PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Stereotype threat as a determinant of burnout or work engagement. Mediating role of positive and negative emotions

Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Stereotype threat as an example of serious interpersonal strain at workplace can lead either to impaired work engagement or it can motivate workers to strengthen their efforts to disconfirm a stereotype and can result in excessive work engagement. Thus, the basic aim of the study was to examine whether stereotype threat is related to burnout or to work engagement. The mediating role of the negative and positive emotions were also tested in the classical approach. Mediational analysis revealed a linear relation of stereotype threat and burnout, mediated by negative emotions and a quadratic relationship between stereotype threat and work engagement. In the latter analysis none of the mediators were significant. Therefore, the results showed that both burnout and work engagement are associated with stereotype threat at the workplace, probably depending on the stage of response to the stereotype threat. Further research should confirm these associations in a longitudinal study.
Rocznik
Strony
1--8
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 55 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poland
  • Central Institute of Labour Protection – National Research Institute (CIOP-PIB), Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Steele CM, Aronson J. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69(5):797–811. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797.
  • 2. Schmader T, Johns M, Forbes C. An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychol Rev. 2008;115(2):336–356. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336.
  • 3. Osborne JW. Gender, stereotype threat and anxiety: psychophysiological and cognitive evidence. J Res Educ Psychol. 2006;8:109–138.
  • 4. Osborne JW. Linking stereotype threat and anxiety. Educ Psychol. 2007;27:135–154. doi: 10.1080/01443410601069929.
  • 5. Matheson K, Anisman H. Anger and shame elicited by discrimination: moderating role do coping on action endorsments and salivary cortisol. European J Soc Psych. 2009;39:163–185. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.522.
  • 6. Nguyen HHD, Ryan AM. Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. J App Psych. 2008;93(6):1314–1334. doi: 10.1037/a0012702.
  • 7. Brown RP, Josephs RA. A burden of proof: stereotype relevance and gender differences in math performance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;76:246–257. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.246.
  • 8. Pronin E, Steele C, Ross L. Identity bifurcation in response to stereotype threat: women and mathematics. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2004;40:152–168. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00088-X.
  • 9. Keller J. Stereotype threat in classroom settings: the interactive effect of domain identification, task difficulty and stereotype threat on female students' maths performance. British J Educ Psych. 2007;77:323–338. doi: 10.1348/000709906X113662.
  • 10. Blascovich J, Spencer S, Quinn D, Steele C. African Americans and high blood pressure: the role of stereotype threat. Psych Sci. 2001;12(3):225–229. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00340.
  • 11. Inzlicht M, Kang SK. Stereotype threat spillover: how coping with threats to social identity affects aggression, eating, decision making, and attention. J Pers Soc Psych. 2010;99:467–481. doi: 10.1037/a0018951.
  • 12. Kray LJ, Thompson L, Galinsky A. Battle of the sexes: gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001;80:942–958. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.942.
  • 13. Kray LJ, Reb J, Galinsky AD, Thompson L. Stereotype reactance at the bargaining table: the effect of stereotype activation and power on claiming and creating value. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004;30:399–411. doi: 10.1177/0146167203261884.
  • 14. Bergeron DM, Block CJ, Echtenkamp BA. Disabling the able: stereotype threat and women's work performance. Hum Perf. 2006;19:133–158. doi: 10.1207/s15327043hup1902_3.
  • 15. Davies PG, Spencer SJ, Steele CM. Clearing the air: identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;88:276–287. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276.
  • 16. von Hippel C, Issa M, Ma R, Stokes A. Stereotype threat: antecedents and consequences for working women. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2011;41(2):151–161. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.749.
  • 17. Kray L, Shirako A. Stereotype threat in organizations: an examination of its scope, triggers, and possible interventions. In: Inzlicht M, Schmader T, editors. Stereotype threat: theory, process, and application [monograph on the Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 173–187.
  • 18. von Hippel C, Kalokerinos E, Henry J. Stereotype threat among older employees: relationship with job attitudes and turnover intentions. Psych Aging. 2013;28(1):17–27. doi: 10.1037/a0029825.
  • 19. Inzlicht M, Ben-Zeev T. A threatening intellectual environment: why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psych Sci. 2000;11:365–371. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00272.
  • 20. Podsakoff NP, LePine JA, LePine MA. Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92:438–454. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438.
  • 21. Block C, Koch S, Liberman B, Merriweather T, Roberson L. Contending with stereotype threat at work: a model of long-term responses. Couns Psychol. 2011;39(4):570–600. doi: 10.1177/0011000010382459.
  • 22. Maslach Ch. Burnout, the cost of caring. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1982.
  • 23. Maslach Ch, Schaufeli WB. Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annu Rev Psych. 2001;52:397–422.24. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397.
  • 24. Borgogni L, Consiglio Ch, Alessandri G, Schaufeli WB. “Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater!”. Interpersonal strain at work and burnout. Europ J Work Oraniz Psychol. 2012;21:875–898..
  • 25. Maslach C, Leiter MP. The truth about burnout. San Francisco: Jossey Bass; 1997.
  • 26. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement. J Org Behav. 2004;25(3):293–315. doi: 10.1002/job.248.
