii2019-rady-miastalublin-z-dnia-1-lipca-2019-r-w-sprawie-uchwalenia-studium-uwarunkowan-ikierunkow-zagospodarowania-przestrzennego-miasta-lublin,26,27675,2.html.
• 35. Radzimski Adam, Michał Dzięcielski. 2021. „Exploring the relationship between bikesharing and public transport in Poznań, Poland”. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 145: 189-202. ISBN: 0965-8564. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.01.003.
• 36. Roman Michał, Monika Roman. 2014. „Bicycle transport as an opportunity to develop urban tourism - Warsaw example”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 151: 295-301. ISSN: 1877-0428. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.027.
• 37. Toronto: Cycling in Toronto. Available at: https://www.toronto.ca/servicespayments/streets-parking-transportation/cycling-in-toronto/.
• 38. van Waes Arnoud, Jacco Farla, Rob Raven. 2020. „Why do companies' institutional strategies differ across cities? A cross-case analysis of bike sharing in Shanghai & Amsterdam”. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 36: 151-161. ISSN: 2210-4224. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.06.002.
• 39. van Waes Arnoud, Jacco Farla, Koen Frenken, Jeroen P.J. de Jong, Rob Raven. 2018. „Business model innovation and socio-technical transitions. A new prospective framework with an application to bike sharing”. Journal of Cleaner Production 195: 1300-1312. ISSN: 0959-6526. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.223.
• 40. Veturilo. “2019 Season Summary”. Available at: https://veturilo.waw.pl/veturilopodsumowanie-sezonu-2019.