Risk Analysis and Human Factor in Prevention of CRG Casualties

• Autorzy: Kobylinski L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

CRG casualties create one of the major type casualties in shipping. Prevention of CRG casualties is an important issue, especially because of the number of CRG casualties has increased almost twice during recent years. For the great majority of all CRG casualties human factor responsible, and the increasing number of these casualties might be attributed to poorer qualifications of ship masters who have not enough experience in handling very large ships put into operation presently. Risk analysis is a modern method for assessment of safety level of technical systems. This tool may be the used to investigate causes of casualties and to find out most effective prevention measures. Risk analysis is widely used in many areas; in case of marine technology it is used routinely in off-shore technology. The author investigates possibilities to apply risk analysis in the area of ship handling with the focus on human factor. This is preliminary study where possible methodology for hazards identification and risk assessment in respect of CRG casualties are investigated and risk control options are suggested. Various aspects of the influence of human factor in collision avoidance are listed and in particular the effect of training is stressed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

risk analysis; Human Factor; CRG Casualties; Ship Handling Research and Training Centre at Ilawa; Poland; Collision Avoidance; Collisions-Ramming-Groundings (CRG); Safe Manoeuvres; Human and Organization Errors (HOE)

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2009
• Tom: Vol. 3, no. 4
• Strony: 443--448
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 12 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kobylinski L.

• Foundation for Safety of Navigation and Environment Protection, Iława, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1 Bea, G.R. (1994). The role of human error in design, construc-tion and reliability of marine structures. Ship Structure Re-port SSC-378
• 2 Hoppe H. (2006). Goal based standards – a new approach to the international regulations of ship construction. IMO News Issue 1
• 3 IMO ( 2002). Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process. Doc. MSC/Circ. 1023;
• 4 IMO ( 2002a). Guidance on the use of human element analyz-ing process (HEAP) and formal safety assessment (FSA) in the IMO rule making process. Doc. MSC/Circ. 1022;
• 5 Kobyliński, L. (2006). Appraisal of risk assessment approach to stability of ships. 8th International Ship Stability Work-shop, Istambul
• 6 Kobyliński, L. (2007). Goal–based standards. 9th International Ship Stability Workshop. Hamburg
• 7 Payer, H. (1994). Schffssicherheit und menschliche Versagen. Hansa-Schiffahrt-Schiffbau-Hafen 131 Jahrgang, No.10
• 8 Samuelides, E., Frieze, P. (1984). Experimental and numerical sikulation of ship collisions. Proc 3rd Congress on Marine Technology (IMAEM. Athens
• 9 The Naval Architect (1999) March issue.
• 10 US Coast Guard (1995) Preventing through people. Quality ac-tion team report
• 11 US Coast Guard (1981). Report M-8-81
• 12 Vassalos, D. (2002). Total ship safety – a life-cycle risk-based DOR for safety. The Stability Research Centre NAME. Universities of Glasgow and Strathclyde. Report.