Scientometric analysis in the field of management: Return To Work programs

• Autorzy: Więcek-Janka Ewa , Stachurska Maria

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21008/j.0239-9415.2023.088.10

Warianty tytułu

PL

Analiza scientometryczna w obszarze zarządzania: program Return To Work

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The topic of employee absence is an issue that so far has been studied from the perspective of costs incurred by employers. The lengthening of the average life expectancy means that in terms of the next twenty years there will be a significant extension of the period of economic activity. Therefore, Return To Work (RTW) programs in the context of employees returning after absence will play an important role in building the competitive advantage of enterprises and be an opportunity for development. The aim of this article is to present the results of a bibliometric and scientometric analysis of the issue of RTW programs. The main point of reference are journals and publications included in the Web of Science database from 1900 to 2023, with a detailed analysis of works from the last twenty years, i.e. 2000-2021. The data obtained were used to perform a scientometric analysis, specifically focusing on: the number of publications, authorship and co-authorship, the number of citations, journals, thematic categories, institutions, countries and keywords. The study included 106 publications with a citation frequency of 1,801. The subject of RTW programs is most frequently discussed by researchers from the USA, Canada and Northern European countries. Researchers from Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Institute for Work Health, the University of Toronto, and VU University Medical Center have published the most in this area, constituting over 45% of publications.

PL

Temat nieobecności pracowników to zagadnienie dotychczas badane z perspektywy kosztów ponoszonych przez pracodawców. Wydłużająca się przeciętna długość życia sprawia, że w perspektywie najbliższych dwudziestu kilku lat nastąpi znaczące wydłużenie się okresu aktywności zawodowej. Zatem program RTW w kontekście pracowników wracających po nieobecności będzie odgrywać ważną rolę w budowaniu przewagi konkurencyjnej przedsiębiorstw oraz będzie szansą na rozwój. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest przedstawienie wyników analizy bibliometrycznej oraz scientometrycznej zagadnienia dotyczącego programu RTW. Głównym punktem odniesienia są czasopisma i publikacje zamieszczone w bazie Web of Science w latach 1900-2023, szczegółowej analizie poddano zaś prace z ostatniego dwudziestolecia, tj. lata 2000-2021. Pozyskane dane posłużyły wykonaniu analizy scientometrycznej, a w szczególności: liczby publikacji, autorstwa i współautorstwa, liczby cytowań, czasopism, kategorii tematycznych, instytucji, krajów oraz słów kluczowych. W badaniach pod uwagę wzięto 106 publikacji, których częstotliwość cytowania to 1801 razy. Program RTW to zagadnienie najczęściej poruszane przez badaczy z USA, Kanady i krajów Europy Północnej. Najwięcej w tym obszarze publikują pracownicy naukowi Vrije Univesitet Amsterdam, Institute for Work Health, University of Toronto, VU University Medical Center, które stanowią ponad 45% publikacji w tym obszarze.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

employee absence management; RTW program; Return To Work; term sickness absence

PL

zarządzanie nieobecnościami pracowników; program RTW; Return To Work; terminowa absencja chorobowa; analiza naukometryczna

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Poznańskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Nr 88
• Strony: 179--204
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Więcek-Janka Ewa

• Politechnika Poznańska, Wydział Inżynierii Zarządzania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5596-307X

