PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

The significance of management culture on investigative audit quality

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Znaczenie kultury zarządzania dla śledzenia jakości badania
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This research aims to identify and analyze the influence of integrity and professionalism on the quality of investigative audits. This research is based on several phenomena related to the quality of investigative audits and the reputation of the BPK and previous theories and research to prove the hypotheses. This study uses descriptive and causal explanatory methods by conducting hypothesis testing. This research focuses on the effect of integrity and professionalism on the quality of investigative audits. The population specified in this study is 94 working units with a total of 267 investigators. This survey gathered information using structured interviews and questionnaires. The analysis techniques employed to analyze the data are descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. The research hypotheses are tested using structural equation modeling (SEM). The obtained hypothetical test results by testing the significance of coefficient pathways in structural models show that the integrity and professionalism of auditors can affect investigative audit quality. The integrity and professionalism of auditors have a positive influence on the BPK. The quality of investigative audits has a positive influence on the reputation of the BPK. The integrity and professionalism of auditors positively influence reputation through the quality of investigative audits.
PL
Niniejsze badanie ma na celu identyfikację i analizę wpływu rzetelności i profesjonalizmu na jakość audytów śledczych. Niniejsze badania opierają się na kilku zjawiskach związanych z jakością audytów śledczych i reputacją BPK oraz wcześniejszych teoriach i badaniach mających na celu potwierdzenie hipotez. W niniejszym badaniu zastosowano opisowe i przyczynowe metody wyjaśniające, przeprowadzając testowanie hipotez. Niniejsze badanie koncentruje się na wpływie uczciwości i profesjonalizmu na jakość audytów śledczych. Populacja określona w tym badaniu to 94 działające jednostki z łącznie 267 badaczami. W badaniu zebrano informacje za pomocą ustrukturyzowanych wywiadów i kwestionariuszy. Techniki analityczne zastosowane do analizy danych to statystyki opisowe i statystyki wnioskowe. Hipotezy badawcze są testowane za pomocą modelowania równań strukturalnych (SEM). Hipotetyczne wyniki testów uzyskane w wyniku badania istotności ścieżek współczynników w modelach strukturalnych pokazują, że uczciwość i profesjonalizm audytorów może wpływać na jakość audytu dochodzeniowego. Uczciwość i profesjonalizm audytorów pozytywnie wpływa na BPK. Jakość audytów śledczych pozytywnie wpływa na reputację BPK. Uczciwość i profesjonalizm audytorów pozytywnie wpływa na reputację poprzez jakość audytów śledczych.
Rocznik
Strony
335--350
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 39 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan
autor
  • Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Faculty of Economics and Business
  • Universitas Padjadjaran
Bibliografia
  • 1. Aghazadeh, S., Hoang, K., (2020). How Does Audit Firm Emphasis on Client Relationship Quality Influence Auditors’ Inferences About And Responses To Potential Persuasion In Client Communications. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 87(November), 101175.
  • 2. Akbar, B., Djanegara, M. S., Djazuli, A., Pamungkas, B. and Mulyani, S., (2016). Factors Affecting the Probability of Local Government Financial Statement to Get Unqualified Opinion. Journal The IAFOR International Conference on the Social Science.
  • 3. Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., Beasley, M. S. and Hogan, C. E., (2017). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach, 13th Edition. Pearson Education Limited.
  • 4. Backer, W., & Saisana, M., (2018). Financial Secrecy Index 2018 Methodology Including Stistical Audit by Research Centre of the European Comission (1st ed., Issue June). Tax Justice Network.
  • 5. Baxter, J., Dempsey, J., Megone, C., & Lee, J., (2018). Real Integrity - Practical Solutions for Organisations Seeking to Promote And Encourage Integrity (1st ed.). University of Leeds.
  • 6. Bilal, Chen, S., Komal, B., (2018). Audit Committee Financial Expertise and Earnings Quality: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Business Research, 84, 253-270.
  • 7. Chen, Y., Che, L., Zheng, D. and You, H., (2020). Corruption Culture and Accounting Quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(2), 1-22.
  • 8. Cho, M., Kwon, S. Y. and Krishnan, G. V., (2020). Audit Fee Lowballing: Determinants, Recovery, And Future Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 1-24.
  • 9. Cipriano, M., Hamilton, E. L. and Vandervelde, S. D., (2017). Has The Lack of Use of The Qualified Audit Opinion Turned It Into The “Rotten Kid” threat? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 47(September), 26-38.
  • 10. Cooper, D. R., Schindler, P. S., (2016). Business Research Methods. In JMcGraw-Hill Irwin (12th ed., Vol. 53, Issue 9). McGraw-Hill Irwin.
  • 11. Deb, D., Dey, R. and Balas, V. E., (2019). Contributions, Arguments, and Dealing with Criticisms. In Engineering Research Methodology (pp. 67-77). Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
  • 12. Donelson, D. C., Ege, M., Imdieke, A. J. and Maksymov, E., (2020). The Revival of Large Consulting Practices at The Big 4 And Audit Quality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 87(November), 101157.
  • 13. Eshleman, J. D., Guo, P., (2020). Do Seasoned Industry Specialists Provide Higher Audit Quality? A Re-Examination. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(6), 106770.
