Assessment of the concept of the new methodology for the evaluation of ship planned maintenance system

• Autorzy: Stanivuk T. , Stazić L. , Vidović F. , Bratić K.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.15.04.03

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper presents an attempt to develop better and cheaper methodology for evaluation of the quality of the ships’ computerized Planned Maintenance System databases. A concept for the better methodology has been developed following many times verified rule that faster and cheaper is better. The concept of the methodology has been checked in operation, tested on four different databases. Results of the evaluation performed by the concept are compared with an expert evaluation using old, verified methodology, performed on same databases. Comparison valuated the concept, bringing the verdict if it is functioning or not, showing that the old and verified rule is not functioning every time.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

ship operation problems; maintenance system; Planned Maintenance System; assessment process; expert opinion; onboard maintenance

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 15 No. 4
• Strony: 739--742
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 13 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Stanivuk T.

• University of Split, Split, Croatia

autor

Stazić L.

• University of Split, Split, Croatia

autor

Vidović F.

• University of Split, Split, Croatia

autor

Bratić K.

• University of Split, Split, Croatia

Bibliografia

• 1. Doremus, J., Helfand, G., Liu, C., Donahue, M., Kahan, A., Shelby, M.: Simpler is better: Predicting consumer vehicle purchases in the short run. Energy Policy. 129, 1404–1415 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.051.
• 2. Geurts, W.J.W.: Faster is Better and Cheaper. INCOSE International Symposium. 26, 1, 1002–1015 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-5837.2016.00207.x.
• 3. Hoxmeier, J.A.: Typology of database quality factors. Software Quality Journal. 7, 3, 179–193 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008923120973.
• 4. Jung, H.-J.: The Quantity Data Estimation for Software Quality Testing. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society. 8, 10, 37–43 (2017). https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.10.037.
• 5. Kolossa, A., Kopp, B.: Data quality over data quantity in computational cognitive neuroscience. Neuroimage. 172, 775–785 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.01.005.
• 6. McMahon, P., Zhang, T., Dwight, R.A.: Approaches to Dealing With Missing Data in Railway Asset Management. IEEE Access. 8, 48177–48194 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978902.
• 7. Pérez-Medina, J.-L., Acosta-Vargas, P., Sampedro, C., Paredes, A., Carrión, M., Santórum, M., Samaniego-Santillán, L.-P., Maldonado-Garcés, V.-G., Corrales-Gaitero, C., Ortiz-Carranco, N.-Y.: Using Expert Evaluation to Assess the Usability of an Educational Mobile Game for Cognitive Skills Training. In: Nunes, I.L. (ed.) Advances in Human Factors and Systems Interaction. pp. 265–271 Springer International Publishing, Cham (2020).
• 8. Petrevska, I., Ilic, I., Petrevska, M., Markovic, B.: Kaizen as the Element of Overall Management Quality Control. Int’l J. Econ. & L. 9, 25, 129 (2019).
• 9. Rossi, P.H., Lipsey, M.W., Freeman, H.E.: Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. SAGE Publications, Inc;
• 10. Roy-Hubara, N., Sturm, A.: Design methods for the new database era: a systematic literature review. Software and Systems Modeling. 19, 2, 297–312 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-019-00739-8.
• 11. Stanivuk, T., Stazić, L., Vidović, F., Čobanov, A.: Ship Planned Maintenance System Data Analysis. International Journal for Traffic and Transport Engineering. 10, 4, 432–436 (2020). https://doi.org/10.7708/ijtte.2020.10(4).02.
• 12. Stazić, L., Komar, I., Račić, N.: Evaluation Methodology for Ship’s Planned Maintenance System Database. Trans. Marit. Sci. 6, 2, 109–116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.7225/toms.v06.n02.002.
• 13. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin. 76, 2, 105–110 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031322.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).