autor

Stachurska Maria

• Politechnika Poznańska, Wydział Inżynierii Zarządzania

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6050-2182

Bibliografia

• 1. Backman, C.L. (2004). Employment and work disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol., 16(2), 148-152.
• 2. Barli, R., Clarke, J., Friesen, M., Stock, S., Cole, D. (2003). Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: A qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med., 57(11), 2101-2114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00131-X.
• 3. Bernacki, E.J., Guidera, J.A., Schaefer, J.A., Tsai, S. (2000). A facilitated early return to work program at a large urban medical center. J Occup Environ Med., 42(12), 1172-1179.
• 4. Diodato, V., Gellaty, P. (2013). Dictionary of Bibliometrics. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
• 5. Engelsen, S. (2022). Wellbeing competence. 7(42), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7020042.
• 6. Hogelund, J., Holm, A., McIntosh, J. (2009). Does graded return-to-work improve sick-listed workers' chance of returning to regular working hours? Journal of Health Economics, 29(2010), 158-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.11.009.
• 7. Hoving, J.L., Broekhuizen, M.L.A., Frings-Dresen, M.H.W. (2009). Return to work of breast cancer survivors: A systematic review of intervention studies. BMC Cancer, 9(117). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-117.
• 8. Juliszewski, T., Slawinska, M., Stachurska, M. (2022). Ergonomics in the face of pandemic challenges. Part 1. Subjective assessment of employee stress in the face of remote work during SARS-CoV-2: T. I. Cracow: Cracow University of Technology Publishing House.
• 9. Kasdan, A., McLwain, N. (1989). Return-to-work programs following occupational hand injuries. Occup Med., 4(3):539-45. 4(3), 539-545.
• 10. Kleiman, E.M., Ammerman, B., Look, A.E., Berman, M.E., McCloskey, M.S. (2014). The role of emotion reactivity and gender in the relationship between psychopathology and self-injurious behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 150-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.021.
• 11. Lammerts, L., Schaafsma, F.G., van Mechelen, W., Anema, J.R. (2016). Execution of a participatory supportive return to work program within the Dutch social security sector: A qualitative evaluation of stakeholders' perceptions. BMC Public Health, 16(323). https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s12889-016-2997-x.
• 12. Lysaght, R.M., Rosemary, M., Larmour-Trode, S. (2008). An exploration of social suport as a factor in the return-to-work process. Work, 30(3), 255-266.
• 13. Marhold, C., Linton, S.J., Melin, L. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral return-to-work program: Effects on pain patients with a history of long-term versus short-term sick leave. Pain, 91(1-2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00431-0.
• 14. Mattaliano, R. (2008). Beyond the Ad Hoc Approach: Putting a Return-to-Work Program “on the Books”. Professional Case Management, 13(5), 290-292. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PCAMA.0000336695.23565.43.
• 15. McMackin, R.A., Newman, E., Fogler, J.M., Keane, T.M. (2015). Trauma therapy: Evidence-based therapy theory and practice, American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13746-000.
• 16. Mongeon, P., Paul-Hus, A. (2015). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics. 106(1), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1765-5.
• 17. Nieuwenhuijsen, K., Faber, B., Verbeek, J.H., Neumeyer-Gromen, A., Hees, H.L., Verhoeven, A.C., van der Feltz-Cornelis, C.M., Bültmann, U. (2014). Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people (Review), Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 12.
• 18. Oades, L.G., Jarden, A., Hou, H., Ozturk, C., Williams, P.R. Slemp, G., Huang, L. (2021). Wellbeing Literacy: A Capability Model for Wellbeing Science and Practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 719. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020719.
• 19. Orea-Giner, A., Fuste-Forne, F. (2023). The way we live, the way we travel: Generation Z and sustainable consumption in food tourism experiences-Web of Science Core Collection. British Food Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-11-2022-0962.
• 20. Osinski, Z. (2012). Bibliometrics method of analysis and evaluation of scientific achievements of historians of recent Polish history. Lublin: UMCS.
• 21. Quinn, L., Dibb, S., Simkin, L., Canhoto, A., Analogbei, M. (2016). Troubled waters: The transformation of marketing in a digital world. European Journal of Marketing, 50(12), 2103-2133. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/EJM-08- 2015-0537.
• 22. Reiman, A., Väyrynen, S. (2018). Holistic well-being and sustainable organizations – A review and argumentative propositions. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 11(5), 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2018.1474397.
• 23. Rueda, S., Chambers, L., Wilson, M., Mustard, C., Rouke, S., Bayoumi, A., Raboud, J., Lavis, J. (2012). Association of Returning to Work with better health in working-aged adults: A systematic review. Am J Public Health, 102(3).
• 24. Steenstra, I.A., Anema, J.R., van Tulder, M.W., Bongers, P.M., de Vet, H.C.W., van Mechelen, W. (2006). Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain. J Occup Rehabil., 16(4)557-578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-006-9053-0.
• 25. Steward, M.D., Narus, J.A., Roehm, M.L., Ritz, W. (2019). From transactions to journeys and beyond: The evolution of B2B buying process modeling. Industrial Marketing Management, 83, 288-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.05.002.
• 26. Trzyniec, K. (2022). Health effects of work and life in the age of pandemics. Cracow: Cracow University of Technology Publishing House.
• 27. Van Eck, N.J., Waltman, L. (2010). VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
• 28. Velt, H., Torkkeli, L., Laine, I. (2020). Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research: Bibliometric Mapping of the Domain. Journal of Business Ecosystems. 1(2), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.4018/JBE.20200701.oa1.
• 29. Williams, J.M., Andersen, M.B. (1997). Psychosocial Influences on Central and Peripheral Vision and Reaction Time During Demanding Tasks. Behavioral Medicine, 22(4), 160-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.1997.10543549.