  • 27. Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, Gonzalez-Roma V, Bakker AB. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happ Stud. 2002;3:71–92. doi: 10.1023/A:1015630930326.
  • 28. Schaufeli WB, Salanova M. Efficacy or inefficacy, that's the question: burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety, Stress, Coping 2007;20:177–196. doi: 10.1080/10615800701217878.
  • 29. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol. 2007;22:309–328. doi: 10.1108/02683940710733115.
  • 30. Demerouti E, Mostert K, Bakker AB. Burnout and work engagement: a thorough investigation of the independency of both constructs. J Occup Health Psych. 2010;15(3):209–222. doi: 10.1037/a0019408.
  • 31. Pasikowski T. Polska adaptacja kwestionariusza Maslach Burnout Inventory. In: Sęk H, editor. Wypalenie zawodowe: przyczyny, mechanizmy, zapobieganie. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 2005. p. 135–148.
  • 32. Watson, D, Clark LA. Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule (expanded form). Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa, Iowa City; 1994.
  • 33. Fajkowska M, Marszał-Wiśniewska M. Właściwości psychometryczne Skali Pozytywnego i Negatywnego Afektu – Wersja Rozszerzona (PANAS-X). Wstępne wyniki badań na polskiej próbie. [Psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule – Expanded Form (PANS-X). The study on a Polish sample.] Przeg Psych. 200;52(4):355–388.
  • 34. May DR, Gilson RL, Harter LM. The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. J Occ Organ Psych. 2004;77:11–37. doi: 10.1348/096317904322915892.
  • 35. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research – conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
  • 36. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Beh Res Methods. 2008;40:879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
  • 37. Hayes AF, Preacher KJ. Quantifying and testing indirect effects in simple mediation models when the constituent paths are nonlinear. Multiv Behav Res. 2010;45:627–660. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2010.498290.
  • 38. Hoyle RH, Kenny DA. Sample size, reliability, and tests of statistical mediation. In: Hoyle RH, editor. Statistical strategies for small sample research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 1999. p. 195–222.
  • 39. Glazer S, Beehr TA. Consistency of implications of three role stressors across four counties. J Org Behavior. 2005;26:467–487. doi: 10.1002/job.326.
  • 40. Osborne JW. Testing stereotype threat: does anxiety explain race and sex differences in achievement? Contemp Educ Psychol. 2001;26:291–310. doi: 10.1006/ceps.2000.1052.
  • 41. Bosson JK, Haymovitz EL, Pinel EC. When saying and doing diverge: the effects of stereotype threat on self-reported versus non-verbal anxiety. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2004;40:247–255. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00099-4.
  • 42. Swim JK, Hyers LL, Cohen LL, Ferguson MJ. Everyday sexism: evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. J Soc Iss. 2001;57:31–53. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00200.
  • 43. Swim JK, Hyers LL, Cohen LL, Fitzgerald DC, Bylsma WH. African American college students’ experience with everyday racism: characteristics of and responses to these incidents. J Black Psychol. 2003;29:38–67. doi: 10.1177/0095798402239228.
  • 44. Hansen N, Sassenberg K. Does social identification harm or serve as a buffer? The impact of social identification on anger after experiencing social discrimination. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006;7:983–996. doi: 10.1177/0146167206287639.
  • 45. Roberts LM. Changing faces: professional image construction in diverse organizational settings. Acad Manag Rev. 2005;30:685–711. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2005.18378873.
  • 46. Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Euwema MC. Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. J Occup Health Psychol. 2005;10:170–180. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.170.
  • 47. Brown SP. A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. Psych Bull. 1996;120:235–255. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.235.
  • 48. Brown SP, Leigh TW. A new look at psychological climate and its relationship to job involvement, effort, and performance. J App Psych. 1996;81:358–368. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.358.
  • 49. Laczo RM, Hanisch KA. An examination of behavioral families of organizational withdrawal in volunteer workers and paid employees. Human Res Manag Rev. 1999;9:453–477.
  • 50. Harrison DA, Newman DA, Roth PL. How important are job attitudes? Meta-analytic comparisons of integrative behavioral outcomes and time sequences. Acad Manag J. 2006;49:305–325. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786077.
  • 51. Van Dam A, Keijers GPJ, Eling PATM, Becker ES. Impaired cognitive performance and responsiveness to reward in burnout patients: two years later. Work Stress. 2012;26(4):333–346. doi: 10.1080/02678373.2012.737550.
  • 52. Marx DM, Ko SJ, Friedman RA. ‘The Obama effect’: how salient role model reduces race-based performance differences. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009;45(4):953–956. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.012.
  • 53. Marx DM, Roman JS. Female role models: protecting woman's math test performance. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2002;28(9):1183–1193. doi: 10.1177/01461672022812004.
  • 54. Martens A, Johns M, Greenberg J, Schimel J. Combating stereotype threat: the effect of self-affirmation on woman's intellectual performance. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2006;42(2):236–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.010.
  • 55. Cohen GL, Garcia J, Purdi-Vaughans V, Apfel N, Brzusotski P. Recursive processes in self-affirmation: intervening to close minority achievement gap. Science. 2009;324(5925):400–403. doi: 10.1126/science.1170769.
Uwagi
PL
Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-aa16ca61-d2ad-4405-8c48-e7fe1f69a9bb
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.