  • 14. FRC. (2016). Feedback Statement : Enhancing Confidence In Audit : The Financial Reporting Council’s Audit Enforcement Procedure (Issue June).
  • 15. Fung, S. Y. K., Raman, K. K. and Zhu, X. (Kevin)., (2017). Does The PCAOB International Inspection Program Improve Audit Quality For Non-US-Listed Foreign Clients? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 64(1), 1-69.
  • 16. GAO. (2019). Performance and Accountability Report: Fiscal Year 2019.
  • 17. Haapamäki, E., Sihvonen, J., (2019). Research on International Standards on Auditing: Literature Synthesis and Opportunities for Future Research. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 35, 37-56.
  • 18. Hair, J. F. J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M., (2014). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (1 (ed.)). Sage Publications, Inc.
  • 19. Halabi, H., Alshehabi, A. and Zakaria, I., (2019). Informal Institutions and Managers’ Earnings Management Choices: Evidence From IFRS-Adopting Countries. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 15(3), 1-22.
  • 20. Harris, M. K., Williams, L. T., (2020). Audit Quality Indicators: Perspectives from Non-Big Four Audit Firms and Small Company Audit Committees. Advances in Accounting, 50, 1-13.
  • 21. Heyrani, F., Banimahd, B. and Roudposhti, F. R., (2016). Investigation of the Effect of Auditors’ Professionalism Levels on Their Judgment to Resolve the Conflict between Auditor and Management. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36(16), 177-188.
  • 22. Hunt, J. O. S., Rosser, D. M. and Rowe, S. P., (2020). Using Machine Learning to Predict Auditor Switches: How the Likelihood of Switching Affects Audit Quality Among Non-Switching Clients. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, (September), 106785.
  • 23. Hux, C. T., (2017). Use of Specialists on Audit Engagements: A Research Synthesis And Directions For Future Research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 39, 1-68.
  • 24. Iqbal, H., Waheed, B., Haider, H., Tesfamariam, S. and Sadiq, R., (2019). Mapping Safety Culture Attributes with Integrity Management Program to Achieve Assessment Goals: A Framework For Oil And Gas Pipelines Industry. Journal of Safety Research, 68, 59-69.
  • 25. Kouaib, A., Almulhim, A., (2019). Earnings manipulations and board’s diversity: The moderating role of audit. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 30(2), 100356.
  • 26. Lee, S. C., Su, J. M., Tsai, S. B., Lu, T. L. and Dong, W., (2016). A Comprehensive Survey Of Government Auditors’ Self-Efficacy And Professional Development For Improving Audit Quality. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 1-25.
  • 27. Liu, G., & Sun, J., (2019). Did the SEC Administrative Proceedings Against Chinese Auditors Affect Audit Quality? Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 37, 1-34.
  • 28. Malhotra, N., Lopes, E. and Veiga, R., (2014). Structural Equation Modeling with Lisrel: An Initial Vision. REMark: Revista Brasileira de Marketing, 13(2), 28-43.
  • 29. Mao, J., Ettredge, M. and Stone, M., (2020). Group Audits: Are Audit Quality and Price Associated With The Lead Auditor’s Decision To Accept Responsibility? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39(2), 1-25.
  • 30. Masoud, N., (2017). An Empirical Study of Audit Expectation-Performance Gap: The Case of Libya. Research in International Business and Finance, 41, 1-21.
  • 31. Mulyani, S., Darma, J. and Sukmadilaga, C., (2016). The Effect of Clarity of Business Vision and Top Management Support on the Quality of Business Intelligence Systems : Evidens from Indonesia. Asian Journal of Information Technology, 15(16), 2958-2964.
  • 32. Nguyen, L., Vu, L. and Yin, X., (2020). The Undesirable Effect of Audit Quality: Evidence From Firm Innovation. The British Accounting Review, 1-21.
  • 33. Ocak, M., Kablan, A. and Dursun, G. D., (2020). Does Auditing Multiple Clients Affiliated with The Same Business Group Reduce Audit Quality? Evidence from An Emerging Market. Borsa Istanbul Review, 1-22.
  • 34. Seckler, C., Gronewold, U. and Reihlen, M., (2017). An error management perspective on audit quality: Toward a multi-level model. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 62(October), 21-42.
  • 35. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R., (2016). Research Methods for Business, a Skill Building Approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • 36. Sukmadilaga, C., Pratama, A. and Mulyani, S., (2015). Good Governance Implementation in Public Sector: Exploratory Analysis of Government Financial Statements Disclosures Across ASEAN Countries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211(September), 513-518.
  • 37. Viel, A., Tessier, N. and Olfert, R., (2019). 2019 Audit Quality Report Evolving Today with A Vision For Tomorrow.
  • 38. Wang, P., Yuan, L. and Wu, J., (2017). The Joint Effects of Social Identity and Institutional Pressures on Audit Quality: The Case Of The Chinese Audit Industry. International Business Review, 26(4), 1-17.
  • 39. Xiong, H., Hou, F., Li, H. and Wang, H., (2020). Does Rice Farming Shape Audit Quality: Evidence from Signing Auditors Level Analysis. Economic Modelling, 91, 1-50.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-a9538235-6d48-4f16-8344-e84fcb9190e0
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.